From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve memset
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 15:10:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190917201021.evoxxj7vkcb45rpg@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190913072237.GA12381@zn.tnic>
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:22:37AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> In order to patch on machines which don't set X86_FEATURE_ERMS, I need
> to do a "reversed" patching of sorts, i.e., patch when the x86 feature
> flag is NOT set. See the below changes in alternative.c which basically
> add a flags field to struct alt_instr and thus control the patching
> behavior in apply_alternatives().
>
> The result is this:
>
> static __always_inline void *memset(void *dest, int c, size_t n)
> {
> void *ret, *dummy;
>
> asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2_REVERSE("rep; stosb",
> "call memset_rep", X86_FEATURE_ERMS,
> "call memset_orig", X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD)
> : "=&D" (ret), "=a" (dummy)
> : "0" (dest), "a" (c), "c" (n)
> /* clobbers used by memset_orig() and memset_rep_good() */
> : "rsi", "rdx", "r8", "r9", "memory");
>
> return dest;
> }
I think this also needs ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT.
Doesn't this break on older non-ERMS CPUs when the memset() is done
early, before alternative patching?
Could it instead do this?
ALTERNATIVE_2("call memset_orig",
"call memset_rep", X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD,
"rep; stosb", X86_FEATURE_ERMS)
Then the "reverse alternatives" feature wouldn't be needed anyway.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-17 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-13 7:22 [RFC] Improve memset Borislav Petkov
2019-09-13 7:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-09-13 7:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-13 8:51 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-13 9:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-13 9:18 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-13 10:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-13 16:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-16 9:18 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-09-16 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-16 17:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-16 21:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-16 23:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-09-16 23:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-17 8:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-17 10:55 ` David Laight
2019-09-17 20:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-09-17 20:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-09-19 12:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-19 12:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-14 9:29 Alexey Dobriyan
2019-09-14 11:39 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190917201021.evoxxj7vkcb45rpg@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).