From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Naveen Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/probe: Fix to check the difference of nr_args before adding probe
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:58:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190930064347.GB19008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190928171158.4b72ab55@oasis.local.home>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> [2019-09-28 17:11:58]:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 02:59:08 -0700
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Fix to check the difference of nr_args before adding probe
> > on existing probes. This also may set the error log index
> > bigger than the number of command parameters. In that case
> > it sets the error position is next to the last parameter.
> >
> > Fixes: ca89bc071d5e ("tracing/kprobe: Add multi-probe per event support")
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>
> I modified the change log a bit, below is the patch I plan on submitting.
>
> You OK with this?
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:53:29 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] tracing/probe: Fix to check the difference of nr_args before
> adding probe
>
> Steven reported that a test triggered:
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880c4f25a48 by task ftracetest/4798
>
> CPU: 2 PID: 4798 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6-test+ #30
> Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v03.03 07/14/2016
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0x7c/0xc0
> ? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
> print_address_description+0x6c/0x332
> ? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
> ? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
> __kasan_report.cold.6+0x1a/0x3b
> ? trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
> kasan_report+0xe/0x12
> trace_kprobe_create+0xa9e/0xe40
> ? print_kprobe_event+0x280/0x280
> ? match_held_lock+0x1b/0x240
> ? find_held_lock+0xac/0xd0
> ? fs_reclaim_release.part.112+0x5/0x20
> ? lock_downgrade+0x350/0x350
> ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x30/0x40
> ? __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.6+0xc1/0xd0
> ? trace_kprobe_create+0xe40/0xe40
> ? trace_kprobe_create+0xe40/0xe40
> create_or_delete_trace_kprobe+0x2e/0x60
> trace_run_command+0xc3/0xe0
> ? trace_panic_handler+0x20/0x20
> ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x30/0x40
> trace_parse_run_command+0xdc/0x163
> vfs_write+0xe1/0x240
> ksys_write+0xba/0x150
> ? __ia32_sys_read+0x50/0x50
> ? tracer_hardirqs_on+0x61/0x180
> ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x43/0x110
> ? mark_held_locks+0x29/0xa0
> ? do_syscall_64+0x14/0x260
> do_syscall_64+0x68/0x260
>
> Fix to check the difference of nr_args before adding probe
> on existing probes. This also may set the error log index
> bigger than the number of command parameters. In that case
> it sets the error position is next to the last parameter.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/156966474783.3478.13217501608215769150.stgit@devnote2
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Fixes: ca89bc071d5e ("tracing/kprobe: Add multi-probe per event support")
> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-30 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-27 9:50 [PATCH] tracing/probe: Test nr_args match in looking for same probe events Steven Rostedt
2019-09-27 13:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-09-27 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-27 17:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-09-28 8:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-09-28 9:56 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-09-28 9:59 ` [PATCH] tracing/probe: Fix to check the difference of nr_args before adding probe Masami Hiramatsu
2019-09-28 21:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-29 8:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-09-30 10:28 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190930064347.GB19008@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).