linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aaron.lwe@gmail.com,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org, pauld@redhat.com,
	jdesfossez@digitalocean.com, naravamudan@digitalocean.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
	mgorman@suse.de, kernel-team@android.com, john.stultz@linaro.org
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:29:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191107192907.GA30258@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191107184356.GF4114@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 07:43:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But you mean something like:
> 
> 	for (class = prev->sched_class; class; class = class->next) {
> 		if (class->balance(rq, rf))
> 			break;
> 	}
> 
> 	put_prev_task(rq, prev);
> 
> 	for_each_class(class) {
> 		p = class->pick_next_task(rq);
> 		if (p)
> 			return p;
> 	}
> 
> 	BUG();
> 
> like?

I still havne't had food, but this here compiles...

---
 kernel/sched/core.c      | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 kernel/sched/deadline.c  | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 kernel/sched/fair.c      | 12 ++++++++++--
 kernel/sched/idle.c      |  8 +++++++-
 kernel/sched/rt.c        | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h     |  5 +++--
 kernel/sched/stop_task.c |  8 +++++++-
 7 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index eb42b71faab9..d9909606806d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3929,13 +3929,17 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	}

 restart:
-	/*
-	 * Ensure that we put DL/RT tasks before the pick loop, such that they
-	 * can PULL higher prio tasks when we lower the RQ 'priority'.
-	 */
-	prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf);
-	if (!rq->nr_running)
-		newidle_balance(rq, rf);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	for (class = prev->sched_class;
+	     class != &idle_sched_class;
+	     class = class->next) {
+
+		if (class->balance(rq, prev, rf))
+			break;
+	}
+#endif
+
+	put_prev_task(rq, prev);

 	for_each_class(class) {
 		p = class->pick_next_task(rq, NULL, NULL);
@@ -6201,7 +6205,7 @@ static struct task_struct *__pick_migrate_task(struct rq *rq)
 	for_each_class(class) {
 		next = class->pick_next_task(rq, NULL, NULL);
 		if (next) {
-			next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next, NULL);
+			next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next);
 			return next;
 		}
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 2dc48720f189..b6c3fb10cf57 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1778,15 +1778,9 @@ pick_next_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	return p;
 }

-static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
-	update_curr_dl(rq);
-
-	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
-	if (on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
-		enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
-
-	if (rf && !on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && need_pull_dl_task(rq, p)) {
+	if (!on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && need_pull_dl_task(rq, p)) {
 		/*
 		 * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
 		 * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
@@ -1797,6 +1791,18 @@ static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_fla
 		pull_dl_task(rq);
 		rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
 	}
+
+	return rq->dl.dl_nr_running > 0;
+}
+
+
+static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	update_curr_dl(rq);
+
+	update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
+	if (on_dl_rq(&p->dl) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+		enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
 }

 /*
@@ -2438,6 +2444,7 @@ const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
 	.check_preempt_curr	= check_preempt_curr_dl,

 	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_dl,
+	.balance		= balance_dl,
 	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_dl,
 	.set_next_task		= set_next_task_dl,

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a14487462b6c..6b983214e00f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6746,10 +6746,18 @@ done: __maybe_unused;
 	return NULL;
 }

+static int balance_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+	if (rq->cfs.nr_running)
+		return 1;
+
+	return newidle_balance(rq, rf) != 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Account for a descheduled task:
  */
-static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static void put_prev_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
 	struct sched_entity *se = &prev->se;
 	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
@@ -10609,7 +10617,7 @@ const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
 	.check_preempt_curr	= check_preempt_wakeup,

 	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_fair,
-
+	.balance		= balance_fair,
 	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_fair,
 	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_fair,

diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
index 8dad5aa600ea..2ff65fd2fe7e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -375,7 +375,12 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int fl
 	resched_curr(rq);
 }

-static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+	return 1; /* always runnable */
+}
+
+static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
 }

@@ -456,6 +461,7 @@ const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
 	.check_preempt_curr	= check_preempt_curr_idle,

 	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_idle,
+	.balance		= balance_idle,
 	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_idle,
 	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_idle,

diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index ebaa4e619684..3aa3e0fca796 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1566,20 +1566,9 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	return p;
 }

-static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
-	update_curr_rt(rq);
-
-	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
-
-	/*
-	 * The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
-	 * if it is still active
-	 */
-	if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
-		enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
-
-	if (rf && !on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && need_pull_rt_task(rq, p)) {
+	if (!on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && need_pull_rt_task(rq, p)) {
 		/*
 		 * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being
 		 * picked for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still
@@ -1590,6 +1579,22 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_fla
 		pull_rt_task(rq);
 		rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
 	}
+
+	return rq->rt.rt_queued > 0;
+}
+
+static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	update_curr_rt(rq);
+
+	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
+
+	/*
+	 * The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
+	 * if it is still active
+	 */
+	if (on_rt_rq(&p->rt) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+		enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -2362,6 +2367,7 @@ const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
 	.check_preempt_curr	= check_preempt_curr_rt,

 	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_rt,
+	.balance		= balance_rt,
 	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_rt,
 	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_rt,

diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 0db2c1b3361e..3b50450428dc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1727,7 +1727,8 @@ struct sched_class {
 	struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task)(struct rq *rq,
 					       struct task_struct *prev,
 					       struct rq_flags *rf);
-	void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf);
+	int (*balance)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf);
+	void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
 	void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);

 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1773,7 +1774,7 @@ struct sched_class {
 static inline void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != prev);
-	prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, NULL);
+	prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
 }

 static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
index 7e1cee4e65b2..8a5b3e5540ee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
@@ -60,7 +60,12 @@ static void yield_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
 	BUG(); /* the stop task should never yield, its pointless. */
 }

-static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+static int balance_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
 	u64 delta_exec;
@@ -125,6 +130,7 @@ const struct sched_class stop_sched_class = {
 	.check_preempt_curr	= check_preempt_curr_stop,

 	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_stop,
+	.balance		= balance_stop,
 	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_stop,
 	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_stop,



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-07 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-28 17:46 NULL pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair Quentin Perret
2019-10-28 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 11:50   ` Quentin Perret
2019-10-30 22:50     ` Ram Muthiah
2019-10-31  1:33       ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-31 10:54         ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-31 14:24           ` Valentin Schneider
2019-10-31 22:15       ` Valentin Schneider
2019-11-06 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 13:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 15:04     ` Qais Yousef
2019-11-06 16:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 17:26         ` Qais Yousef
2019-11-06 15:51   ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-06 16:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 17:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07  8:36         ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-07 13:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 15:12             ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-07 15:42               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 15:53                 ` Kirill Tkhai
2019-11-07 15:38             ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-07 18:43               ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 19:27                 ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-07 19:31                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 19:42                     ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-07 19:29                 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-11-08 11:02                   ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-08 11:47                     ` Valentin Schneider
2019-11-08 11:58                       ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-08 12:00                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 12:15                       ` Quentin Perret
2019-11-08 12:35                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 12:24                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 11:55                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-08 12:52                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-07 16:09             ` Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191107192907.GA30258@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).