linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>,
	Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] mmc: core: Fixup processing of SDIO IRQs during system suspend/resume
Date: Tue,  3 Sep 2019 16:22:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903142207.5825-9-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903142207.5825-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

System suspend/resume of SDIO cards, with SDIO IRQs enabled and when using
MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD is unfortunate still suffering from a fragile
behaviour. Some problems have been taken care of so far, but more issues
remains.

For example, calling the ->ack_sdio_irq() callback to let host drivers
re-enable the SDIO IRQs is a bad idea, unless the IRQ have been consumed,
which may not be the case during system suspend/resume. This may lead to
that a host driver re-signals the same SDIO IRQ over and over again,
causing a storm of IRQs and gives a ping-pong effect towards the
sdio_irq_work().

Moreover, calling the ->enable_sdio_irq() callback at system resume to
re-enable already enabled SDIO IRQs for the host, causes the runtime PM
count for some host drivers to become in-balanced. This then leads to the
host to remain runtime resumed, no matter if it's needed or not.

To fix these problems, let's check if process_sdio_pending_irqs() actually
consumed the SDIO IRQ, before we continue to ack the IRQ by invoking the
->ack_sdio_irq() callback.

Additionally, there should be no need to re-enable SDIO IRQs as the host
driver already knows if they were enabled at system suspend, thus also
whether it needs to re-enable them at system resume. For this reason, drop
the call to ->enable_sdio_irq() during system resume.

In regards to these changes there is yet another issue, which is when there
is an SDIO IRQ being signaled by the host driver, but after the SDIO card
has been system suspended. Currently these IRQs are just thrown away, while
we should at least make sure to try to consume them when the SDIO card has
been system resumed. Fix this by calling sdio_signal_irq() after system
resumed the SDIO card.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
index c557f1519b77..3114d496495a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
 		if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD))
 			wake_up_process(host->sdio_irq_thread);
 		else if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ)
-			host->ops->enable_sdio_irq(host, 1);
+			sdio_signal_irq(host);
 	}
 
 out:
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
index d7965b53a6d2..900871073bd7 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
@@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ static void sdio_run_irqs(struct mmc_host *host)
 	mmc_claim_host(host);
 	if (host->sdio_irqs) {
 		process_sdio_pending_irqs(host);
-		host->ops->ack_sdio_irq(host);
+		if (!host->sdio_irq_pending)
+			host->ops->ack_sdio_irq(host);
 	}
 	mmc_release_host(host);
 }
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-03 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 14:21 [PATCH 00/11] mmc: core: PM fixes/improvements for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] mmc: core: Add helper function to indicate if SDIO IRQs is enabled Ulf Hansson
2019-09-04 23:58   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05  7:28     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] mmc: dw_mmc: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05  0:14   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05  7:29     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:01       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 23:47   ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06  9:19     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:37       ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] mmc: mtk-sd: " Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] mmc: core: Move code to get pending SDIO IRQs to a function Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] mmc: core: Clarify sdio_irq_pending flag for MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05  0:34   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05  7:29     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:47   ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06  9:19     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:30       ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-08  9:11         ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] mmc: core: Clarify that the ->ack_sdio_irq() callback is mandatory Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:33   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] mmc: core: WARN if SDIO IRQs are enabled for non-powered card in suspend Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:38   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2019-09-05 18:43   ` [PATCH 08/11] mmc: core: Fixup processing of SDIO IRQs during system suspend/resume Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-06  9:42     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:48   ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06  9:42     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant check in sdhci_ack_sdio_irq() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 18:57   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant code for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] mmc: sdhci: Convert to use sdio_irq_enabled() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 19:02   ` Matthias Kaehlcke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190903142207.5825-9-ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).