[PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Thomas Richter]

Test case 66 'Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames'
is broken on s390, but works on x86. The test case fails with:

 [root@m35lp76 perf]# perf test -F 66
 66: Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames
           :Recording open file:
 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
 [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.004 MB /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.TCdYj\
	 (20 samples) ]
 Looking at perf.data file for vfs_getname records for the file we touched:
  FAILED!
  [root@m35lp76 perf]#

The root cause of this failure has to do with
commit 88903c464321c ("tracing/probe: Add ustring type for user-space string")
and these changes:
   +         if (strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0)
   +                 fmt = ", __get_str(%s)";
   +          else
   +                 fmt = ", REC->%s";

On x86 __get_str() function is used to print the file name. This is ok
for x86 because kernel and user space are in the same adddress space,
the high bit of the address determines kernel vs user space addresses.

This approach does not work on s390. On s390 kernel und user space are
in different address spaces, both start with address 0x0. Which address
space is currently active is stored in the processor status word (PSW).

Therefore s390 must use 'ustring' for lookup of filename in the user
space address space.

Setting up the kprobe event using perf command:

 # ./perf probe "vfs_getname=getname_flags:72 pathname=filename:ustring"

generates this format file:
  [root@m35lp76 perf]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/probe/\
	  vfs_getname/format
  name: vfs_getname
  ID: 1172
  format:
    field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
    field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
    field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
    field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;

    field:unsigned long __probe_ip; offset:8; size:8; signed:0;
    field:__data_loc char[] pathname; offset:16; size:4; signed:1;

    print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", REC->__probe_ip, REC->pathname
 [root@m35lp76 perf]#

The difference between 'ustring' and 'string' is the print fmt statement
in the last line. Using 'string' generates

  print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", REC->__probe_ip, __get_str(pathname)

This does not work on s390 because __get_str() function does not
know the address space currently being used.

This is the command to generate the perf.data file:

 # ./perf record -e probe:vfs_getname -- touch /tmp/xxx

This command creates the perf.data file which contains the contents
for the kprobe event format file. The call chain is:

  main
  ....
  perf_session__open
  perf_header__process_sections (feature 1 tracing)
  perf_file_section__process
  trace_report
  read_event_files
  read_event_file
  parse_event_file
  tep_parse_event  --> now in lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
  __parse_event
  tep_parse_format
  event_read_format
  event_read_print
  event_read_print_args
  process_args
  process_arg_token --> processes REC->xxx entry of event format file
                        'print fmt' line
  process_entry --> generates argument of type TEP_PRINT_FIELD entry
                    with TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING set in arg->field.field->flags
		    member

Now the difference in the format file between
   [x86] print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", ...,  __get_str(pathname)
and
   [s390] print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", ...,  REC->pathname
comes into play.

In the x86 case the function process_arg_token()
handles in the case TEP_EVENT_ITEM the token "__get_str" and calls
functions

  process_function()
  +--> process_str()

and creates a print argument structure struct tep_print_arg with
type TEP_PRINT_STRING.
This is handled correctly when perf report later prints the argument using
function print_str_arg() in file lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
I omit the 35+ plus function call stack of the gdb where command.

In the s390 case the function process_arg_token()
handles in the case TEP_EVENT_ITEM the token "REC" and calls
function
  process_entry()

This creates a print argument structure struct tep_print_arg with
type TEP_PRINT_FIELD and bit TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING set in flags.

This is handled ***incorrectly** when perf report later prints the
argument using function print_str_arg() in file
lib/traceevent/event-parse.c. There is no support to print a string
when type is TEP_PRINT_FIELD and bit TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING inflags is set.
Again I omit the 35+ plus function call stack of the gdb where command.

Output before:
  [root@m35lp76 perf]# perf report --stdio | egrep '^(# Samp| +[1-9.])+'
  # Samples: 20  of event 'probe:vfs_getname'
  100.00%  (4d2c32) pathname=""

Output after:
  [root@m35lp76 perf]# ./perf report --stdio | egrep '^(# Samp| +[1-9.])+'
  # Samples: 20  of event 'probe:vfs_getname'
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/etc/ld.so.cache"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/etc/ld.so.preload"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/lib64/libc.so.6"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/tmp/xxx"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_ADDRESS"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_COLLATE"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_CTYPE"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_IDENTIFICATION"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MEASUREMENT"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MESSAGES"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MONETARY"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_NAME"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_NUMERIC"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_PAPER"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_TELEPHONE"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_TIME"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib64/gconv/gconv-modules.cache"
  5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/share/locale/locale.alias"
  [root@m35lp76 perf]#

