From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] base: soc: Export soc_device_to_device() helper
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:56:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191111045609.7026-1-afaerber@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191103013645.9856-3-afaerber@suse.de>
Use of soc_device_to_device() in driver modules causes a build failure.
Given that the helper is nicely documented in include/linux/sys_soc.h,
let's export it as GPL symbol.
struct soc_device is local to soc.c, so it can't be inlined into the
header or into driver code.
This still handles only the case that CONFIG_SOC_BUS is enabled.
Same as commit da65a1589dacc7ec44ea0557a14d70a39d991f32 ("base: soc:
Provide a dummy implementation of soc_device_match()") we'd need to
provide a dummy inline implementation to cope with COMPILE_TEST, too.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
drivers/base/soc.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/soc.c b/drivers/base/soc.c
index 4af11a423475..72848587cd51 100644
--- a/drivers/base/soc.c
+++ b/drivers/base/soc.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct device *soc_device_to_device(struct soc_device *soc_dev)
{
return &soc_dev->dev;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(soc_device_to_device);
static umode_t soc_attribute_mode(struct kobject *kobj,
struct attribute *attr,
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-11 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-03 1:36 [RFC 00/11] ARM: Realtek RTD1195/RTD1295 SoC info Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 01/11] dt-bindings: soc: Add Realtek RTD1195 chip info binding Andreas Färber
2019-11-06 4:41 ` Rob Herring
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 02/11] soc: Add Realtek chip info driver for RTD1195 and RTD1295 Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:45 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-11 4:56 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2019-11-11 5:27 ` [PATCH] base: soc: Export soc_device_to_device() helper Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-11 5:42 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-11 6:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-11 20:10 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-12 0:29 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-12 5:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-12 7:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-12 10:47 ` Sense of soc bus? (was: [PATCH] base: soc: Export soc_device_to_device() helper) Andreas Färber
2019-11-14 22:09 ` Rob Herring
2019-11-15 11:15 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-15 11:49 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-15 8:52 ` Neil Armstrong
2019-11-15 8:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-15 12:00 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-15 12:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-18 15:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-11-12 10:48 ` [PATCH] base: soc: Export soc_device_to_device() helper Lee Jones
2020-01-02 14:29 ` [RFC 02/11] soc: Add Realtek chip info driver for RTD1195 and RTD1295 James Tai
2020-01-02 14:39 ` Andreas Färber
2020-01-02 15:02 ` James Tai
2020-01-03 5:07 ` Stanley Chang[昌育德]
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 03/11] arm64: dts: realtek: rtd129x: Add chip info node Andreas Färber
2020-01-02 14:32 ` James Tai
2020-01-03 5:07 ` Stanley Chang[昌育德]
2020-01-02 14:33 ` James Tai
2020-01-02 14:34 ` James Tai
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 04/11] ARM: dts: rtd1195: " Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 05/11] dt-bindings: soc: realtek: rtd1195-chip: Extend reg property Andreas Färber
2019-11-06 4:46 ` Rob Herring
2019-11-06 8:42 ` Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 06/11] soc: realtek: chip: Detect RTD1296 Andreas Färber
2020-01-02 14:35 ` James Tai
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 07/11] arm64: dts: realtek: rtd129x: Extend chip-info reg with CHIP_INFO1 Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 08/11] soc: realtek: chip: Detect RTD1293 Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 09/11] dt-bindings: soc: realtek: rtd1195-chip: Extend reg node again Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 10/11] soc: realtek: chip: Detect RTD1294 Andreas Färber
2019-11-03 1:36 ` [RFC 11/11] arm64: dts: realtek: rtd129x: Extend chip-info reg with efuse Andreas Färber
2019-11-07 7:16 ` [RFC 00/11] ARM: Realtek RTD1195/RTD1295 SoC info Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191111045609.7026-1-afaerber@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).