linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/4] mm: enable dump several reasons for __dump_page()
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:55:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120085530.GB18028@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8426f31b-606e-deca-acbe-dd59b193e113@arm.com>

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:42:30AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
>On 01/20/2020 08:34 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> This is a preparation to dump all reasons during check page.
>
>This really makes sense rather then just picking the reason from
>the last "if" statement.
>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/mmdebug.h |  2 +-
>>  mm/debug.c              | 11 ++++++-----
>>  mm/page_alloc.c         |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmdebug.h b/include/linux/mmdebug.h
>> index 2ad72d2c8cc5..f0a612db8bae 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmdebug.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmdebug.h
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
>>  struct mm_struct;
>>  
>>  extern void dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason);
>> -extern void __dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason);
>> +extern void __dump_page(struct page *page, int num, const char **reason);
>>  void dump_vma(const struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>>  void dump_mm(const struct mm_struct *mm);
>>  
>> diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c
>> index 0461df1207cb..a8ac6f951f9f 100644
>> --- a/mm/debug.c
>> +++ b/mm/debug.c
>> @@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ const struct trace_print_flags vmaflag_names[] = {
>>  	{0, NULL}
>>  };
>>  
>> -void __dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason)
>> +void __dump_page(struct page *page, int num, const char **reason)
>>  {
>>  	struct address_space *mapping;
>>  	bool page_poisoned = PagePoisoned(page);
>> -	int mapcount;
>> +	int mapcount, i;
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * If struct page is poisoned don't access Page*() functions as that
>> @@ -97,8 +97,9 @@ void __dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason)
>>  			sizeof(unsigned long), page,
>>  			sizeof(struct page), false);
>>  
>> -	if (reason)
>> -		pr_warn("page dumped because: %s\n", reason);
>> +	pr_warn("page dumped because:\n");
>> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
>> +		pr_warn("\t%s\n", reason[i]);
>
>We should have a NR_BAD_PAGE_REASONS or something to cap this iteration
>and also check reason[i] for non-NULL before trying to print the array.
>There might be call sites like the following which will be problematic
>otherwise.
>
>split_huge_page_to_list() -> dump_page(head, NULL)
>

You are right, I missed this case.

>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>>  	if (!page_poisoned && page->mem_cgroup)
>
>While here, will it be better to move the above debug print block after
>mem_cgroup block instead ?
>

Not sure, let's see whether others have some idea.

>> @@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ void __dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason)
>>  
>>  void dump_page(struct page *page, const char *reason)
>>  {
>> -	__dump_page(page, reason);
>> +	__dump_page(page, 1, &reason);
>>  	dump_page_owner(page);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_page);
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index d047bf7d8fd4..0cf6218aaba7 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static void bad_page(struct page *page, const char *reason,
>>  
>>  	pr_alert("BUG: Bad page state in process %s  pfn:%05lx\n",
>>  		current->comm, page_to_pfn(page));
>> -	__dump_page(page, reason);
>> +	__dump_page(page, 1, &reason);
>>  	bad_flags &= page->flags;
>>  	if (bad_flags)
>>  		pr_alert("bad because of flags: %#lx(%pGp)\n",
>> 
>
>Do we still need to have bad_flags ? After consolidating all reasons making
>a page bad should not we just print page->flags unconditionally each time and
>let the user decipher it instead. __dump_page() will print page->flags for
>each case (atleast after the new patch from Vlastimil). AFAICS, the only
>place currently consuming bad_flags is bad_page() which seems redundant after
>first calling __dump_page().

Hmm... I don't catch this. The work in __dump_page() seems a little different
from this one. Not sure we could remove it.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20  3:04 [Patch v2 0/4] mm/page_alloc.c: cleanup on check page Wei Yang
2020-01-20  3:04 ` [Patch v2 1/4] mm: enable dump several reasons for __dump_page() Wei Yang
2020-01-20  6:12   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-20  8:55     ` Wei Yang [this message]
2020-01-21  5:20       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-22  0:58         ` Wei Yang
2020-01-26  2:44         ` Wei Yang
2020-01-20  3:04 ` [Patch v2 2/4] mm/page_alloc.c: bad_[reason|flags] is not necessary when PageHWPoison Wei Yang
2020-01-20  6:28   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-20 12:13     ` Wei Yang
2020-01-20 10:17   ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-20 12:20   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-20  3:04 ` [Patch v2 3/4] mm/page_alloc.c: pass all bad reasons to bad_page() Wei Yang
2020-01-20  6:33   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-20 12:33     ` Wei Yang
2020-01-20 10:22   ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-20 12:19     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-21  1:49       ` Wei Yang
2020-01-21  6:08     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-21  8:47       ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-20  3:04 ` [Patch v2 4/4] mm/page_alloc.c: extract commom part to check page Wei Yang
2020-01-20  6:43   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-20 12:36     ` Wei Yang
2020-01-21  4:49       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-01-22  1:00         ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120085530.GB18028@richard \
    --to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).