linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [5.2 REGRESSION] Generic vDSO breaks seccomp-enabled userspace on i386
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:03:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190719170343.GA13680@linux.intel.com> (raw)

The generic vDSO implementation, starting with commit

   7ac870747988 ("x86/vdso: Switch to generic vDSO implementation")

breaks seccomp-enabled userspace on 32-bit x86 (i386) kernels.  Prior to
the generic implementation, the x86 vDSO used identical code for both
x86_64 and i386 kernels, which worked because it did all calcuations using
structs with naturally sized variables, i.e. didn't use __kernel_timespec.

The generic vDSO does its internal calculations using __kernel_timespec,
which in turn requires the i386 fallback syscall to use the 64-bit
variation, __NR_clock_gettime64.

Using __NR_clock_gettime64 instead of __NR_clock_gettime breaks userspace
applications that use seccomp filtering to block syscalls, as applications
are completely unaware of the newly added of __NR_clock_gettime64, e.g.
sshd gets zapped on syscall(403) when attempting to ssh into the system.

I can fudge around the issue easily enough, but I have no idea how to fix
this properly without duplicating __cvdso_clock_gettime, do_hres, etc...,
especially now that the i386 vDSO exposes __vdso_clock_gettime64().

             reply	other threads:[~2019-07-19 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-19 17:03 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-07-19 17:40 ` [5.2 REGRESSION] Generic vDSO breaks seccomp-enabled userspace on i386 Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-22 17:16   ` Kees Cook
2019-07-22 18:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-22 18:39       ` Kees Cook
2019-07-22 19:17         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-22 23:28           ` Kees Cook
2019-07-22 23:47             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-23  9:18               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-23 14:04                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-23 15:14                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-23 21:55               ` Kees Cook
2019-07-23 22:55                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-23 22:59                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-23 23:43                   ` Kees Cook
2019-07-23 23:56                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-26 18:01                       ` Sean Christopherson
2019-07-27 17:49                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-27 18:43                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-27 21:52                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-28  0:33                               ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-28  9:57                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-28 10:30                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-28 15:27                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-28 18:14                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-28 18:16                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-28 11:13                             ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190719170343.GA13680@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).