From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: "Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)" <Haibo.Xu@arm.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"jdike@addtoit.com" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Bin Lu (Arm Technology China)" <Bin.Lu@arm.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ptrace: introduce ptrace_syscall_enter to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 06:23:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190304122331.GG3969@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190304104643.GA28643@e107155-lin>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:46:43AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:03:47AM +0000, Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > On 2019/3/1 2:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > +long ptrace_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef TIF_SYSCALL_EMU
> > > + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> > > + if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs));
> >
> > Shall we remove the semi-colon at end of the above line?
>
> Added intentionally to keep GCC happy.
GCC warns because the user explicitly asked for it, with __must_check.
If you want to do things with an "if" like this, you should write e.g.
if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
/*
* We can ignore the return code here, because of
* X and Y and Z.
*/
;
Or it probably is nicer to use a block:
if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs)) {
/*
* We can ignore the return code here, because of
* X and Y and Z.
*/
}
The point is, you *always* should have a nice fat comment if you are
ignoring the return code of a __must_check function.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-04 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 18:32 [PATCH 0/6] ptrace: consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] ptrace: move clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag to core Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] ptrace: introduce ptrace_syscall_enter to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 8:03 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 12:23 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2019-03-04 12:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook Sudeep Holla
2019-03-03 1:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-04 10:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 8:25 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 2:14 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-11 18:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-12 1:34 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-12 3:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-12 12:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-13 1:03 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-14 10:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-15 5:48 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-12 12:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: use common ptrace_syscall_enter hook to handle _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 9:36 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: add PTRACE_SYSEMU{,SINGLESTEP} definations to uapi headers Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190304122331.GG3969@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Bin.Lu@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Haibo.Xu@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).