linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
@ 2019-10-25 11:04 Will Deacon
  2019-10-25 16:06 ` Michel Dänzer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-10-25 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amd-gfx
  Cc: dri-devel, linux-kernel, Will Deacon, Alex Deucher,
	Christian König, David (ChunMing) Zhou, David Airlie,
	Daniel Vetter, Nicolas Waisman

In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
structure.

This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
correct:

Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "David (ChunMing) Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reported-by: Nicolas Waisman <nico@semmle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CADJ_3a8WFrs5NouXNqS5WYe7rebFP+_A5CheeqAyD_p7DFJJcg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---

Compile-tested only.

 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index e81b01f8db90..3e4ef1380fca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -672,17 +672,25 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
 {
 	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
 	struct radeon_crtc *radeon_crtc;
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 	int i;
 
 	radeon_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_crtc) + (RADEONFB_CONN_LIMIT * sizeof(struct drm_connector *)), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (radeon_crtc == NULL)
 		return;
 
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	if (unlikely(!wq)) {
+		kfree(radeon_crtc);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	drm_crtc_init(dev, &radeon_crtc->base, &radeon_crtc_funcs);
 
 	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&radeon_crtc->base, 256);
 	radeon_crtc->crtc_id = index;
-	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = wq;
+
 	rdev->mode_info.crtcs[index] = radeon_crtc;
 
 	if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE) {
-- 
2.24.0.rc0.303.g954a862665-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
  2019-10-25 11:04 [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure Will Deacon
@ 2019-10-25 16:06 ` Michel Dänzer
  2019-10-25 16:18   ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michel Dänzer @ 2019-10-25 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: amd-gfx, David Airlie, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Nicolas Waisman,
	Alex Deucher, Christian König

On 2019-10-25 1:04 p.m., Will Deacon wrote:
> In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
> workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
> NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
> structure.
> 
> This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
> correct:

Neither is this one I'm afraid. See my feedback on
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/331534/ .


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
  2019-10-25 16:06 ` Michel Dänzer
@ 2019-10-25 16:18   ` Will Deacon
  2019-10-25 16:20     ` Michel Dänzer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-10-25 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michel Dänzer
  Cc: amd-gfx, David Airlie, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Nicolas Waisman,
	Alex Deucher, Christian König

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:06:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2019-10-25 1:04 p.m., Will Deacon wrote:
> > In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
> > workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
> > NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
> > structure.
> > 
> > This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
> > correct:
> 
> Neither is this one I'm afraid. See my feedback on
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/331534/ .

Thanks. Although I agree with you wrt the original patch, I don't think
the workqueue allocation failure is distinguishable from the CRTC allocation
failure with my patch. Are you saying that the error path there is broken
too?

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
  2019-10-25 16:18   ` Will Deacon
@ 2019-10-25 16:20     ` Michel Dänzer
  2019-10-31 16:54       ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michel Dänzer @ 2019-10-25 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Will Deacon
  Cc: amd-gfx, David Airlie, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Nicolas Waisman,
	Alex Deucher, Christian König

On 2019-10-25 6:18 p.m., Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:06:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2019-10-25 1:04 p.m., Will Deacon wrote:
>>> In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
>>> workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
>>> NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
>>> structure.
>>>
>>> This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
>>> correct:
>>
>> Neither is this one I'm afraid. See my feedback on
>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/331534/ .
> 
> Thanks. Although I agree with you wrt the original patch, I don't think
> the workqueue allocation failure is distinguishable from the CRTC allocation
> failure with my patch. Are you saying that the error path there is broken
> too?

The driver won't actually work if radeon_crtc_init bails silently, it'll
just fall over at some later point.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure
  2019-10-25 16:20     ` Michel Dänzer
@ 2019-10-31 16:54       ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2019-10-31 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michel Dänzer
  Cc: amd-gfx, David Airlie, linux-kernel, dri-devel, Nicolas Waisman,
	Alex Deucher, Christian König

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:20:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2019-10-25 6:18 p.m., Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:06:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 2019-10-25 1:04 p.m., Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> In the highly unlikely event that we fail to allocate the "radeon-crtc"
> >>> workqueue, we should bail cleanly rather than blindly march on with a
> >>> NULL pointer installed for the 'flip_queue' field of the 'radeon_crtc'
> >>> structure.
> >>>
> >>> This was reported previously by Nicolas, but I don't think his fix was
> >>> correct:
> >>
> >> Neither is this one I'm afraid. See my feedback on
> >> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/331534/ .
> > 
> > Thanks. Although I agree with you wrt the original patch, I don't think
> > the workqueue allocation failure is distinguishable from the CRTC allocation
> > failure with my patch. Are you saying that the error path there is broken
> > too?
> 
> The driver won't actually work if radeon_crtc_init bails silently, it'll
> just fall over at some later point.

Ok, so how about fleshing it out as per below?

Will

--->8

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
index e81b01f8db90..177acee06620 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_display.c
@@ -668,21 +668,29 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs radeon_crtc_funcs = {
 	.page_flip_target = radeon_crtc_page_flip_target,
 };
 
-static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
+static int radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
 {
 	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
 	struct radeon_crtc *radeon_crtc;
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 	int i;
 
 	radeon_crtc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct radeon_crtc) + (RADEONFB_CONN_LIMIT * sizeof(struct drm_connector *)), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (radeon_crtc == NULL)
-		return;
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	wq = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	if (unlikely(!wq)) {
+		kfree(radeon_crtc);
+		return - ENOMEM;
+	}
 
 	drm_crtc_init(dev, &radeon_crtc->base, &radeon_crtc_funcs);
 
 	drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size(&radeon_crtc->base, 256);
 	radeon_crtc->crtc_id = index;
-	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = alloc_workqueue("radeon-crtc", WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
+	radeon_crtc->flip_queue = wq;
+
 	rdev->mode_info.crtcs[index] = radeon_crtc;
 
 	if (rdev->family >= CHIP_BONAIRE) {
@@ -711,6 +719,8 @@ static void radeon_crtc_init(struct drm_device *dev, int index)
 		radeon_atombios_init_crtc(dev, radeon_crtc);
 	else
 		radeon_legacy_init_crtc(dev, radeon_crtc);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static const char *encoder_names[38] = {
@@ -1602,9 +1612,8 @@ int radeon_modeset_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 	rdev->ddev->mode_config.fb_base = rdev->mc.aper_base;
 
 	ret = radeon_modeset_create_props(rdev);
-	if (ret) {
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_drm_mode_config_cleanup;
 
 	/* init i2c buses */
 	radeon_i2c_init(rdev);
@@ -1617,7 +1626,9 @@ int radeon_modeset_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 
 	/* allocate crtcs */
 	for (i = 0; i < rdev->num_crtc; i++) {
-		radeon_crtc_init(rdev->ddev, i);
+		ret = radeon_crtc_init(rdev->ddev, i);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err_drm_mode_config_cleanup;
 	}
 
 	/* okay we should have all the bios connectors */
@@ -1645,6 +1656,10 @@ int radeon_modeset_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
 	ret = radeon_pm_late_init(rdev);
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_drm_mode_config_cleanup:
+	drm_mode_config_cleanup(rdev->ddev);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void radeon_modeset_fini(struct radeon_device *rdev)

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-31 16:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-25 11:04 [PATCH] drm/radeon: Handle workqueue allocation failure Will Deacon
2019-10-25 16:06 ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-25 16:18   ` Will Deacon
2019-10-25 16:20     ` Michel Dänzer
2019-10-31 16:54       ` Will Deacon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).