linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

This series aims to add the virtualization of split lock detection for
guest, while containing some fixes of native kernel split lock handling. 

Note, this series is based on the kernel patch[1].

Patch 1 is new added one in this series, that is the enhancement and fix
for kernel split lock detction. It ensure X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT
flag is set after verifying the feature is really supported.
And it explicitly turn off split lock when sld_off instead of assuming
BIOS/firmware leaves it cleared.

Patch 2 optimizes the runtime MSR accessing.

Patch 3-5 are the preparation for enabling split lock detection
virtualization in KVM.

Patch 6-7 fixes the issue in kvm emulator and guest when host truns
split lock detect on.

Patch 8-10 implement the virtualization of split lock detection in kvm.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158031147976.396.8941798847364718785.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

v4:
 - Add patch 1 to rework the initialization flow of split lock
   detection.
 - Drop percpu MSR_TEST_CTRL cache, just use a static variable to cache
   the reserved/unused bit of MSR_TEST_CTRL. [Sean]
 - Add new option for split_lock_detect kernel param.
 - Changlog refinement. [Sean]
 - Add a new patch to enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest. [Sean]

Xiaoyao Li (10):
  x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection
  x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR
  x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for
    split_lock_detect
  x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock()
  x86/split_lock: Add and export several functions for KVM
  kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write
  kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC
    happens in guest
  kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES
  kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest
  x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection

 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |   5 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h                    |  29 ++++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h               |   1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c                   | 119 +++++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c                       |   2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c                          |   7 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c                        |  75 ++++++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h                        |   1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                            |  42 ++++++-
 9 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 01/10] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

Current initialization flow of split lock detection has following issues:
1. It assumes the initial value of MSR_TEST_CTRL.SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT to be
   zero. However, it's possible that BIOS/firmware has set it.

2. X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT flag is unconditionally set even if
   there is a virtualization flaw that FMS indicates the existence while
   it's actually not supported.

Introducing a new sld_state, "sld_not_exist", which is set as the
default value. Only when sld_state != sld_not_exist, it goes to
initialization flow.

In initialization flow, it explicitly accesses MSR_TEST_CTRL and
SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT bit to ensure there is no virtualization flaw.
In detail,
 1. sld_off,   verify SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT bit can be cleared, and clear it;
 2. sld_warn,  verify SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT bit can be cleared and set,
               and set it;
 3. sld_fatal, verify SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT bit can be set, and set it;

Only when no MSR aceessing failure, can X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT be
set. Also, this can avoid using safe version RDMSR/WRMSR at runtime.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index db3e745e5d47..064ba12defc8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -34,17 +34,17 @@
 #endif
 
 enum split_lock_detect_state {
-	sld_off = 0,
+	sld_not_exist = 0,
+	sld_off,
 	sld_warn,
 	sld_fatal,
 };
 
 /*
- * Default to sld_off because most systems do not support split lock detection
  * split_lock_setup() will switch this to sld_warn on systems that support
  * split lock detect, unless there is a command line override.
  */
-static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state = sld_off;
+static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state = sld_not_exist;
 
 /*
  * Processors which have self-snooping capability can handle conflicting
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void init_intel_misc_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	wrmsrl(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, msr);
 }
 
-static void split_lock_init(void);
+static void split_lock_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
 
 static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
@@ -702,7 +702,8 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	if (tsx_ctrl_state == TSX_CTRL_DISABLE)
 		tsx_disable();
 
-	split_lock_init();
+	if (sld_state != sld_not_exist)
+		split_lock_init(c);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
@@ -989,7 +990,6 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
 	char arg[20];
 	int i, ret;
 
-	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT);
 	sld_state = sld_warn;
 
 	ret = cmdline_find_option(boot_command_line, "split_lock_detect",
@@ -1015,6 +1015,8 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
 	case sld_fatal:
 		pr_info("sending SIGBUS on user-space split_locks\n");
 		break;
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1022,39 +1024,61 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
  * Locking is not required at the moment because only bit 29 of this
  * MSR is implemented and locking would not prevent that the operation
  * of one thread is immediately undone by the sibling thread.
- * Use the "safe" versions of rdmsr/wrmsr here because although code
- * checks CPUID and MSR bits to make sure the TEST_CTRL MSR should
- * exist, there may be glitches in virtualization that leave a guest
- * with an incorrect view of real h/w capabilities.
  */
-static bool __sld_msr_set(bool on)
+static void __sld_msr_set(bool on)
 {
 	u64 test_ctrl_val;
 
