linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	kan.liang@intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched/core: add is_kthread() helper
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:26:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV_hZ-uMmKdqEutLL5+XkhhcKdSaurMUS2N46AhZwDNKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190814104131.20190-2-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Hi Mark,

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:43 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> Code checking whether a task is a kthread isn't very consistent. Some
> code correctly tests task->flags & PF_THREAD, while other code checks
> task->mm (which can be true for a kthread which calls use_mm()).
>
> So that we can clean this up and keep the code easy to follow, let's add
> an obvious helper function to test whether a task is a kthread.
> Subsequent patches will use this as part of cleaning up and correcting
> open-coded tests.
>
> At the same time, let's fix up the kerneldoc for is_idle_task() for
> consistency with the new helper, using true/false rather than 0/1, given
> the functions return bool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1621,13 +1621,24 @@ extern struct task_struct *idle_task(int cpu);
>   * is_idle_task - is the specified task an idle task?
>   * @p: the task in question.
>   *
> - * Return: 1 if @p is an idle task. 0 otherwise.
> + * Return: true if @p is an idle task, false otherwise.
>   */
>  static inline bool is_idle_task(const struct task_struct *p)
>  {
>         return !!(p->flags & PF_IDLE);
>  }
>
> +/**
> + * is_kthread - is the specified task a kthread
> + * @p: the task in question.
> + *
> + * Return: true if @p is a kthread, false otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline bool is_kthread(const struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +       return !!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD);

The !! is not really needed.
Probably you followed is_idle_task() above (where it's also not needed).

> +}
> +

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-14 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14 10:41 [PATCH 0/9] kthread detection cleanup Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched/core: add is_kthread() helper Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 11:26   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-08-14 11:32     ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19  8:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-08-21 11:21         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched: treewide: use is_kthread() Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 11:27   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-14 12:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 13:35     ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:37   ` Valentin Schneider
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] kmemleak: correctly check for kthreads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:39   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] arm/perf: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: correctly check for ktrheads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:40   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] sparc/perf: correctly check for kthreads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:26   ` David Miller
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/lbr: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:07   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 13:39     ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 14:55       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] samples/kretprobe: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:43 ` [PATCH 0/9] kthread detection cleanup Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdV_hZ-uMmKdqEutLL5+XkhhcKdSaurMUS2N46AhZwDNKQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).