From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@suse.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, hch@lst.de, kan.liang@intel.com,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: correctly check for kthreads
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:55:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190814145537.fx73fwjvshpgdpue@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190814133910.GC51963@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
On 2019-08-14 14:39:10 [+0100], Mark Rutland wrote:
> I think this was missed in commit.
> > 8d3289f2fa1e0 ("x86/fpu: Don't use current->mm to check for a kthread")
>
> Yup, though if it's a bug it's been a bug since commit:
>
> 0cecca9d03c964ab ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state")
>
> ... which I guess the fixes tag would have to mention.
>
> >
> > A kthread with use_mm() would load here non-existing FPU state.
> >
> > Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
>
> Given the above, should I add the fixes tag (for 0cecca9d03c964ab)?
Buh. Either that or hch's commit (8d3289f2fa1e0 ("x86/fpu: Don't use
current->mm to check for a kthread").
That will trigger a stable backport (for 5.2) asking what to do about
is_kthread() so please leave a hint to use the PF_ flag like hch did.
Now that I think about it, even if we end up in kthread with use_mm()
then its FPU state is non-existent which means get_xsave_addr() returns
NULL. This is okay / expected but it triggers the WARN_ONCE().
> Thanks,
> Mark.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-14 10:41 [PATCH 0/9] kthread detection cleanup Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched/core: add is_kthread() helper Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 11:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-14 11:32 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-08-21 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched: treewide: use is_kthread() Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 11:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-14 12:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 13:35 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:37 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] kmemleak: correctly check for kthreads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] arm/perf: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: correctly check for ktrheads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] sparc/perf: correctly check for kthreads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:26 ` David Miller
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/lbr: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 13:39 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 14:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] samples/kretprobe: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:43 ` [PATCH 0/9] kthread detection cleanup Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190814145537.fx73fwjvshpgdpue@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).