linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	mst@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
	cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
	rob.miller@broadcom.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com,
	haotian.wang@sifive.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com,
	zhi.a.wang@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, farman@linux.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, sebott@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
	freude@linux.ibm.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, idos@mellanox.com,
	eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com,
	christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 3/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 19:28:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191105192851.40548978.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105104418.1735d800@x1.home>

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 10:44:18 -0700
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:50:25 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue,  5 Nov 2019 17:32:37 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Currently, except for the create and remove, the rest of
> > > mdev_parent_ops is designed for vfio-mdev driver only and may not help
> > > for kernel mdev driver. With the help of class id, this patch
> > > introduces device specific callbacks inside mdev_device
> > > structure. This allows different set of callback to be used by
> > > vfio-mdev and virtio-mdev.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst       | 35 +++++++++----
> > >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c              | 18 ++++---
> > >  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c               | 18 ++++---
> > >  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c             | 14 +++--
> > >  drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c                 | 24 ++++++++-
> > >  drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_private.h              |  5 ++
> > >  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c                 | 37 ++++++-------
> > >  include/linux/mdev.h                          | 43 ++++-----------
> > >  include/linux/mdev_vfio_ops.h                 | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                    | 20 ++++---
> > >  samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                      | 20 ++++---
> > >  samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                      | 18 ++++---
> > >  13 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mdev_vfio_ops.h
> > >     
> > 
> > (...)
> >   
> > > @@ -172,10 +163,34 @@ that a driver should use to unregister itself with the mdev core driver::
> > >  
> > >  	extern void mdev_unregister_device(struct device *dev);
> > >  
> > > -It is also required to specify the class_id in create() callback through::
> > > +As multiple types of mediated devices may be supported, class id needs
> > > +to be specified in the create callback(). This could be done    
> > 
> > The brackets should probably go behind 'create'?
> >   
> > > +explicitly for the device that does not use on mdev bus for its    
> > 
> > "for devices that do not use the mdev bus" ?
> > 
> > But why wouldn't they? I feel like I've missed some discussion here :/  
> 
> The device ops provide a route through mdev-core for known callbacks,
> which is primarily useful when we have 1:N relation between mdev bus
> driver and vendor drivers.  The obvious example here is vfio-mdev,
> where we have GVT-g, vfio-ap, vfio-ccw, NVIDIA GRID, and various sample
> drivers all advertising vfio-mdev support via their class id.  However,
> if we have a tightly coupled vendor driver and mdev bus driver, as the
> mlx5 support that Parav is developing, the claim is that they prefer
> not to expose any device ops and intend to interact directly with the
> mdev device.  At least that's my understanding.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex

Ah, ok.

So maybe use the phrasing "devices that interact with the mdev device
directly" vs "devices that use device-specific ops" instead?

Not a strong critique, though.

> 
> > > +operation through:
> > >  
> > >  	int mdev_set_class(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 id);
> > >  
> > > +For the device that uses on the mdev bus for its operation, the
> > > class    
> > 
> > "For devices that use the mdev bus..."
> > 
> > But same comment as above.
> >   
> > > +should provide helper function to set class id and device
> > > specific +ops. E.g for vfio-mdev devices, the function to be
> > > called is:: +
> > > +	int mdev_set_vfio_ops(struct mdev_device *mdev,
> > > +                              const struct mdev_vfio_device_ops
> > > *vfio_ops); +
> > > +The class id (set by this function to MDEV_CLASS_ID_VFIO) is
> > > used to +match a device with an mdev driver via its id table. The
> > > device +specific callbacks (specified in *vfio_ops) are
> > > obtainable via +mdev_get_vfio_ops() (for use by the mdev bus
> > > driver). A vfio-mdev +device (class id MDEV_CLASS_ID_VFIO) uses
> > > the following +device-specific ops:
> > > +
> > > +* open: open callback of vfio mediated device
> > > +* close: close callback of vfio mediated device
> > > +* ioctl: ioctl callback of vfio mediated device
> > > +* read : read emulation callback
> > > +* write: write emulation callback
> > > +* mmap: mmap emulation callback
> > > +
> > >  Mediated Device Management Interface Through sysfs
> > >  ==================================================    
> > 
> > Otherwise, looks good.  
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05  9:32 [PATCH V8 0/6] mdev based hardware virtio offloading support Jason Wang
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 1/6] mdev: class id support Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 2/6] modpost: add support for mdev class id Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 3/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:50   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05 17:44     ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-05 18:28       ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-11-06  3:48         ` Jason Wang
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 4/6] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:57   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05 17:47   ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-06  3:51     ` Jason Wang
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 5/6] virtio: introduce a mdev based transport Jason Wang
2019-11-05 18:33   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 6/6] docs: sample driver to demonstrate how to implement virtio-mdev framework Jason Wang
2019-11-05 18:35   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05 17:58 ` [PATCH V8 0/6] mdev based hardware virtio offloading support Alex Williamson
2019-11-06  3:56   ` Jason Wang
2019-11-06 19:03     ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-06 19:25       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-06 21:13         ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-07  4:11           ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191105192851.40548978.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com \
    --cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=haotian.wang@sifive.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=idos@mellanox.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=parav@mellanox.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rob.miller@broadcom.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).