* [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file_poll()'s return type
@ 2019-11-20 0:06 Luc Van Oostenryck
2019-11-20 5:44 ` Andrew Jeffery
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2019-11-20 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck, Joel Stanley, Andrew Jeffery, linux-aspeed,
linux-arm-kernel
snoop_file_poll() is defined as returning 'unsigned int' but the
.poll method is declared as returning '__poll_t', a bitwise type.
Fix this by using the proper return type and using the EPOLL
constants instead of the POLL ones, as required for __poll_t.
CC: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
CC: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
CC: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
---
drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
index 48f7ac238861..f3d8d53ab84d 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
@@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ static ssize_t snoop_file_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
return ret ? ret : copied;
}
-static unsigned int snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
+static __poll_t snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
struct poll_table_struct *pt)
{
struct aspeed_lpc_snoop_channel *chan = snoop_file_to_chan(file);
poll_wait(file, &chan->wq, pt);
- return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? POLLIN : 0;
+ return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? EPOLLIN : 0;
}
static const struct file_operations snoop_fops = {
--
2.24.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file_poll()'s return type
2019-11-20 0:06 [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file_poll()'s return type Luc Van Oostenryck
@ 2019-11-20 5:44 ` Andrew Jeffery
2019-11-21 2:52 ` Joel Stanley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Jeffery @ 2019-11-20 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luc Van Oostenryck, linux-kernel, Robert Lippert, Patrick Venture
Cc: Joel Stanley, linux-aspeed, linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, at 10:36, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> snoop_file_poll() is defined as returning 'unsigned int' but the
> .poll method is declared as returning '__poll_t', a bitwise type.
>
> Fix this by using the proper return type and using the EPOLL
> constants instead of the POLL ones, as required for __poll_t.
>
> CC: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> CC: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> CC: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> index 48f7ac238861..f3d8d53ab84d 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> @@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ static ssize_t snoop_file_read(struct file *file,
> char __user *buffer,
> return ret ? ret : copied;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
> +static __poll_t snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
> struct poll_table_struct *pt)
> {
> struct aspeed_lpc_snoop_channel *chan = snoop_file_to_chan(file);
>
> poll_wait(file, &chan->wq, pt);
> - return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? POLLIN : 0;
> + return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? EPOLLIN : 0;
Looks fine to me as POLLIN and EPOLLIN evaluate to the same value despite
the type difference.
Patrick, Rob: can you take a look / test?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file_poll()'s return type
2019-11-20 5:44 ` Andrew Jeffery
@ 2019-11-21 2:52 ` Joel Stanley
2019-11-21 10:08 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joel Stanley @ 2019-11-21 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Jeffery
Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Robert Lippert,
Patrick Venture, linux-aspeed, Linux ARM
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 05:42, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, at 10:36, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> > snoop_file_poll() is defined as returning 'unsigned int' but the
> > .poll method is declared as returning '__poll_t', a bitwise type.
> >
> > Fix this by using the proper return type and using the EPOLL
> > constants instead of the POLL ones, as required for __poll_t.
> >
> > CC: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> > CC: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
> > CC: linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org
> > CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Signed-off-by: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> > b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> > index 48f7ac238861..f3d8d53ab84d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> > @@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ static ssize_t snoop_file_read(struct file *file,
> > char __user *buffer,
> > return ret ? ret : copied;
> > }
> >
> > -static unsigned int snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
> > +static __poll_t snoop_file_poll(struct file *file,
> > struct poll_table_struct *pt)
> > {
> > struct aspeed_lpc_snoop_channel *chan = snoop_file_to_chan(file);
> >
> > poll_wait(file, &chan->wq, pt);
> > - return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? POLLIN : 0;
> > + return !kfifo_is_empty(&chan->fifo) ? EPOLLIN : 0;
>
> Looks fine to me as POLLIN and EPOLLIN evaluate to the same value despite
> the type difference.
I assume Luc was using sparse to check:
CHECK ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:112:19: warning: incorrect
type in initializer (different base types)
../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:112:19: expected
restricted __poll_t ( *poll )( ... )
../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:112:19: got unsigned int (
* )( ... )
If you fix the return type:
CHECK ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:106:45: warning: incorrect
type in return expression (different base types)
../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:106:45: expected restricted __poll_t
../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:106:45: got int
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
I will send this to the ARM SOC maintainer. Thanks Luc!
Cheers,
Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file_poll()'s return type
2019-11-21 2:52 ` Joel Stanley
@ 2019-11-21 10:08 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luc Van Oostenryck @ 2019-11-21 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Stanley
Cc: Andrew Jeffery, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Robert Lippert,
Patrick Venture, linux-aspeed, Linux ARM
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 02:52:39AM +0000, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 05:42, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > Looks fine to me as POLLIN and EPOLLIN evaluate to the same value despite
> > the type difference.
>
> I assume Luc was using sparse to check:
>
> CHECK ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:112:19: warning: incorrect
> type in initializer (different base types)
> ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:112:19: expected
> restricted __poll_t ( *poll )( ... )
> ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:112:19: got unsigned int (
> * )( ... )
>
> If you fix the return type:
>
> CHECK ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c
> ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:106:45: warning: incorrect
> type in return expression (different base types)
> ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:106:45: expected restricted __poll_t
> ../drivers/soc/aspeed/aspeed-lpc-snoop.c:106:45: got int
Yes, but with the change s/POLLIN/EPOLLIN/ this last warning
is not issued.
Cheers,
-- Luc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-21 10:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-20 0:06 [PATCH] aspeed: fix snoop_file_poll()'s return type Luc Van Oostenryck
2019-11-20 5:44 ` Andrew Jeffery
2019-11-21 2:52 ` Joel Stanley
2019-11-21 10:08 ` Luc Van Oostenryck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).