-	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, &test_ctrl_val))
-		return false;
+	rdmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val);
 
 	if (on)
 		test_ctrl_val |= MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
 	else
 		test_ctrl_val &= ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
 
-	return !wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val);
+	wrmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val);
 }
 
-static void split_lock_init(void)
+/*
+ * Use the "safe" versions of rdmsr/wrmsr here because although code
+ * checks CPUID and MSR bits to make sure the TEST_CTRL MSR should
+ * exist, there may be glitches in virtualization that leave a guest
+ * with an incorrect view of real h/w capabilities.
+ * If not msr_broken, then it needn't use "safe" version at runtime.
+ */
+static void split_lock_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
-	if (sld_state == sld_off)
-		return;
+	u64 test_ctrl_val;
 
-	if (__sld_msr_set(true))
-		return;
+	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, &test_ctrl_val))
+		goto msr_broken;
+
+	switch (sld_state) {
+	case sld_off:
+		if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val & ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
+			goto msr_broken;
+		break;
+	case sld_warn:
+		if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val & ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
+			goto msr_broken;
+		fallthrough;
+	case sld_fatal:
+		if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val | MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
+			goto msr_broken;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT);
+	return;
 
+msr_broken:
 	/*
 	 * If this is anything other than the boot-cpu, you've done
 	 * funny things and you get to keep whatever pieces.
 	 */
-	pr_warn("MSR fail -- disabled\n");
+	pr_warn_once("MSR fail -- disabled\n");
 	sld_state = sld_off;
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

In a context switch from a task that is detecting split locks
to one that is not (or vice versa) we need to update the TEST_CTRL
MSR. Currently this is done with the common sequence:
	read the MSR
	flip the bit
	write the MSR
in order to avoid changing the value of any reserved bits in the MSR.

Cache the value of the TEST_CTRL MSR when we read it during initialization
so we can avoid an expensive RDMSR instruction during context switch.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Originally-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 064ba12defc8..4b3245035b5a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -1020,6 +1020,14 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Soft copy of MSR_TEST_CTRL initialized when we first read the
+ * MSR. Used at runtime to avoid using rdmsr again just to collect
+ * the reserved bits in the MSR. We assume reserved bits are the
+ * same on all CPUs.
+ */
+static u64 test_ctrl_val;
+
 /*
  * Locking is not required at the moment because only bit 29 of this
  * MSR is implemented and locking would not prevent that the operation
@@ -1027,16 +1035,14 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
  */
 static void __sld_msr_set(bool on)
 {
-	u64 test_ctrl_val;
-
-	rdmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val);
+	u64 val = test_ctrl_val;
 
 	if (on)
-		test_ctrl_val |= MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+		val |= MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
 	else
-		test_ctrl_val &= ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+		val &= ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
 
-	wrmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val);
+	wrmsrl(MSR_TEST_CTRL, val);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1048,11 +1054,13 @@ static void __sld_msr_set(bool on)
  */
 static void split_lock_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
-	u64 test_ctrl_val;
+	u64 val;
 
-	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, &test_ctrl_val))
+	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, &val))
 		goto msr_broken;
 
+	test_ctrl_val = val;
+
 	switch (sld_state) {
 	case sld_off:
 		if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val & ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 03/10] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

Change sld_off to sld_disable, which means disabling feature split lock
detection and it cannot be used in kernel nor can kvm expose it guest.
Of course, the X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT is not set.

Add a new optioin sld_kvm_only, which means kernel turns split lock
detection off, but kvm can expose it to guest.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 ++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c                   | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 1ee2d1e6d89a..2b922061ff08 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -4666,7 +4666,10 @@
 			instructions that access data across cache line
 			boundaries will result in an alignment check exception.
 
