linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aaron.lwe@gmail.com,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org, pauld@redhat.com,
	jdesfossez@digitalocean.com, naravamudan@digitalocean.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, kernel-team@android.com, john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: Re: NULL pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:27:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106172737.GM5671@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106165437.GX4114@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 05:54:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 06:51:40PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > +	if (!rq->nr_running) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Make sure task_on_rq_curr() fails, such that we don't do
> > > +		 * put_prev_task() + set_next_task() on this task again.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		prev->on_cpu = 2;
> > >  		newidle_balance(rq, rf);
> > 
> > Shouldn't we restore prev->on_cpu = 1 after newidle_balance()? Can't prev
> > become pickable again after newidle_balance() releases rq->lock, and we
> > take it again, so this on_cpu == 2 never will be cleared?
> 
> Indeed so.

Oh wait, the way it was written this is not possible. Because
rq->nr_running == 0 and prev->on_cpu > 0 it means the current task is
going to sleep and cannot be woken back up.

But if I move the ->on_cpu=2 thing earlier, as I wrote I'd do, then yes,
we have to set it back to 1. Because in that case we can get here for a
spurious schedule and we'll pick the same task again.



  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-06 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-28 17:46 NULL pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair Quentin Perret
2019-10-28 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 11:50   ` Quentin Perret
2019-10-30 22:50     ` Ram Muthiah
2019-10-31  1:33       ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-31 10:54         ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-31 14:24           ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-31 22:15       ` Valentin Schneider
2019-11-06 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 13:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 15:04     ` Qais Yousef
2019-11-06 16:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 17:26         ` Qais Yousef
2019-11-06 15:51   ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-06 16:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 17:27       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-11-07  8:36         ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-07 13:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 15:12             ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-07 15:42               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 15:53                 ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-07 15:38             ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-07 18:43               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 19:27                 ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-07 19:31                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 19:42                     ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-07 19:29                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 11:02                   ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-08 11:47                     ` Valentin Schneider
2019-11-08 11:58                       ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-08 12:00                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 12:15                       ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-08 12:35                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 12:24                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 11:55                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 12:52                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 16:09             ` Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191106172737.GM5671@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).