linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] lib/vsprintf: Add %pfw conversion specifier for printing fwnode names
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:10:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327141047.bhndwqde7vjz6bad@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326151307.erqyps6wfvf4on2d@pathway.suse.cz>

Hi Petr,

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:13:07PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2019-03-22 17:29:30, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Add support for %pfw conversion specifier (with "f" and "P" modifiers) to
> > support printing full path of the node, including its name ("f") and only
> > the node's name ("P") in the printk family of functions. The two flags
> > have equivalent functionality to existing %pOF with the same two modifiers
> > ("f" and "P") on OF based systems. The ability to do the same on ACPI
> > based systems is added by this patch.
> > 
> > On ACPI based systems the resulting strings look like
> > 
> > 	\_SB.PCI0.CIO2.port@1.endpoint@0
> > 
> > where the nodes are separated by a dot (".") and the first three are
> > ACPI device nodes and the latter two ACPI data nodes.
> > 
> > Depends-on: ("vsprintf: Remove support for %pF and %pf in favour of %pS and %ps")
> 
> Reusing obsolete modifiers is dangerous from many reasons:
> 
>    + people might miss the change of the meaning
>    + backporting mistakes
>    + 3rd party modules
> 
> It might be acceptable if the long term gain is bigger
> than a short time difficulties. But it would be better
> to it a safe way when possible.
> 
> Fortunately, we could keep the backward compatibility
> for "%pf" and handle only "%pfw*" with the fwnode api.

The v2 of this patch produces a warning (using WARN_ONCE()) for "%pf" not
immediately followed by "w". "%pfw" was not a valid conversion specifier
before this set, so we're actually not re-using the exactly same conversion
specifiers.

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-27 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-22 15:29 [PATCH 0/5] Device property improvements, add %pfw format specifier Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] device property: Add functions for accessing node's parents Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] device property: Add fwnode_get_name for returning the name of a node Sakari Ailus
2019-03-24 17:21   ` Randy Dunlap
2019-03-24 18:19     ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] device property: Add a function to obtain a node's prefix Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] lib/vsprintf: Make use of fwnode API to obtain node names and separators Sakari Ailus
2019-03-27 12:53   ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-27 13:49     ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] lib/vsprintf: Add %pfw conversion specifier for printing fwnode names Sakari Ailus
2019-03-22 17:21   ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-24 18:17     ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 13:13       ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-26 13:39         ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 13:55           ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-26 14:09             ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 15:21             ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-26 14:06         ` Heikki Krogerus
2019-03-26 14:12           ` Sakari Ailus
2019-03-26 14:30             ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-03-26 15:50               ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-26 14:30             ` Heikki Krogerus
2019-03-26 15:13   ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-27 14:10     ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2019-03-28 14:35       ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190327141047.bhndwqde7vjz6bad@paasikivi.fi.intel.com \
    --to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).