Fix this by adding print string support for TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING
bit set in flags and case TEP_PRINT_FIELD.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
index beaa8b8c08ff..68334f860b27 100644
--- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
+++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
@@ -4003,6 +4003,15 @@ static void print_str_arg(struct trace_seq *s, void *data, int size,
 				trace_seq_printf(s, "%llx", addr);
 			break;
 		}
+		if (field->flags & TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING) {
+			int str_offset;
+
+			str_offset = tep_data2host4(tep, *(unsigned int *)(data + arg->field.field->offset));
+			str_offset &= 0xffff;
+			print_str_to_seq(s, format, len_arg,
+					 ((char *)data) + str_offset);
+			break;
+		}
 		str = malloc(len + 1);
 		if (!str) {
 			do_warning_event(event, "%s: not enough memory!",
-- 
2.21.0

Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:39:41 +0100
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Test case 66 'Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames'
> is broken on s390, but works on x86. The test case fails with:
> 
>  [root@m35lp76 perf]# perf test -F 66
>  66: Use vfs_getname probe to get syscall args filenames
>            :Recording open file:
>  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.004 MB /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.TCdYj\
> 	 (20 samples) ]
>  Looking at perf.data file for vfs_getname records for the file we touched:
>   FAILED!
>   [root@m35lp76 perf]#
> 
> The root cause of this failure has to do with
> commit 88903c464321c ("tracing/probe: Add ustring type for user-space string")
> and these changes:
>    +         if (strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0)
>    +                 fmt = ", __get_str(%s)";
>    +          else
>    +                 fmt = ", REC->%s";
> 

You confused me because those changes are not in commit 88903c464321c.
They are in 40b53b771806b ("tracing: probeevent: Add array type
support").

But reading what you wrote a second time, I'm assuming you mean the
user-space string changes and the above changes together make the
problem.

> On x86 __get_str() function is used to print the file name. This is ok
> for x86 because kernel and user space are in the same adddress space,
> the high bit of the address determines kernel vs user space addresses.
> 
> This approach does not work on s390. On s390 kernel und user space are
> in different address spaces, both start with address 0x0. Which address
> space is currently active is stored in the processor status word (PSW).
> 
> Therefore s390 must use 'ustring' for lookup of filename in the user
> space address space.
> 
> Setting up the kprobe event using perf command:
> 
>  # ./perf probe "vfs_getname=getname_flags:72 pathname=filename:ustring"
> 
> generates this format file:
>   [root@m35lp76 perf]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/probe/\
> 	  vfs_getname/format
>   name: vfs_getname
>   ID: 1172
>   format:
>     field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
>     field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
>     field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1; signed:0;
>     field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
> 
>     field:unsigned long __probe_ip; offset:8; size:8; signed:0;
>     field:__data_loc char[] pathname; offset:16; size:4; signed:1;
> 
>     print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", REC->__probe_ip, REC->pathname

Hmm, that format looks wrong.

>  [root@m35lp76 perf]#
> 
> The difference between 'ustring' and 'string' is the print fmt statement
> in the last line. Using 'string' generates
> 
>   print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", REC->__probe_ip, __get_str(pathname)
> 
> This does not work on s390 because __get_str() function does not
> know the address space currently being used.

I don't think this is the issue, as __get_str() is just a way to handle
dynamic sized strings in the ring buffer. It shouldn't care about
kernel vs user space addresses at all.