-			off	- not enabled
+			disable	- disabled, neither kernel nor kvm can use it.
+
+			kvm_only - off in kernel but kvm can expose it to
+				   guest for debug/testing scenario.
 
 			warn	- the kernel will emit rate limited warnings
 				  about applications triggering the #AC
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 4b3245035b5a..3eeab717a0d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
 
 enum split_lock_detect_state {
 	sld_not_exist = 0,
-	sld_off,
+	sld_disable,
+	sld_kvm_only,
 	sld_warn,
 	sld_fatal,
 };
@@ -973,7 +974,8 @@ static const struct {
 	const char			*option;
 	enum split_lock_detect_state	state;
 } sld_options[] __initconst = {
-	{ "off",	sld_off   },
+	{ "disable",	sld_disable },
+	{ "kvm_only",	sld_kvm_only },
 	{ "warn",	sld_warn  },
 	{ "fatal",	sld_fatal },
 };
@@ -1004,10 +1006,14 @@ static void __init split_lock_setup(void)
 	}
 
 	switch (sld_state) {
-	case sld_off:
+	case sld_disable:
 		pr_info("disabled\n");
 		break;
 
+	case sld_kvm_only:
+		pr_info("off in kernel, but kvm can expose it to guest\n");
+		break;
+
 	case sld_warn:
 		pr_info("warning about user-space split_locks\n");
 		break;
@@ -1062,7 +1068,13 @@ static void split_lock_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	test_ctrl_val = val;
 
 	switch (sld_state) {
-	case sld_off:
+	case sld_disable:
+		if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val & ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
+			goto msr_broken;
+		return;
+	case sld_kvm_only:
+		if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val | MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
+			goto msr_broken;
 		if (wrmsrl_safe(MSR_TEST_CTRL, test_ctrl_val & ~MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
 			goto msr_broken;
 		break;
@@ -1087,7 +1099,7 @@ static void split_lock_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * funny things and you get to keep whatever pieces.
 	 */
 	pr_warn_once("MSR fail -- disabled\n");
-	sld_state = sld_off;
+	sld_state = sld_disable;
 }
 
 bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 04/10] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock()
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86/split_lock: Add and export several functions for KVM Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

In the future, KVM will use handle_user_split_lock() to handle #AC
caused by split lock in guest. Due to the fact that KVM doesn't have
a @regs context and will pre-check EFLASG.AC, move the EFLAGS.AC check
to do_alignment_check().

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h  | 4 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 7 ++++---
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c     | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index ff6f3ca649b3..ff567afa6ee1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ unsigned int x86_stepping(unsigned int sig);
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
 extern void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
 extern void switch_to_sld(unsigned long tifn);
-extern bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code);
+extern bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip);
 #else
 static inline void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {}
 static inline void switch_to_sld(unsigned long tifn) {}
-static inline bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
+static inline bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
 {
 	return false;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 3eeab717a0d0..c401d174c8db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -1102,13 +1102,13 @@ static void split_lock_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	sld_state = sld_disable;
 }
 
-bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
+bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
 {
-	if ((regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC) || sld_state == sld_fatal)
+	if (sld_state == sld_fatal)
 		return false;
 
 	pr_warn_ratelimited("#AC: %s/%d took a split_lock trap at address: 0x%lx\n",
-			    current->comm, current->pid, regs->ip);
+			    current->comm, current->pid, ip);
 
 	/*
 	 * Disable the split lock detection for this task so it can make
@@ -1119,6 +1119,7 @@ bool handle_user_split_lock(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 	set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SLD);
 	return true;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_user_split_lock);
 
 /*
  * This function is called only when switching between tasks with
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 0ef5befaed7d..407ff9be610f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_alignment_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 
 	local_irq_enable();
 
-	if (handle_user_split_lock(regs, error_code))
+	if (!(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_AC) && handle_user_split_lock(regs->ip))
 		return;
 
 	do_trap(X86_TRAP_AC, SIGBUS, "alignment check", regs,
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 05/10] x86/split_lock: Add and export several functions for KVM
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

