From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Bharath Vedartham <linux.bhar@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com,
khalid.aziz@oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Remove VM_BUG_ON in __alloc_pages_node
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:22:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190605142246.GH15685@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605130727.GA25529@bharath12345-Inspiron-5559>
On Wed 05-06-19 18:37:28, Bharath Vedartham wrote:
> [Not replying inline as my mail is bouncing back]
>
> This patch is based on reading the code rather than a kernel crash. My
> thought process was that if an invalid node id was passed to
> __alloc_pages_node, it would be better to add a VM_WARN_ON and fail the
> allocation rather than crashing the kernel.
This makes some sense to me because BUG_ONs are usually a wrong way to
handle wrong usage of the API. On the other hand VM_BUG_ON is special in
the way that production although some distributions enable it by default
IIRC.
> I feel it would be better to fail the allocation early in the hot path
> if an invalid node id is passed. This is irrespective of whether the
> VM_[BUG|WARN]_*s are enabled or not. I do not see any checks in the hot
> path for the node id, which in turn may cause NODE_DATA(nid) to fail to
> get the pglist_data pointer for the node id.
> We can optimise the branch by wrapping it around in unlikely(), if
> performance is the issue?
unlikely will just move the return NULL ouside of the main code flow.
The check will still be done.
> What are your thoughts on this?
I don't know. I would leave the code as it is now or remove the
VM_BUG_ON. I do not remember this would be catching any real issues in
the past.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-05 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-05 6:02 [PATCH] mm: Remove VM_BUG_ON in __alloc_pages_node Bharath Vedartham
2019-06-05 7:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-05 13:07 ` Bharath Vedartham
2019-06-05 14:22 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-06-05 15:55 ` Bharath Vedartham
2019-06-06 5:29 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190605142246.GH15685@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux.bhar@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).