* [RFC PATCH 1/3] cputime: fix a account error of softirq
@ 2019-07-23 6:01 Alex Shi
2019-07-23 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] cputime: unify account_idle_ticks Alex Shi
2019-07-23 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] cputime: unify account_process_tick func Alex Shi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2019-07-23 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Alex Shi, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Wanpeng Li, Thomas Gleixner, linux-kernel
According the comments before this line:
* ksoftirqd time do not get accounted in cpu_softirq_time.
And process in irqtime_account_irq()
I guess the original attempt is to account ksoftirqd into
system time instead of softirq time.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 2305ce89a26c..d78aee140957 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
* So, we have to handle it separately here.
* Also, p->stime needs to be updated for ksoftirqd.
*/
- account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
+ account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SYSTEM);
} else if (user_tick) {
account_user_time(p, cputime);
} else if (p == rq->idle) {
--
2.19.1.856.g8858448bb
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 2/3] cputime: unify account_idle_ticks
2019-07-23 6:01 [RFC PATCH 1/3] cputime: fix a account error of softirq Alex Shi
@ 2019-07-23 6:01 ` Alex Shi
2019-07-23 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] cputime: unify account_process_tick func Alex Shi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2019-07-23 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Alex Shi, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Wanpeng Li, Thomas Gleixner, linux-kernel
Check the 'current' task in account_idle_ticks is meaningless. So we
could remove irqtime_account_idle_ticks and unify this function.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 21 ++++-----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index d78aee140957..3bf94eb7b7c6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -389,15 +389,7 @@ static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SYSTEM);
}
}
-
-static void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks)
-{
- struct rq *rq = this_rq();
-
- irqtime_account_process_tick(current, 0, rq, ticks);
-}
#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
-static inline void irqtime_account_idle_ticks(int ticks) { }
static inline void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
struct rq *rq, int nr_ticks) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
@@ -507,20 +499,15 @@ void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick)
*/
void account_idle_ticks(unsigned long ticks)
{
- u64 cputime, steal;
-
- if (sched_clock_irqtime) {
- irqtime_account_idle_ticks(ticks);
- return;
- }
+ u64 cputime, other;
cputime = ticks * TICK_NSEC;
- steal = steal_account_process_time(ULONG_MAX);
+ other = account_other_time(ULONG_MAX);
- if (steal >= cputime)
+ if (other >= cputime)
return;
- cputime -= steal;
+ cputime -= other;
account_idle_time(cputime);
}
--
2.19.1.856.g8858448bb
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 3/3] cputime: unify account_process_tick func
2019-07-23 6:01 [RFC PATCH 1/3] cputime: fix a account error of softirq Alex Shi
2019-07-23 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] cputime: unify account_idle_ticks Alex Shi
@ 2019-07-23 6:01 ` Alex Shi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2019-07-23 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Alex Shi, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Wanpeng Li, Thomas Gleixner, linux-kernel
The irqtime_account_process_tick path was introduced for precise ns irq
time account from commit abb74cefa9c6 ("sched: Export ns irqtimes
through /proc/stat") while account_process_tick still use jiffes. This
divide isn't necessary especially now both paths are ns precison.
Move out the irqtime_account_process_tick func from IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING.
and combine the code for both *account_process_tick funcs for 2 paths.
Then remove the useless irqtime_account_process_tick().
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
kernel/sched/cputime.c | 84 ++++++------------------------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
index 3bf94eb7b7c6..3cc581409252 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
@@ -332,68 +332,6 @@ void thread_group_cputime(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
-/*
- * Account a tick to a process and cpustat
- * @p: the process that the CPU time gets accounted to
- * @user_tick: is the tick from userspace
- * @rq: the pointer to rq
- *
- * Tick demultiplexing follows the order
- * - pending hardirq update
- * - pending softirq update
- * - user_time
- * - idle_time
- * - system time
- * - check for guest_time
- * - else account as system_time
- *
- * Check for hardirq is done both for system and user time as there is
- * no timer going off while we are on hardirq and hence we may never get an
- * opportunity to update it solely in system time.
- * p->stime and friends are only updated on system time and not on irq
- * softirq as those do not count in task exec_runtime any more.
- */
-static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
- struct rq *rq, int ticks)
-{
- u64 other, cputime = TICK_NSEC * ticks;
-
- /*
- * When returning from idle, many ticks can get accounted at
- * once, including some ticks of steal, irq, and softirq time.
- * Subtract those ticks from the amount of time accounted to
- * idle, or potentially user or system time. Due to rounding,
- * other time can exceed ticks occasionally.
- */
- other = account_other_time(ULONG_MAX);
- if (other >= cputime)
- return;
-
- cputime -= other;
-
- if (this_cpu_ksoftirqd() == p) {
- /*
- * ksoftirqd time do not get accounted in cpu_softirq_time.
- * So, we have to handle it separately here.
- * Also, p->stime needs to be updated for ksoftirqd.
- */
- account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SYSTEM);
- } else if (user_tick) {
- account_user_time(p, cputime);
- } else if (p == rq->idle) {
- account_idle_time(cputime);
- } else if (p->flags & PF_VCPU) { /* System time or guest time */
- account_guest_time(p, cputime);
- } else {
- account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SYSTEM);
- }
-}
-#else /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
-static inline void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
- struct rq *rq, int nr_ticks) { }
-#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */
-
/*
* Use precise platform statistics if available:
*/
@@ -466,26 +404,28 @@ void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, u64 *ut, u64 *st)
*/
void account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick)
{
- u64 cputime, steal;
+ u64 cputime, other;
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
if (vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled())
return;
- if (sched_clock_irqtime) {
- irqtime_account_process_tick(p, user_tick, rq, 1);
- return;
- }
-
cputime = TICK_NSEC;
- steal = steal_account_process_time(ULONG_MAX);
+ other = account_other_time(ULONG_MAX);
- if (steal >= cputime)
+ if (other >= cputime)
return;
- cputime -= steal;
+ cputime -= other;
- if (user_tick)
+ if (this_cpu_ksoftirqd() == p)
+ /*
+ * ksoftirqd time do not get accounted in cpu_softirq_time.
+ * So, we have to handle it separately here.
+ * Also, p->stime needs to be updated for ksoftirqd.
+ */
+ account_system_index_time(p, cputime, CPUTIME_SYSTEM);
+ else if (user_tick)
account_user_time(p, cputime);
else if ((p != rq->idle) || (irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET))
account_system_time(p, HARDIRQ_OFFSET, cputime);
--
2.19.1.856.g8858448bb
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-23 6:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-23 6:01 [RFC PATCH 1/3] cputime: fix a account error of softirq Alex Shi
2019-07-23 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] cputime: unify account_idle_ticks Alex Shi
2019-07-23 6:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] cputime: unify account_process_tick func Alex Shi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).