linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] mtd: maps: pcmciamtd: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in pcmciamtd_set_vpp()
@ 2019-12-19  3:20 Jia-Ju Bai
  2019-12-19  6:45 ` Dominik Brodowski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jia-Ju Bai @ 2019-12-19  3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: miquel.raynal, richard, vigneshr, linux
  Cc: linux-mtd, linux-kernel, Jia-Ju Bai

The driver may sleep while holding a spinlock.
The function call path (from bottom to top) in Linux 4.19 is:

drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c, 312:
	mutex_lock in pcmcia_fixup_vpp
drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 309:
	pcmcia_fixup_vpp in pcmciamtd_set_vpp
drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 306:
	_raw_spin_lock_irqsave in pcmciamtd_set_vpp

drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c, 312:
	mutex_lock in pcmcia_fixup_vpp
drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 312:
	pcmcia_fixup_vpp in pcmciamtd_set_vpp
drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 306:
	_raw_spin_lock_irqsave in pcmciamtd_set_vp

mutex_lock() may sleep at runtime.

To fix these bugs, the spinlock is replaced with a mutex.

These bugs are found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by
myself.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
v2:
* Change the spinlock to a mutex.
  Thank Dominik for good advice.

---

 drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c
index 70bb403f69f7..2ac79e1cedd9 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c
@@ -294,16 +294,15 @@ static void pcmcia_copy_to(struct map_info *map, unsigned long to, const void *f
 }
 
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pcmcia_vpp_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(pcmcia_vpp_lock);
 static int pcmcia_vpp_refcnt;
 static void pcmciamtd_set_vpp(struct map_info *map, int on)
 {
 	struct pcmciamtd_dev *dev = (struct pcmciamtd_dev *)map->map_priv_1;
 	struct pcmcia_device *link = dev->p_dev;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	pr_debug("dev = %p on = %d vpp = %d\n\n", dev, on, dev->vpp);
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&pcmcia_vpp_lock, flags);
+	mutex_lock(&pcmcia_vpp_lock);
 	if (on) {
 		if (++pcmcia_vpp_refcnt == 1)   /* first nested 'on' */
 			pcmcia_fixup_vpp(link, dev->vpp);
@@ -311,7 +310,7 @@ static void pcmciamtd_set_vpp(struct map_info *map, int on)
 		if (--pcmcia_vpp_refcnt == 0)   /* last nested 'off' */
 			pcmcia_fixup_vpp(link, 0);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcmcia_vpp_lock, flags);
+	mutex_unlock(&pcmcia_vpp_lock);
 }
 
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: maps: pcmciamtd: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in pcmciamtd_set_vpp()
  2019-12-19  3:20 [PATCH v2] mtd: maps: pcmciamtd: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in pcmciamtd_set_vpp() Jia-Ju Bai
@ 2019-12-19  6:45 ` Dominik Brodowski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Brodowski @ 2019-12-19  6:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jia-Ju Bai; +Cc: miquel.raynal, richard, vigneshr, linux-mtd, linux-kernel

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:20:23AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The driver may sleep while holding a spinlock.
> The function call path (from bottom to top) in Linux 4.19 is:
> 
> drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c, 312:
> 	mutex_lock in pcmcia_fixup_vpp
> drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 309:
> 	pcmcia_fixup_vpp in pcmciamtd_set_vpp
> drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 306:
> 	_raw_spin_lock_irqsave in pcmciamtd_set_vpp
> 
> drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c, 312:
> 	mutex_lock in pcmcia_fixup_vpp
> drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 312:
> 	pcmcia_fixup_vpp in pcmciamtd_set_vpp
> drivers/mtd/maps/pcmciamtd.c, 306:
> 	_raw_spin_lock_irqsave in pcmciamtd_set_vp
> 
> mutex_lock() may sleep at runtime.
> 
> To fix these bugs, the spinlock is replaced with a mutex.
> 
> These bugs are found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by
> myself.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>

I presume this will go upstream (with CC to stable -- likely applies to all
longterm kernels still maintained) via MTD? Or should I route it via pcmcia?

Thanks,
	Dominik

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-19  6:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-19  3:20 [PATCH v2] mtd: maps: pcmciamtd: fix possible sleep-in-atomic-context bugs in pcmciamtd_set_vpp() Jia-Ju Bai
2019-12-19  6:45 ` Dominik Brodowski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).