KVM will use split_lock_detect_disabled() and split_lock_detect_on()
in vmx_vcpu_run() to check whether split lock detect can be exposed to
guest and whether host has turned it on. Make them static inline to
avoid the extra CALL+RET in that path.

sld_msr_set() will be used when switching from/to guest.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h  | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index ff567afa6ee1..2e17315b1fed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -41,15 +41,38 @@ unsigned int x86_family(unsigned int sig);
 unsigned int x86_model(unsigned int sig);
 unsigned int x86_stepping(unsigned int sig);
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
+enum split_lock_detect_state {
+	sld_not_exist = 0,
+	sld_disable,
+	sld_kvm_only,
+	sld_warn,
+	sld_fatal,
+};
+extern enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state;
+
+static inline bool split_lock_detect_on(void)
+{
+	return (sld_state == sld_warn) || (sld_state == sld_fatal);
+}
+
+static inline bool split_lock_detect_disabled(void)
+{
+	return sld_state == sld_disable;
+}
+
 extern void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
 extern void switch_to_sld(unsigned long tifn);
 extern bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip);
+extern void sld_msr_set(bool on);
 #else
+static inline bool split_lock_detect_on(void) { return false; }
+static inline bool split_lock_detect_disabled(void) { return true; }
 static inline void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {}
 static inline void switch_to_sld(unsigned long tifn) {}
 static inline bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
 {
 	return false;
 }
+static inline void sld_msr_set(bool on) {}
 #endif
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index c401d174c8db..8bfe8b07e06e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -33,19 +33,12 @@
 #include <asm/apic.h>
 #endif
 
-enum split_lock_detect_state {
-	sld_not_exist = 0,
-	sld_disable,
-	sld_kvm_only,
-	sld_warn,
-	sld_fatal,
-};
-
 /*
  * split_lock_setup() will switch this to sld_warn on systems that support
  * split lock detect, unless there is a command line override.
  */
-static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state = sld_not_exist;
+enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state = sld_not_exist;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sld_state);
 
 /*
  * Processors which have self-snooping capability can handle conflicting
@@ -1121,6 +1114,12 @@ bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_user_split_lock);
 
+void sld_msr_set(bool on)
+{
+	__sld_msr_set(on);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sld_msr_set);
+
 /*
  * This function is called only when switching between tasks with
  * different split-lock detection modes. It sets the MSR for the
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 06/10] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86/split_lock: Add and export several functions for KVM Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

If split lock detect is enabled (warn/fatal), #AC handler calls die()
when split lock happens in kernel.

Malicous guest can exploit the KVM emulator to trigger split lock #AC
in kernel[1]. So just emulating the access as a write if it's a
split-lock access (the same as access spans page) to avoid malicious
attacking kernel.

More discussion can be found [2][3].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8c5b11c9-58df-38e7-a514-dc12d687b198@redhat.com/
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200131200134.GD18946@linux.intel.com
[3] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227001117.GX9940@linux.intel.com

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 5de200663f51..1a0e6c0b1b39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5873,6 +5873,7 @@ static int emulator_cmpxchg_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 {
 	struct kvm_host_map map;
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = emul_to_vcpu(ctxt);
+	u64 page_line_mask = PAGE_MASK;
 	gpa_t gpa;
 	char *kaddr;
 	bool exchanged;
@@ -5887,7 +5888,11 @@ static int emulator_cmpxchg_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 	    (gpa & PAGE_MASK) == APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE)
 		goto emul_write;
 
-	if (((gpa + bytes - 1) & PAGE_MASK) != (gpa & PAGE_MASK))
+	if (split_lock_detect_on())
+		page_line_mask = ~(cache_line_size() - 1);
+
+	/* when write spans page or spans cache when SLD enabled */
+	if (((gpa + bytes - 1) & page_line_mask) != (gpa & page_line_mask))
 		goto emul_write;
 
 	if (kvm_vcpu_map(vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(gpa), &map))
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 07/10] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

There are two types of #AC can be generated in Intel CPUs:
 1. legacy alignment check #AC;
 2. split lock #AC;

Legacy alignment check #AC can be injected to guest if guest has enabled
alignemnet check.

when host enables split lock detectin, i.e., sld_warn or sld_fatal,
there will be an unexpected #AC in guest and intercepted by KVM because
KVM doesn't virtualize this feature to guest and hardware value of
MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD bit stays unchanged when vcpu is running.

