linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
	x86@kernel.org, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:30:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312103051.18086-1-bhe@redhat.com> (raw)

This is v3 post.

The original v1 post can be found here:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180829141624.13985-1-bhe@redhat.com

Later a v1 RESEND version:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190125022817.29506-1-bhe@redhat.com

V2 post is here:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190312005004.19182-1-bhe@redhat.com

This patchset is trying to fix several issues for kexec/kdump when
dynamic switching of paging mode is enabled in x86_64. The current
kernel supports 5-level paging mode, and supports dynamically choosing
paging mode during bootup according to kernel image, hardware and
kernel parameter setting. This flexibility brings several issues for
kexec/kdump:

Issues:
1)
Dynamic switching between paging mode requires code change in target
kernel. So we can't kexec jump from 5-level kernel to old 4-level
kernel which lacks the code change.

2)
Switching from 5-level paging to 4-level paging kernel would fail, if
kexec() put kernel image above 64TiB of memory.

3)
Kdump jumping has similar issue as 2). This require us to only
reserve crashkernel below 64TB, otherwise jumping from 5-level to
4-level kernel will fail.

Note:
Since we have two interfaces kexec_load() and kexec_file_load() to load
kexec/kdump kernel, handling for them is a little different. For
kexec_load(), most of the loading job is done in user space utility
kexec_tools. However, for kexec_file_load(), most of the loading codes
have moved into kernel because of kernel image verification.

Fixes:
a) For issue 1), we need check if XLF_5LEVEL is set, otherwise error out
   a message. 
  -This need be done in both kernel and kexec_tools utility.
  -Patch 2/3 is the handling of kernel part.
  -Will post user space patch to kexec mailing list later.

b) For issue 2), we need check if both XLF_5LEVEL and XLF_5LEVEL_ENABLED
   are set, otherwise error out a message.
  -This only need be done in kexec_tools utility. Because for
   kexec_file_load(), the current code searches area to put kernel from
   bottom to up in system RAM, we usually can always find an area below
   4 GB, no need to worry about 5-level kernel jumping to 4-level
   kernel. While for kexec_load(), it's top down seraching area for kernel
   loading, and implemented in user space. We need make sure that
   5-level kernel find an area under 64 TB for a kexec-ed kernel of
   4-level.
  -Will post user space patch to kexec mailing list later.

c) For issues 3), just limit kernel to reserve crashkernel below 64 TB.
  -This only need be done in kernel.
  -It doesn't need to check bit XLF_5LEVEL or XLF_5LEVEL_ENABLED, we
   just simply limit it below 64 TB which should be enough. Because
   crashernel is reserved during the 1st kernel's bootup, we don't know
   what kernel will be loaded for kdump usage.
  -Patch 3/3 handles this.

Concerns from reviewing comments:
1)
In v1, hpa raised concern that why the paging mode checking is not done
before kexec jumping, the discussion can be found here:

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1809051002020.1416@nanos.tec.linutronix.de

As tglx said, it might be not doable for kdump since kdump kernel's
reserved crashkernel region only owns a portion of memory, may
be above 4G; and might be not safer to do paging mode checking and
switching thing after crash.

2)
In v1 RESEND post, tglx asked why only bit XLF_5LEVEL is checked, even
though two bits XLF_5LEVEL or XLF_5LEVEL_ENABLED added. So add more
words to explain it in *Fixes* b).

Changelog:
v2->v3:
  Change the constant to match the notation for the rest of defines as
  Kirill suggested;
v1->v2:
  Correct the subject of patch 1 according to tglx's comment;
  Add more information to cover-letter to address reviewers' concerns;

Baoquan He (3):
  x86/boot: Add xloadflags bits for 5-level kernel checking
  x86/kexec/64: Error out if try to jump to old 4-level kernel from
    5-level kernel
  x86/kdump/64: Change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation

 arch/x86/boot/header.S                | 12 +++++++++++-
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c     |  5 +++++
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c               | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2


             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-12 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-12 10:30 Baoquan He [this message]
2019-03-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/boot: Add xloadflags bits for 5-level kernel checking Baoquan He
2019-04-05 20:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-06  1:40     ` Baoquan He
2019-03-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/kexec/64: Error out if try to jump to old 4-level kernel from 5-level kernel Baoquan He
2019-04-05 20:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-06  1:39     ` Baoquan He
2019-03-12 10:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] x86/kdump/64: Change the upper limit of crashkernel reservation Baoquan He
2019-04-04  2:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between 5-level and 4-level kernel Baoquan He
2019-04-06  1:43 ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190312103051.18086-1-bhe@redhat.com \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).