linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [futex] 8019ad13ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -97.8% regression
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:26:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200309082649.GT5972@shao2-debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7yy90ve.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 07:07:17PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> 
> > [ Just a re-send without html crud that makes all the lists unhappy.
> > I'm still on the road, the flight I was supposed to be on yesterday
> > got cancelled.. ]
> >
> > I do note that the futex hashing seems to be broken by that commit. Or
> > at least it's questionable.  It keeps hashing on "both.word",  and
> > doesn't use the u64 field at all for hashing.
> >
> > Maybe I'm mis-reading it - I didn't apply the patch, I just looked at
> > the patch and my source base separately.
> >
> > But the 98% regression sure says something went wrong ;)
> 
> Right you are. The pointer needs to be the starting point as it moved
> ahead of word, which means it starts at word and hashes word and
> offset and an extra u32 beyond the end of the key.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx
> ----
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index e14f7cd45dbd..9f3251349f65 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static inline int hb_waiters_pending(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
>   */
>  static struct futex_hash_bucket *hash_futex(union futex_key *key)
>  {
> -	u32 hash = jhash2((u32*)&key->both.word,
> -			  (sizeof(key->both.word)+sizeof(key->both.ptr))/4,
> +	u32 hash = jhash2((u32*)&key->both.ptr,
> +			  (sizeof(key->both.ptr) + sizeof(key->both.word)) / 4,
>  			  key->both.offset);
>  	return &futex_queues[hash & (futex_hashsize - 1)];
>  }

Hi Thomas,

I have tested the above patch, and the patch can fix the regression.

commit:
  v5.6-rc4
  8019ad13ef ("futex: Fix inode life-time issue")
  8eb641cbc3 ("the fix patch")

        v5.6-rc4  8019ad13ef7f64be44d4f892af  8eb641cbc397e3bbea2a9974e0  testcase/testparams/testbox
----------------  --------------------------  --------------------------  ---------------------------
         %stddev      change         %stddev      change         %stddev
             \          |                \          |                \  
   1083510             -98%      23904                     1078868        will-it-scale/performance-process-100%-futex2-ucode=0x2000065/lkp-skl-fpga01
   1083510             -98%      23904                     1078868        GEO-MEAN will-it-scale.per_process_ops

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-09  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-08 14:02 [futex] 8019ad13ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -97.8% regression kernel test robot
     [not found] ` <CAHk-=wgJV7xrxsTkOG203huPShzZBEC6N_BG0KGwHBmEq4yqWg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-03-08 15:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-08 18:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09  8:26       ` kernel test robot [this message]
2020-03-09  8:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-09  9:34         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09 21:42       ` [tip: locking/urgent] futex: Unbreak futex hashing tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-11  8:20       ` [futex] 8019ad13ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -97.8% regression Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200309082649.GT5972@shao2-debian \
    --to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).