* [PATCH] ARCv2: Don't pretend we may set U & DE bits in STATUS32 with kflag
@ 2019-07-16 20:50 Alexey Brodkin
2019-07-17 18:35 ` Vineet Gupta
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Brodkin @ 2019-07-16 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-snps-arc; +Cc: linux-kernel, Alexey Brodkin
As per PRM "kflag" instruction doesn't change state of
DE-flag ("Delayed branch is pending") and U-flag ("User mode")
in STATUS32 register so let's not act as if we can affect those bits.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
---
arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h
index 225e7df2d8ed..6558e2edb583 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
.macro FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN
lr r9, [status32]
- bic r9, r9, (STATUS_U_MASK|STATUS_DE_MASK|STATUS_AE_MASK)
+ bic r9, r9, STATUS_AE_MASK
or r9, r9, STATUS_IE_MASK
kflag r9
.endm
--
2.16.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARCv2: Don't pretend we may set U & DE bits in STATUS32 with kflag
2019-07-16 20:50 [PATCH] ARCv2: Don't pretend we may set U & DE bits in STATUS32 with kflag Alexey Brodkin
@ 2019-07-17 18:35 ` Vineet Gupta
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vineet Gupta @ 2019-07-17 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Brodkin, linux-snps-arc; +Cc: Alexey Brodkin, linux-kernel
On 7/16/19 1:51 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> As per PRM "kflag" instruction doesn't change state of
> DE-flag ("Delayed branch is pending") and U-flag ("User mode")
> in STATUS32 register so let's not act as if we can affect those bits.
I understand the motivation and indeed bits not writable by kflag should be
removed. But what if we do need to clear those bits out from status32 (assuming
they exist there in first place) and that kflag might not be the right instruction
to do that.
So the question to ask is do we need to clear U and DE bits from status32 and
answer from reading the PRM is no, we don't have to, as those are cleared already
when an exception is taken.
The likely reason this code is because back in arc700 days we used to have a
different version of this macro which atleast in original code relied on using the
pre-exception status32 (in pt_regs) - and that could easily have U and/or DE set
based hence needed clearing.
.macro FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN reg
ld \reg, [sp, PT_status32]
and \reg, \reg, ~(STATUS_U_MASK|STATUS_DE_MASK)
or \reg, \reg, STATUS_L_MASK
sr \reg, [erstatus]
mov \reg, 55f
sr \reg, [eret]
rtie
55:
.endm
This is not needed (even in arc700) if we are using the current "in-exception"
status32 for doing the early return.
Long story short, your patch is correct but we need to explain better why it is.
I've applied it locally with slight tweak to changelog to that effect.
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
> ---
> arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h
> index 225e7df2d8ed..6558e2edb583 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/entry-arcv2.h
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
>
> .macro FAKE_RET_FROM_EXCPN
> lr r9, [status32]
> - bic r9, r9, (STATUS_U_MASK|STATUS_DE_MASK|STATUS_AE_MASK)
> + bic r9, r9, STATUS_AE_MASK
> or r9, r9, STATUS_IE_MASK
> kflag r9
> .endm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-17 18:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-16 20:50 [PATCH] ARCv2: Don't pretend we may set U & DE bits in STATUS32 with kflag Alexey Brodkin
2019-07-17 18:35 ` Vineet Gupta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).