To handle this unexpected #AC, treat guest just like host usermode that
calling handle_user_split_lock():
 - If host is sld_warn, it warns and set TIF_SLD so that __switch_to_xtra()
   does the MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD bit switching when control transfer to/from
   this vcpu.
 - If host is sld_fatal, forward #AC to userspace, the similar as sending
   SIGBUS.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 40b1e6138cd5..3fb132ad489d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -4609,6 +4609,12 @@ static int handle_machine_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static inline bool guest_cpu_alignment_check_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	return vmx_get_cpl(vcpu) == 3 && kvm_read_cr0_bits(vcpu, X86_CR0_AM) &&
+	       (kvm_get_rflags(vcpu) & X86_EFLAGS_AC);
+}
+
 static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
@@ -4674,9 +4680,6 @@ static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		return handle_rmode_exception(vcpu, ex_no, error_code);
 
 	switch (ex_no) {
-	case AC_VECTOR:
-		kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, AC_VECTOR, error_code);
-		return 1;
 	case DB_VECTOR:
 		dr6 = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
 		if (!(vcpu->guest_debug &
@@ -4705,6 +4708,27 @@ static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		kvm_run->debug.arch.pc = vmcs_readl(GUEST_CS_BASE) + rip;
 		kvm_run->debug.arch.exception = ex_no;
 		break;
+	case AC_VECTOR:
+		/*
+		 * Reflect #AC to the guest if it's expecting the #AC, i.e. has
+		 * legacy alignment check enabled.  Pre-check host split lock
+		 * support to avoid the VMREADs needed to check legacy #AC,
+		 * i.e. reflect the #AC if the only possible source is legacy
+		 * alignment checks.
+		 */
+		if (!split_lock_detect_on() ||
+		    guest_cpu_alignment_check_enabled(vcpu)) {
+			kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, AC_VECTOR, error_code);
+			return 1;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * Forward the #AC to userspace if kernel policy does not allow
+		 * temporarily disabling split lock detection.
+		 */
+		if (handle_user_split_lock(kvm_rip_read(vcpu)))
+			return 1;
+		fallthrough;
 	default:
 		kvm_run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_EXCEPTION;
 		kvm_run->ex.exception = ex_no;
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 08/10] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

Emulate MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES in software and unconditionally
advertise its support to userspace. Like MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, it
is a feature-enumerating MSR and can be fully emulated regardless of
hardware support. Existence of CORE_CAPABILITIES is enumerated via
CPUID.(EAX=7H,ECX=0):EDX[30].

Note, support for individual features enumerated via CORE_CAPABILITIES,
e.g., split lock detection, will be added in future patches.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c            |  7 ++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 98959e8cd448..d538c9f51a09 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	u64 ia32_xss;
 	u64 microcode_version;
 	u64 arch_capabilities;
+	u64 core_capabilities;
 
 	/*
 	 * Paging state of the vcpu
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index b1c469446b07..344cd605ecaa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static inline void do_cpuid_7_mask(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, int index)
 	const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features =
 		F(AVX512_4VNNIW) | F(AVX512_4FMAPS) | F(SPEC_CTRL) |
 		F(SPEC_CTRL_SSBD) | F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES) | F(INTEL_STIBP) |
-		F(MD_CLEAR);
+		F(MD_CLEAR) | F(CORE_CAPABILITIES);
 
