From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: jglisse@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>,
"Ross Zwisler" <zwisler@kernel.org>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
"Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mmu notifier provide context informations
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:08:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190409150855.a6cfee7e7c5698a9cd8ecb7c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326164747.24405-1-jglisse@redhat.com>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:47:39 -0400 jglisse@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
>
> (Andrew this apply on top of my HMM patchset as otherwise you will have
> conflict with changes to mm/hmm.c)
>
> Changes since v5:
> - drop KVM bits waiting for KVM people to express interest if they
> do not then i will post patchset to remove change_pte_notify as
> without the changes in v5 change_pte_notify is just useless (it
> it is useless today upstream it is just wasting cpu cycles)
> - rebase on top of lastest Linus tree
>
> Previous cover letter with minor update:
>
>
> Here i am not posting users of this, they already have been posted to
> appropriate mailing list [6] and will be merge through the appropriate
> tree once this patchset is upstream.
>
> Note that this serie does not change any behavior for any existing
> code. It just pass down more information to mmu notifier listener.
>
> The rational for this patchset:
>
> CPU page table update can happens for many reasons, not only as a
> result of a syscall (munmap(), mprotect(), mremap(), madvise(), ...)
> but also as a result of kernel activities (memory compression, reclaim,
> migration, ...).
>
> This patch introduce a set of enums that can be associated with each
> of the events triggering a mmu notifier:
>
> - UNMAP: munmap() or mremap()
> - CLEAR: page table is cleared (migration, compaction, reclaim, ...)
> - PROTECTION_VMA: change in access protections for the range
> - PROTECTION_PAGE: change in access protections for page in the range
> - SOFT_DIRTY: soft dirtyness tracking
>
> Being able to identify munmap() and mremap() from other reasons why the
> page table is cleared is important to allow user of mmu notifier to
> update their own internal tracking structure accordingly (on munmap or
> mremap it is not longer needed to track range of virtual address as it
> becomes invalid). Without this serie, driver are force to assume that
> every notification is an munmap which triggers useless trashing within
> drivers that associate structure with range of virtual address. Each
> driver is force to free up its tracking structure and then restore it
> on next device page fault. With this serie we can also optimize device
> page table update [6].
>
> More over this can also be use to optimize out some page table updates
> like for KVM where we can update the secondary MMU directly from the
> callback instead of clearing it.
We seem to be rather short of review input on this patchset. ie: there
is none.
> ACKS AMD/RADEON https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/1/395
OK, kind of ackish, but not a review.
> ACKS RDMA https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/6/1473
This actually acks the infiniband part of a patch which isn't in this
series.
So we have some work to do, please. Who would be suitable reviewers?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-09 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 16:47 [PATCH v6 0/8] mmu notifier provide context informations jglisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] mm/mmu_notifier: helper to test if a range invalidation is blockable jglisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] mm/mmu_notifier: convert user range->blockable to helper function jglisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] mm/mmu_notifier: convert mmu_notifier_range->blockable to a flags jglisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event enums jglisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] mm/mmu_notifier: contextual information for event triggering invalidation v2 jglisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] mm/mmu_notifier: use correct mmu_notifier events for each invalidation jglisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] mm/mmu_notifier: pass down vma and reasons why mmu notifier is happening v2 jglisse
2019-04-10 23:41 ` Ira Weiny
2019-04-11 5:41 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-04-11 21:50 ` Ira Weiny
2019-04-11 14:39 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-04-11 15:21 ` Weiny, Ira
2019-04-11 17:00 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-26 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] mm/mmu_notifier: mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only() helper jglisse
2019-04-09 14:21 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] mmu notifier provide context informations Jerome Glisse
2019-04-09 22:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-04-10 16:06 ` Jerome Glisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190409150855.a6cfee7e7c5698a9cd8ecb7c@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).