From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:02:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730160221.GX14271@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1564386957-22833-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:25:57PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in file tree_exp.h,
> fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Queued, thank you very much!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> index af7e7b9..609fc87 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
> @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> * other hand, if the CPU is not in an RCU read-side critical section,
> * the IPI handler reports the quiescent state immediately.
> *
> - * Although this is a greate improvement over previous expedited
> + * Although this is a great improvement over previous expedited
> * implementations, it is still unfriendly to real-time workloads, so is
> * thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code. In fact, if
> * you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, please restructure
> --
> Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
> Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-30 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-29 7:55 [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great" Mukesh Ojha
2019-07-30 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190730160221.GX14271@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mojha@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).