 	/* cpuid 7.1.eax */
 	const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_1_eax_x86_features =
@@ -409,10 +409,11 @@ static inline void do_cpuid_7_mask(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, int index)
 		    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
 			entry->edx |= F(SPEC_CTRL_SSBD);
 		/*
-		 * We emulate ARCH_CAPABILITIES in software even
-		 * if the host doesn't support it.
+		 * ARCH_CAPABILITIES and CORE_CAPABILITIES are emulated in
+		 * software regardless of host support.
 		 */
 		entry->edx |= F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES);
+		entry->edx |= F(CORE_CAPABILITIES);
 		break;
 	case 1:
 		entry->eax &= kvm_cpuid_7_1_eax_x86_features;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1a0e6c0b1b39..72d4bfea8864 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1221,6 +1221,7 @@ static const u32 emulated_msrs_all[] = {
 	MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST,
 	MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE,
 	MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
+	MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
 	MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
 	MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS,
 	MSR_IA32_MCG_CTL,
@@ -1287,6 +1288,7 @@ static const u32 msr_based_features_all[] = {
 	MSR_F10H_DECFG,
 	MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV,
 	MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
+	MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS,
 };
 
 static u32 msr_based_features[ARRAY_SIZE(msr_based_features_all)];
@@ -1340,12 +1342,20 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
 	return data;
 }
 
+static u64 kvm_get_core_capabilities(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
 {
 	switch (msr->index) {
 	case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
 		msr->data = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
 		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
+		msr->data = kvm_get_core_capabilities();
+		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
 		rdmsrl_safe(msr->index, &msr->data);
 		break;
@@ -2718,6 +2728,11 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 			return 1;
 		vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = data;
 		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
+		if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
+			return 1;
+		vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = data;
+		break;
 	case MSR_EFER:
 		return set_efer(vcpu, msr_info);
 	case MSR_K7_HWCR:
@@ -3046,6 +3061,12 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 			return 1;
 		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities;
 		break;
+	case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
+		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
+		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITIES))
+			return 1;
+		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.core_capabilities;
+		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL:
 		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_power_ctl;
 		break;
@@ -9348,6 +9369,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		goto free_guest_fpu;
 
 	vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
+	vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = kvm_get_core_capabilities();
 	vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
 	kvm_vcpu_mtrr_init(vcpu);
 	vcpu_load(vcpu);
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 09/10] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

Only enabling the read and write zero of MSR_TEST_CTRL. This makes
MSR_TEST_CTRL always available for intel guest, but guset cannot write any
value to it except zero.

This matches the truth that most Intel CPUs support MSR_TEST_CTRL, and
it also alleviates the effort to handle wrmsr/rdmsr when exposing split
lock detect to guest in the following patch.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 3fb132ad489d..107c873b23c2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1831,6 +1831,9 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 	u32 index;
 
 	switch (msr_info->index) {
+	case MSR_TEST_CTRL:
+		msr_info->data = vmx->msr_test_ctrl;
+		break;
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	case MSR_FS_BASE:
 		msr_info->data = vmcs_readl(GUEST_FS_BASE);
@@ -1984,6 +1987,12 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 	u32 index;
 
 	switch (msr_index) {
+	case MSR_TEST_CTRL:
+		if (data)
+			return 1;
+
+		vmx->msr_test_ctrl = data;
+		break;
 	case MSR_EFER:
 		ret = kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr_info);
 		break;
@@ -4283,6 +4292,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
 
 	vmx->rmode.vm86_active = 0;
 	vmx->spec_ctrl = 0;
+	vmx->msr_test_ctrl = 0;
 
 	vmx->msr_ia32_umwait_control = 0;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index e64da06c7009..f679453dcab8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
 #endif
 
 	u64		      spec_ctrl;
+	u64		      msr_test_ctrl;
 	u32		      msr_ia32_umwait_control;
 
 	u32 secondary_exec_control;
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 10/10] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection
  2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-14  7:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
  2020-03-15  2:56   ` Xiaoyao Li
  9 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-14  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel, Xiaoyao Li

Due to the fact that MSR_TEST_CTRL is per-core scope, i.e., the sibling
threads in the same physical CPU core share the same MSR, only
advertising feature split lock detection to guest when SMT is disabled
or unsupported, for simplicitly.