> 
> This is the command to generate the perf.data file:
> 
>  # ./perf record -e probe:vfs_getname -- touch /tmp/xxx
> 
> This command creates the perf.data file which contains the contents
> for the kprobe event format file. The call chain is:
> 
>   main
>   ....
>   perf_session__open
>   perf_header__process_sections (feature 1 tracing)
>   perf_file_section__process
>   trace_report
>   read_event_files
>   read_event_file
>   parse_event_file
>   tep_parse_event  --> now in lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
>   __parse_event
>   tep_parse_format
>   event_read_format
>   event_read_print
>   event_read_print_args
>   process_args
>   process_arg_token --> processes REC->xxx entry of event format file
>                         'print fmt' line
>   process_entry --> generates argument of type TEP_PRINT_FIELD entry
>                     with TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING set in arg->field.field->flags
> 		    member
> 
> Now the difference in the format file between
>    [x86] print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", ...,  __get_str(pathname)
> and
>    [s390] print fmt: "(%lx) pathname=\"%s\"", ...,  REC->pathname
> comes into play.
> 
> In the x86 case the function process_arg_token()
> handles in the case TEP_EVENT_ITEM the token "__get_str" and calls
> functions
> 
>   process_function()
>   +--> process_str()
> 
> and creates a print argument structure struct tep_print_arg with
> type TEP_PRINT_STRING.
> This is handled correctly when perf report later prints the argument using
> function print_str_arg() in file lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> I omit the 35+ plus function call stack of the gdb where command.
> 
> In the s390 case the function process_arg_token()
> handles in the case TEP_EVENT_ITEM the token "REC" and calls
> function
>   process_entry()
> 
> This creates a print argument structure struct tep_print_arg with
> type TEP_PRINT_FIELD and bit TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING set in flags.
> 
> This is handled ***incorrectly** when perf report later prints the
> argument using function print_str_arg() in file
> lib/traceevent/event-parse.c. There is no support to print a string
> when type is TEP_PRINT_FIELD and bit TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING inflags is set.
> Again I omit the 35+ plus function call stack of the gdb where command.
> 
> Output before:
>   [root@m35lp76 perf]# perf report --stdio | egrep '^(# Samp| +[1-9.])+'
>   # Samples: 20  of event 'probe:vfs_getname'
>   100.00%  (4d2c32) pathname=""
> 
> Output after:
>   [root@m35lp76 perf]# ./perf report --stdio | egrep '^(# Samp| +[1-9.])+'
>   # Samples: 20  of event 'probe:vfs_getname'
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/etc/ld.so.cache"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/etc/ld.so.preload"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/lib64/libc.so.6"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/tmp/xxx"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_ADDRESS"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_COLLATE"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_CTYPE"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_IDENTIFICATION"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MEASUREMENT"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MESSAGES"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_MONETARY"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_NAME"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_NUMERIC"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_PAPER"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_TELEPHONE"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_TIME"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/lib64/gconv/gconv-modules.cache"
>   5.00%  (4d2c32) pathname="/usr/share/locale/locale.alias"
>   [root@m35lp76 perf]#
> 
> Fix this by adding print string support for TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING
> bit set in flags and case TEP_PRINT_FIELD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> index beaa8b8c08ff..68334f860b27 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> @@ -4003,6 +4003,15 @@ static void print_str_arg(struct trace_seq *s, void *data, int size,
>  				trace_seq_printf(s, "%llx", addr);
>  			break;
>  		}
> +		if (field->flags & TEP_FIELD_IS_STRING) {
> +			int str_offset;
> +
> +			str_offset = tep_data2host4(tep, *(unsigned int *)(data + arg->field.field->offset));
> +			str_offset &= 0xffff;
> +			print_str_to_seq(s, format, len_arg,
> +					 ((char *)data) + str_offset);
> +			break;

This will break static strings.

This looks like a kernel bug, not a libtraceevent parsing bug.

> +		}
>  		str = malloc(len + 1);
>  		if (!str) {
>  			do_warning_event(event, "%s: not enough memory!",

Does this patch fix it for you?

-- Steve

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
index 905b10af5d5c..d3309fceb480 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
@@ -876,7 +876,8 @@ static int __set_print_fmt(struct trace_probe *tp, char *buf, int len,
 	for (i = 0; i < tp->nr_args; i++) {
 		parg = tp->args + i;
 		if (parg->count) {
-			if (strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0)
+			if ((strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0) ||
+			    (strcmp(parg->type->name, "ustring") == 0))
 				fmt = ", __get_str(%s[%d])";
 			else
 				fmt = ", REC->%s[%d]";
@@ -884,7 +885,8 @@ static int __set_print_fmt(struct trace_probe *tp, char *buf, int len,
 				pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
 						fmt, parg->name, j);
 		} else {
-			if (strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0)
+			if ((strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0) ||
+			    (strcmp(parg->type->name, "ustring") == 0))
 				fmt = ", __get_str(%s)";
 			else
 				fmt = ", REC->%s";

Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Hi Steven and Thomas,

On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:07:42 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> This looks like a kernel bug, not a libtraceevent parsing bug.

