From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
joe@perches.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com
Subject: Checkpatch being daft, Was: [PATCH -v2 08/10] m68k,mm: Extend table allocator for multiple sizes
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 13:30:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207123035.GI14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdW8hWpSsf31P0hC=b23GCx4oFwfaVYKQ1qrZfwFCPK5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:11:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:34 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 11:56:40AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Peter
> > > Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>'
> > > (in all patches)
> > >
> > > I can fix that (the From?) up while applying.
> >
> > I'm not sure where that warning comes from, but if you feel it needs
> > fixing, sure. I normally only add the (Intel) thing to the SoB. I've so
> > far never had complaints about that.
>
> Checkpatch doesn't like this.
Ooh, I see, that's a relatively new warning, pretty daft if you ask me.
Now I have to rediscover how I went about teaching checkpatch to STFU ;-)
Joe, should that '$email eq $author' not ignore rfc822 comments? That
is:
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
and:
Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
are, in actual fact, the same.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-31 12:45 [PATCH -v2 00/10] Rewrite Motorola MMU page-table layout Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 01/10] m68k,mm: Remove stray nocache in ColdFire pgalloc Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 02/10] m68k,mm: Fix ColdFire pgd_alloc() Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 03/10] m68k,mm: Unify Motorola MMU page setup Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 04/10] m68k,mm: Move the pointer table allocator to motorola.c Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 05/10] m68k,mm: Restructure Motorola MMU page-table layout Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 06/10] m68k,mm: Improve kernel_page_table() Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 07/10] m68k,mm: Use table allocator for pgtables Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 08/10] m68k,mm: Extend table allocator for multiple sizes Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-07 10:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-07 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-07 12:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-07 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-02-07 12:33 ` Checkpatch being daft, Was: " Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-09 18:24 ` Joe Perches
2020-02-10 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-10 17:12 ` Joe Perches
2020-02-10 18:52 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Remove email address comment from email address comparisons Joe Perches
2020-02-10 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-10 23:08 ` Joe Perches
2020-02-07 12:57 ` Checkpatch being daft, Was: [PATCH -v2 08/10] m68k,mm: Extend table allocator for multiple sizes Joe Perches
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 09/10] m68k,mm: Fully initialize the page-table allocator Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-07 10:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-07 11:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 12:45 ` [PATCH -v2 10/10] m68k,mm: Change ColdFire pgtable_t Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 13:19 ` [PATCH -v2 00/10] Rewrite Motorola MMU page-table layout Greg Ungerer
2020-02-03 1:20 ` Greg Ungerer
2020-02-01 8:07 ` Michael Schmitz
2020-02-03 9:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-10 11:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-03-09 10:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-03-09 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200207123035.GI14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).