From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Cooks <acooks@rationali.st>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, platypus-sw@opengear.com,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Will Wagner <willw@carallon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:07:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190814160711.GA5816@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01de7b0c-7579-048b-312c-122dddc23c64@metux.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 833 bytes --]
> > Unfortunately not. I only picked up from where Andrew Cooks left, due
> > to me being way too slow to review his patches.
>
> @Andrew: can you tell us more about this ?
Was the info Andrew supplied helpful to you?
>
> > I was able to test the first 2 patches which fix bugs, but
> > not the 3rd one which deals with ACPI devices. There does not seem to
> > be any such device on the 2 test machines I have remotely access to.
>
> Did you already test on apu2/apu3 ?
> If not, maybe you could prepare a queue that I could test.
Maybe I am missing something but can't you just apply these patches on a
recent kernel?
So, the discussion stalled, but I think the series is fine as is? If
someone disagrees, please speak up. I want to apply patch 1 to
for-current soon and the others to for-next, too.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 12:51 [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus Jean Delvare
2019-08-02 12:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c: piix4: Fix port selection for AMD Family 16h Model 30h Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c: piix4: Fix probing of reserved ports on " Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-02 12:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] i2c: piix4: Add ACPI support Jean Delvare
2019-08-29 20:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-08 9:17 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Enable ACPI-defined peripherals on i2c-piix4 SMBus Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-09 8:33 ` Jean Delvare
2019-08-09 15:53 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-14 16:07 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-08-11 3:09 ` Andrew Cooks
2019-08-11 2:52 ` Andrew Cooks
2019-08-19 18:30 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-19 18:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-20 10:42 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-08-20 10:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-28 22:48 ` Andrew Cooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190814160711.GA5816@kunai \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=acooks@rationali.st \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkml@metux.net \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=platypus-sw@opengear.com \
--cc=willw@carallon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).