Re: [PATCH 10/22] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8150b: Add pon and adc nodes

[Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>]

On 14-08-19, 10:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-08-14 05:50:00)
> > Add the pon and adc nodes found in pm8150b PMIC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
> 
> Squash?

Ok

> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi
> > index c0a678b0f159..846197bd65cd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >  // Copyright (c) 2017-2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> >  // Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
> >  
> > +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> >  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >  #include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> >  
> > @@ -11,6 +12,59 @@
> >                 reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
> >                 #address-cells = <1>;
> >                 #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +               pon@800 {
> 
> Maybe pon node name should be 'key' or 'power-on'?

pon stands for power on device. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/qcom,pon.txt

> 
> > +                       compatible = "qcom,pm8916-pon";
> > +                       reg = <0x0800>;
> > +               };
> > +
> > +               adc@3100 {
> > +                       compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc5";
> > +                       reg = <0x3100>;
> > +                       #address-cells = <1>;
> > +                       #size-cells = <0>;
> > +                       #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> > +                       interrupts = <0x2 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > +
> > +                       ref-gnd@0 {
> > +                               reg = <ADC5_REF_GND>;
> > +                               qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> > +                               label = "ref_gnd";
> > +                       };
> > +
> > +                       vref-1p25@1 {
> > +                               reg = <ADC5_1P25VREF>;
> > +                               qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> > +                               label = "vref_1p25";
> > +                       };
> > +
> > +                       die-temp@6 {
> > +                               reg = <ADC5_DIE_TEMP>;
> > +                               qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> > +                               label = "die_temp";
> > +                       };
> > +
> > +                       chg-temp@9 {
> > +                               reg = <ADC5_CHG_TEMP>;
> > +                               qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> > +                               label = "chg_temp";
> > +                       };
> > +
> > +                       smb1390-therm@14 {
> > +                               reg = <ADC5_AMUX_THM2>;
> > +                               qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>;
> > +                               qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> > +                               label = "smb1390_therm";
> > +                       };
> > +
> > +                       smb1355-therm@78 {
> > +                               reg = <ADC5_AMUX_THM2_100K_PU>;
> > +                               qcom,ratiometric;
> > +                               qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>;
> > +                               qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> > +                               label = "smb1355_therm";
> > +                       };
> 
> Again, are these board level details? Maybe should be provided here with
> status = "disabled" and then added by the boards that use these ADCs.

Sure I will update these

-- 
~Vinod