Totally agreed. It was my fault to update the print format.
Even if still there is a problem on s390, this patch must be
applied.

Fixes: 88903c464321 ("tracing/probe: Add ustring type for user-space string")
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

> 
> > +		}
> >  		str = malloc(len + 1);
> >  		if (!str) {
> >  			do_warning_event(event, "%s: not enough memory!",
> 
> Does this patch fix it for you?
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> index 905b10af5d5c..d3309fceb480 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> @@ -876,7 +876,8 @@ static int __set_print_fmt(struct trace_probe *tp, char *buf, int len,
>  	for (i = 0; i < tp->nr_args; i++) {
>  		parg = tp->args + i;
>  		if (parg->count) {
> -			if (strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0)
> +			if ((strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0) ||
> +			    (strcmp(parg->type->name, "ustring") == 0))
>  				fmt = ", __get_str(%s[%d])";
>  			else
>  				fmt = ", REC->%s[%d]";
> @@ -884,7 +885,8 @@ static int __set_print_fmt(struct trace_probe *tp, char *buf, int len,
>  				pos += snprintf(buf + pos, LEN_OR_ZERO,
>  						fmt, parg->name, j);
>  		} else {
> -			if (strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0)
> +			if ((strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") == 0) ||
> +			    (strcmp(parg->type->name, "ustring") == 0))
>  				fmt = ", __get_str(%s)";
>  			else
>  				fmt = ", REC->%s";


Thank you!

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Steven Rostedt]

On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 01:31:53 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi Steven and Thomas,
> 
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:07:42 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > This looks like a kernel bug, not a libtraceevent parsing bug.  
> 
> Totally agreed. It was my fault to update the print format.
> Even if still there is a problem on s390, this patch must be
> applied.

Thanks Masami for looking into it.

Thomas,

Please still test this patch. If it works, I'd like to add a
Reported-by and Tested-by tag from you.

-- Steve

> 
> Fixes: 88903c464321 ("tracing/probe: Add ustring type for user-space string")
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> 

Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Thomas Richter]

On 1/24/20 5:36 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 01:31:53 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steven and Thomas,
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:07:42 -0500
>> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This looks like a kernel bug, not a libtraceevent parsing bug.  
>>
>> Totally agreed. It was my fault to update the print format.
>> Even if still there is a problem on s390, this patch must be
>> applied.
> 
> Thanks Masami for looking into it.
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> Please still test this patch. If it works, I'd like to add a
> Reported-by and Tested-by tag from you.
> 
> -- Steve
> 
>>
>> Fixes: 88903c464321 ("tracing/probe: Add ustring type for user-space string")
>> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>>

Steven and Masami,

thanks for the patch, it fixes this issue!

PS: I should have sent this description earlier, would have saved a week of debugging
on my side....

-- 
Thomas Richter, Dept 3252, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:23 +0100
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Steven and Masami,
> 
> thanks for the patch, it fixes this issue!

Thanks for letting me know. I'll add a:

  Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>

to the commit.

> 
> PS: I should have sent this description earlier, would have saved a week of debugging
> on my side....

Heh, I do things like this ofter after triggering bugs in others
code, and will spend a few days debugging it, then finding out that
there's already a fix to the bug I find (or presenting the problem
gives a proper fix). I just calk it up as a learning experience ;-)

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:55:53AM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:23 +0100
> Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Steven and Masami,
> > 
> > thanks for the patch, it fixes this issue!
> 
> Thanks for letting me know. I'll add a:
> 
>   Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> to the commit.

So you're taking it, right?

- Arnaldo
 
> > 
> > PS: I should have sent this description earlier, would have saved a week of debugging
> > on my side....
> 
> Heh, I do things like this ofter after triggering bugs in others
> code, and will spend a few days debugging it, then finding out that
> there's already a fix to the bug I find (or presenting the problem
> gives a proper fix). I just calk it up as a learning experience ;-)
> 
> -- Steve

-- 

- Arnaldo

Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test case 66 broken on s390 (lib/traceevent issue)

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:58:04 +0100
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Em Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:55:53AM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:34:23 +0100
> > Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Steven and Masami,
> > > 
> > > thanks for the patch, it fixes this issue!  
> > 
> > Thanks for letting me know. I'll add a:
> > 
> >   Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > to the commit.  
> 
> So you're taking it, right?

Yes (Linus already has it in his tree), because it was a kernel fix. The
tools lib traceevent does not need to be changed for this.

-- Steve