linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	brgl@bgdev.pl, arunks@codeaurora.org, geert+renesas@glider.be,
	mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	ldufour@linux.ibm.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com, mguzik@redhat.com,
	mkoutny@suse.cz, vbabka@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: get_cmdline use arg_lock instead of mmap_sem
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:24:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190430132403.GG2673@uranus.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190430105609.GA23779@blackbody.suse.cz>

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:56:10PM +0200, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:45:17PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It setups these parameters unconditionally. I need to revisit
> > this moment. Technically (if only I'm not missing something
> > obvious) we might have a race here with prctl setting up new
> > params, but this should be harmless since most of them (except
> > stack setup) are purely informative data.
>
> FTR, when I reviewed that usage, I noticed it was missing the
> synchronization. My understanding was that the mm_struct isn't yet
> shared at this moment. I can see some of the operations take place after
> flush_old_exec (where current->mm = mm_struct), so potentially it is
> shared since then. OTOH, I guess there aren't concurrent parties that
> could access the field at this stage of exec.

Just revisited this code -- we're either executing prctl, either execve.
Since both operates with current task we're safe.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-30 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 12:03 [PATCH] mm: get_cmdline use arg_lock instead of mmap_sem Michal Koutný
2019-04-17 13:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-17 14:41   ` Michal Koutný
2019-04-17 14:55     ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-18 13:50       ` [PATCH] prctl_set_mm: downgrade mmap_sem to read lock Michal Koutný
2019-04-18 14:09         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-04-18 14:15         ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-18 14:27         ` Laurent Dufour
2019-04-18 18:23         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-04-30  8:18           ` [PATCH 0/3] Reduce mmap_sem usage for args manipulation Michal Koutný
2019-04-30  8:18             ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: get_cmdline use arg_lock instead of mmap_sem Michal Koutný
2019-04-30  9:09               ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-04-30  9:38                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-04-30  9:53                   ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-04-30 10:45                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-04-30 10:56                       ` Michal Koutný
2019-04-30 13:24                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2019-04-30  8:18             ` [PATCH 2/3] prctl_set_mm: Refactor checks from validate_prctl_map Michal Koutný
2019-04-30  9:27               ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-04-30  8:18             ` [PATCH 3/3] prctl_set_mm: downgrade mmap_sem to read lock Michal Koutný
2019-04-30  8:55               ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-04-30  9:08                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-04-30  9:11                   ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-05-02 12:52                     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Reduce mmap_sem usage for args manipulation Michal Koutný
2019-05-02 12:52                       ` [PATCH v3 1/2] prctl_set_mm: Refactor checks from validate_prctl_map Michal Koutný
2019-05-02 20:57                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-05-02 12:52                       ` [PATCH v3 2/2] prctl_set_mm: downgrade mmap_sem to read lock Michal Koutný
2019-05-02 20:57                         ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2019-05-06  9:28                         ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-05-07 17:42                         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190430132403.GG2673@uranus.lan \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mguzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.cz \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).