linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>,
	Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mmc: dw_mmc: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:29:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFryCPu+VWGoc2CV3dgUN+aLNjH8BC5qPjsbCBpUKN=GqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190905001422.GH70797@google.com>

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 02:14, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:21:58PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > In cases when SDIO IRQs have been enabled, runtime suspend is prevented by
> > the driver. However, this still means dw_mci_runtime_suspend|resume() gets
> > called during system suspend/resume, via pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume().
> > This means during system suspend/resume, the register context of the dw_mmc
> > device most likely loses its register context, even in cases when SDIO IRQs
> > have been enabled.
> >
> > To re-enable the SDIO IRQs during system resume, the dw_mmc driver
> > currently relies on the mmc core to re-enable the SDIO IRQs when it resumes
> > the SDIO card, but this isn't the recommended solution. Instead, it's
> > better to deal with this locally in the dw_mmc driver, so let's do that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> > index eea52e2c5a0c..f114710e82b4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> > @@ -3460,6 +3460,10 @@ int dw_mci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> >       /* Force setup bus to guarantee available clock output */
> >       dw_mci_setup_bus(host->slot, true);
> >
> > +     /* Re-enable SDIO interrupts. */
> > +     if (sdio_irq_enabled(host->slot->mmc))
> > +             __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(host->slot, 1);
> > +
> >       /* Now that slots are all setup, we can enable card detect */
> >       dw_mci_enable_cd(host);
>
> Looks reasonable to me, besides the bikeshedding over
> 'sdio_irq_enabled' (in "mmc: core: Add helper function to indicate
> if SDIO IRQs is enabled").
>
> One thing I wonder is why this change is only needed for dw_mmc and
> mtk-sd, but not for others like sunxi_mmc. Any insights for a SDIO
> newb?

mtk-sd and dw_mmc is using MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD and
sdio_signal_irq(). This is also the case for sdhci, but sdhci is
already internally dealing restoring SDIO IRQs during system resume.

The other host drivers haven't yet converted to
MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD. I have a series for that, not yet
completed and thus not ready to be posted. Once that happens, all host
drivers needs to care about re-enabling SDIO IRQs durings system
resume as well.

For those host that currently doesn't use MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD,
the core wakes up the sdio_irq_thread from mmc_sdio_resume(), which
later will calls the ->enable_sdio_irq().

Perhaps I should add some information about this in the changelog, let
me think about it for the next version.

Kind regards
Uffe

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-05  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-03 14:21 [PATCH 00/11] mmc: core: PM fixes/improvements for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/11] mmc: core: Add helper function to indicate if SDIO IRQs is enabled Ulf Hansson
2019-09-04 23:58   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05  7:28     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/11] mmc: dw_mmc: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05  0:14   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05  7:29     ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2019-09-05 17:01       ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05 23:47   ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06  9:19     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:37       ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/11] mmc: mtk-sd: " Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 04/11] mmc: core: Move code to get pending SDIO IRQs to a function Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] mmc: core: Clarify sdio_irq_pending flag for MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05  0:34   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-05  7:29     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:47   ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06  9:19     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-06 21:30       ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-08  9:11         ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] mmc: core: Clarify that the ->ack_sdio_irq() callback is mandatory Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:33   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] mmc: core: WARN if SDIO IRQs are enabled for non-powered card in suspend Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 17:38   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] mmc: core: Fixup processing of SDIO IRQs during system suspend/resume Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 18:43   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-06  9:42     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 23:48   ` Doug Anderson
2019-09-06  9:42     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant check in sdhci_ack_sdio_irq() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 18:57   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] mmc: sdhci: Drop redundant code for SDIO IRQs Ulf Hansson
2019-09-03 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] mmc: sdhci: Convert to use sdio_irq_enabled() Ulf Hansson
2019-09-05 19:02   ` Matthias Kaehlcke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPDyKFryCPu+VWGoc2CV3dgUN+aLNjH8BC5qPjsbCBpUKN=GqQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).