Below summarizing how guest behaves of different host configuration:

  sld_fatal - hardware MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is always on when vcpu is running,
              even though guest thinks it sets/clears MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD
	      bit successfully. i.e., SLD is forced on for guest.

  sld_warn - hardware MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is left on until an #AC is
	     intercepted with MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD=0 in the guest, at which
	     point normal sld_warn rules apply, i.e., clear
	     MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD bit and set TIF_SLD.
	     If a vCPU associated with the task does VM-Enter with
	     virtual MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD=1, TIF_SLD is reset, hardware
	     MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is re-set, and cycle begins anew.

  sld_kvm_only - hardware MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is set on VM-Entry and cleared
		 onVM-Exit if guest enables SLD, i.e., guest's virtual
	         MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is set.

  sld_disable - guest cannot see feature split lock detection.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h  |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |  7 ++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c      | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c          | 17 +++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
index 2e17315b1fed..284be32aaf87 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ extern void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
 extern void switch_to_sld(unsigned long tifn);
 extern bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip);
 extern void sld_msr_set(bool on);
+extern void sld_turn_back_on(void);
 #else
 static inline bool split_lock_detect_on(void) { return false; }
 static inline bool split_lock_detect_disabled(void) { return true; }
@@ -74,5 +75,6 @@ static inline bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
 	return false;
 }
 static inline void sld_msr_set(bool on) {}
+static inline void sld_turn_back_on(void) {}
 #endif
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 8bfe8b07e06e..de46e1d3f1c7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -1120,6 +1120,13 @@ void sld_msr_set(bool on)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sld_msr_set);
 
+void sld_turn_back_on(void)
+{
+	__sld_msr_set(true);
+	clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SLD);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sld_turn_back_on);
+
 /*
  * This function is called only when switching between tasks with
  * different split-lock detection modes. It sets the MSR for the
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 107c873b23c2..058dc6c478bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1819,6 +1819,22 @@ static int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
 	}
 }
 
+static inline u64 vmx_msr_test_ctrl_valid_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	u64 valid_bits = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Note: for guest, feature split lock detection can only be enumerated
+	 * through MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES bit.
+	 * The FMS enumeration is invalid.
+	 */
+	if (vcpu->arch.core_capabilities &
+	    MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT)
+		valid_bits |= MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+
+	return valid_bits;
+}
+
 /*
  * Reads an msr value (of 'msr_index') into 'pdata'.
  * Returns 0 on success, non-0 otherwise.
@@ -1988,7 +2004,7 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 
 	switch (msr_index) {
 	case MSR_TEST_CTRL:
-		if (data)
+		if (data & ~vmx_msr_test_ctrl_valid_bits(vcpu))
 			return 1;
 
 		vmx->msr_test_ctrl = data;
@@ -4625,6 +4641,11 @@ static inline bool guest_cpu_alignment_check_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	       (kvm_get_rflags(vcpu) & X86_EFLAGS_AC);
 }
 
+static inline bool guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
+{
+	return vmx->msr_test_ctrl & MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+}
+
 static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
@@ -4721,12 +4742,13 @@ static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	case AC_VECTOR:
 		/*
 		 * Reflect #AC to the guest if it's expecting the #AC, i.e. has
-		 * legacy alignment check enabled.  Pre-check host split lock
-		 * support to avoid the VMREADs needed to check legacy #AC,
-		 * i.e. reflect the #AC if the only possible source is legacy
-		 * alignment checks.
+		 * legacy alignment check enabled or split lock detect enabled.
+		 * Pre-check host split lock support to avoid further check of
+		 * guest, i.e. reflect the #AC if host doesn't enable split lock
+		 * detection.
 		 */
 		if (!split_lock_detect_on() ||
+		    guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(vmx) ||
 		    guest_cpu_alignment_check_enabled(vcpu)) {
 			kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, AC_VECTOR, error_code);
 			return 1;
@@ -6619,6 +6641,14 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	 */
 	x86_spec_ctrl_set_guest(vmx->spec_ctrl, 0);
 
