linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com,
	Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix TCON DRQ set bits
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:56:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319105648.54i6pd4l74uvp4px@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZCABQ8Sa9+E_nznzMEYpvVm+KrnXDuEgt9qwue9t5Zs8g@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4111 bytes --]

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:28:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:39 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:24:02PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:09 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:49:07PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 9:13 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:05:24PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > TCON DRQ for non-burst DSI mode can computed based on horizontal
> > > > > > > front porch value, but the current driver trying to include sync
> > > > > > > timings along with front porch resulting wrong drq.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch is trying to update the drq by subtracting hsync_start
> > > > > > > with hdisplay, which is horizontal front porch.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Current code:
> > > > > > > ------------
> > > > > > > mode->hsync_end - mode->hdisplay => horizontal front porch + sync
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With this patch:
> > > > > > > ----------------
> > > > > > > mode->hsync_start - mode->hdisplay => horizontal front porch
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BSP code form BPI-M64-bsp is computing TCON DRQ set bits
> > > > > > > for non-burts as (from linux-sunxi/
> > > > > > > drivers/video/sunxi/disp2/disp/de/lowlevel_sun50iw1/de_dsi.c)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > => panel->lcd_ht -    panel->lcd_x - panel->lcd_hbp
> > > > > > > => (timmings->hor_front_porch + panel->lcd_hbp + panel->lcd_x)
> > > > > >                                   ^ + sync length +
> > > > > > >    - panel->lcd_x - panel->hbp
> > > > > > > => timmings->hor_front_porch
> > > > > >                                ^ + sync
> > > > > > > => mode->hsync_start - mode->hdisplay
> > > > > >
> > > > > > s/hsync_start/hsync_end/
> > > > >
> > > > > No, it should be front porch so it is hsync_start. This change is
> > > > > trying to update DRQ set to use front porch and above evaluation from
> > > > > BSP, result the same front front porch
> > > > >
> > > > > Current driver has hsync_end - hdisplay which is not front porch
> > > > > timing (it is adding extra sync timing).
> > > >
> > > > It would be if you considered that the back porch actually was the
> > > > back porch plus the sync length. I have found no such evidence, quite
> > > > the opposite actually, everything seems to point at the fact that
> > > > unlike the TCON, the DSI block uses the back porch as only the back
> > > > porch.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I'm not clear about back porch here.
> > >
> > > The current code has mode->hsync_end - mode->hdisplay which is Front
> > > porch + sync time do you think it's not?
> >
> > It is.
> >
> > > DRQ set time is pure front porch value (according BSP) as I didn't
> > > see any information about DRQ set bits in manual or anywhere.
> >
> > This is what I'm telling you. If you consider the back porch as only
> > the back porch, then the result of that BSP calculation you mentionned
> > earlier is the front porch and the sync length.
> >
> > You imply that the back porch should actually be treated as the back
> > porch and the sync length in your calculation. What makes you say so?
>
> I'm consider the computations accordingly to drm_modes.h and which
> matches similar like BSP code.
>
> mode->hsync_end - mode->hdisplay = front porch + sync
>
> but the actual computation is
> mode->hsync_start - mode->hdisplay =>  front porch
>
> Which is similar to what BSP is using.
>
> => panel->lcd_ht -    panel->lcd_x - panel->lcd_hbp
> => (timmings->hor_front_porch + panel->lcd_hbp + panel->lcd_x)
>    - panel->lcd_x - panel->hbp
> => timmings->hor_front_porch
> => mode->hsync_start - mode->hdisplay

You're missing the point. What I'm asking for is why you think that
panel->lcd_ht == (timmings->hor_front_porch + panel->lcd_hbp +
panel->lcd_x) and not timmings->hor_front_porch + panel->lcd_hbp +
sync_width + panel->lcd_x

maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-03 17:35 [PATCH v9 0/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fixes/updates Jagan Teki
2019-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH v9 1/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix hsync_porch overflow Jagan Teki
2019-03-04 15:54   ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-06 19:02     ` Jagan Teki
2019-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fix TCON DRQ set bits Jagan Teki
2019-03-04 15:43   ` Maxime Ripard
     [not found]     ` <CAMty3ZDWkLWgWhGWBjhXOsmAXzuGKGADAEhzB6gcL+jd7FRazQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-03-07 15:39       ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-07 15:54         ` Jagan Teki
2019-03-11 14:09           ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-11 14:58             ` Jagan Teki
2019-03-19 10:56               ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2019-03-28 11:53                 ` Jagan Teki
2019-04-02 14:47                   ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Support vblk timing for 4-lane devices Jagan Teki
2019-03-04 15:49   ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-07 16:03     ` Jagan Teki
2019-03-11 14:04       ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-11 14:33         ` Jagan Teki
2019-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Support DSI GENERIC_SHORT_WRITE_2 transfer Jagan Teki
2019-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Simplify dsi setup timings code Jagan Teki
2019-03-04 15:50   ` Maxime Ripard
2019-03-07 11:46     ` Jagan Teki
2019-03-18 18:28 ` [PATCH v9 0/5] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Fixes/updates Jagan Teki
2019-03-19 10:58   ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190319105648.54i6pd4l74uvp4px@flea \
    --to=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).