linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	mst@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
	cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
	rob.miller@broadcom.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com,
	haotian.wang@sifive.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com,
	zhi.a.wang@intel.com, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch, farman@linux.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, sebott@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
	freude@linux.ibm.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, idos@mellanox.com,
	eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com,
	christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 3/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 11:48:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42afbc46-ac7d-b4d7-9b4a-343b1400d2a8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191105192851.40548978.cohuck@redhat.com>


On 2019/11/6 上午2:28, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 10:44:18 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:50:25 +0100
>> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue,  5 Nov 2019 17:32:37 +0800
>>> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Currently, except for the create and remove, the rest of
>>>> mdev_parent_ops is designed for vfio-mdev driver only and may not help
>>>> for kernel mdev driver. With the help of class id, this patch
>>>> introduces device specific callbacks inside mdev_device
>>>> structure. This allows different set of callback to be used by
>>>> vfio-mdev and virtio-mdev.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../driver-api/vfio-mediated-device.rst       | 35 +++++++++----
>>>>   MAINTAINERS                                   |  1 +
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c              | 18 ++++---
>>>>   drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c               | 18 ++++---
>>>>   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c             | 14 +++--
>>>>   drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c                 | 24 ++++++++-
>>>>   drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_private.h              |  5 ++
>>>>   drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c                 | 37 ++++++-------
>>>>   include/linux/mdev.h                          | 43 ++++-----------
>>>>   include/linux/mdev_vfio_ops.h                 | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                    | 20 ++++---
>>>>   samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                      | 20 ++++---
>>>>   samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                      | 18 ++++---
>>>>   13 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
>>>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mdev_vfio_ops.h
>>>>      
>>> (...)
>>>    
>>>> @@ -172,10 +163,34 @@ that a driver should use to unregister itself with the mdev core driver::
>>>>   
>>>>   	extern void mdev_unregister_device(struct device *dev);
>>>>   
>>>> -It is also required to specify the class_id in create() callback through::
>>>> +As multiple types of mediated devices may be supported, class id needs
>>>> +to be specified in the create callback(). This could be done
>>> The brackets should probably go behind 'create'?
>>>    
>>>> +explicitly for the device that does not use on mdev bus for its
>>> "for devices that do not use the mdev bus" ?
>>>
>>> But why wouldn't they? I feel like I've missed some discussion here :/
>> The device ops provide a route through mdev-core for known callbacks,
>> which is primarily useful when we have 1:N relation between mdev bus
>> driver and vendor drivers.  The obvious example here is vfio-mdev,
>> where we have GVT-g, vfio-ap, vfio-ccw, NVIDIA GRID, and various sample
>> drivers all advertising vfio-mdev support via their class id.  However,
>> if we have a tightly coupled vendor driver and mdev bus driver, as the
>> mlx5 support that Parav is developing, the claim is that they prefer
>> not to expose any device ops and intend to interact directly with the
>> mdev device.  At least that's my understanding.  Thanks,
>>
>> Alex
> Ah, ok.
>
> So maybe use the phrasing "devices that interact with the mdev device
> directly" vs "devices that use device-specific ops" instead?
>
> Not a strong critique, though.


Will use what you suggest here.

Thanks


>
>>>> +operation through:
>>>>   
>>>>   	int mdev_set_class(struct mdev_device *mdev, u16 id);
>>>>   
>>>> +For the device that uses on the mdev bus for its operation, the
>>>> class
>>> "For devices that use the mdev bus..."
>>>
>>> But same comment as above.
>>>    
>>>> +should provide helper function to set class id and device
>>>> specific +ops. E.g for vfio-mdev devices, the function to be
>>>> called is:: +
>>>> +	int mdev_set_vfio_ops(struct mdev_device *mdev,
>>>> +                              const struct mdev_vfio_device_ops
>>>> *vfio_ops); +
>>>> +The class id (set by this function to MDEV_CLASS_ID_VFIO) is
>>>> used to +match a device with an mdev driver via its id table. The
>>>> device +specific callbacks (specified in *vfio_ops) are
>>>> obtainable via +mdev_get_vfio_ops() (for use by the mdev bus
>>>> driver). A vfio-mdev +device (class id MDEV_CLASS_ID_VFIO) uses
>>>> the following +device-specific ops:
>>>> +
>>>> +* open: open callback of vfio mediated device
>>>> +* close: close callback of vfio mediated device
>>>> +* ioctl: ioctl callback of vfio mediated device
>>>> +* read : read emulation callback
>>>> +* write: write emulation callback
>>>> +* mmap: mmap emulation callback
>>>> +
>>>>   Mediated Device Management Interface Through sysfs
>>>>   ==================================================
>>> Otherwise, looks good.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06  3:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05  9:32 [PATCH V8 0/6] mdev based hardware virtio offloading support Jason Wang
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 1/6] mdev: class id support Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:03   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 2/6] modpost: add support for mdev class id Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:06   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 3/6] mdev: introduce device specific ops Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:50   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05 17:44     ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-05 18:28       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-06  3:48         ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 4/6] mdev: introduce virtio device and its device ops Jason Wang
2019-11-05 16:57   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05 17:47   ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-06  3:51     ` Jason Wang
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 5/6] virtio: introduce a mdev based transport Jason Wang
2019-11-05 18:33   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05  9:32 ` [PATCH V8 6/6] docs: sample driver to demonstrate how to implement virtio-mdev framework Jason Wang
2019-11-05 18:35   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-05 17:58 ` [PATCH V8 0/6] mdev based hardware virtio offloading support Alex Williamson
2019-11-06  3:56   ` Jason Wang
2019-11-06 19:03     ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-06 19:25       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-11-06 21:13         ` Alex Williamson
2019-11-07  4:11           ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42afbc46-ac7d-b4d7-9b4a-343b1400d2a8@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=cunming.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=haotian.wang@sifive.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=idos@mellanox.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=parav@mellanox.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rob.miller@broadcom.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).