+	if (!split_lock_detect_disabled() &&
+	    guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(vmx)) {
+		if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SLD))
+			sld_turn_back_on();
+		else if (!split_lock_detect_on())
+			sld_msr_set(true);
+	}
+
 	/* L1D Flush includes CPU buffer clear to mitigate MDS */
 	if (static_branch_unlikely(&vmx_l1d_should_flush))
 		vmx_l1d_flush(vcpu);
@@ -6653,6 +6683,11 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	x86_spec_ctrl_restore_host(vmx->spec_ctrl, 0);
 
+	if (!split_lock_detect_disabled() &&
+	    guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(vmx) &&
+	    !split_lock_detect_on())
+		sld_msr_set(false);
+
 	/* All fields are clean at this point */
 	if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
 		current_evmcs->hv_clean_fields |=
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 72d4bfea8864..c956aa180253 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static const u32 msrs_to_save_all[] = {
 #endif
 	MSR_IA32_TSC, MSR_IA32_CR_PAT, MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA,
 	MSR_IA32_FEAT_CTL, MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS, MSR_TSC_AUX,
-	MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL,
+	MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, MSR_TEST_CTRL,
 	MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS, MSR_IA32_RTIT_CR3_MATCH,
 	MSR_IA32_RTIT_OUTPUT_BASE, MSR_IA32_RTIT_OUTPUT_MASK,
 	MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A, MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_B,
@@ -1344,7 +1344,12 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
 
 static u64 kvm_get_core_capabilities(void)
 {
-	return 0;
+	u64 data = 0;
+
+	if (!split_lock_detect_disabled() && !cpu_smt_possible())
+		data |= MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
+
+	return data;
 }
 
 static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
@@ -2729,7 +2734,8 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 		vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = data;
 		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
-		if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
+		if (!msr_info->host_initiated ||
+		    data & ~kvm_get_core_capabilities())
 			return 1;
 		vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = data;
 		break;
@@ -5276,6 +5282,11 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
 		 * to the guests in some cases.
 		 */
 		switch (msrs_to_save_all[i]) {
+		case MSR_TEST_CTRL:
+			if (!(kvm_get_core_capabilities() &
+			      MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
+				continue;
+			break;
 		case MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS:
 			if (!kvm_mpx_supported())
 				continue;
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection
  2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
@ 2020-03-15  2:56   ` Xiaoyao Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Xiaoyao Li @ 2020-03-15  2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, hpa,
	Paolo Bonzini, Sean Christopherson, Andy Lutomirski, tony.luck
  Cc: peterz, fenghua.yu, Arvind Sankar, Vitaly Kuznetsov, Jim Mattson,
	x86, kvm, linux-kernel

On 3/14/2020 3:34 PM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> Due to the fact that MSR_TEST_CTRL is per-core scope, i.e., the sibling
> threads in the same physical CPU core share the same MSR, only
> advertising feature split lock detection to guest when SMT is disabled
> or unsupported, for simplicitly.
> 
> Below summarizing how guest behaves of different host configuration:
> 
>    sld_fatal - hardware MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is always on when vcpu is running,
>                even though guest thinks it sets/clears MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD
> 	      bit successfully. i.e., SLD is forced on for guest.
> 
>    sld_warn - hardware MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is left on until an #AC is
> 	     intercepted with MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD=0 in the guest, at which
> 	     point normal sld_warn rules apply, i.e., clear
> 	     MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD bit and set TIF_SLD.
> 	     If a vCPU associated with the task does VM-Enter with
> 	     virtual MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD=1, TIF_SLD is reset, hardware
> 	     MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is re-set, and cycle begins anew.
> 
>    sld_kvm_only - hardware MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is set on VM-Entry and cleared
> 		 onVM-Exit if guest enables SLD, i.e., guest's virtual
> 	         MSR_TEST_CTRL.SLD is set.
> 
>    sld_disable - guest cannot see feature split lock detection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h  |  2 ++
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c |  7 ++++++
>   arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c      | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c          | 17 +++++++++++---
>   4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
> index 2e17315b1fed..284be32aaf87 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ extern void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
>   extern void switch_to_sld(unsigned long tifn);
>   extern bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip);
>   extern void sld_msr_set(bool on);
> +extern void sld_turn_back_on(void);
>   #else
>   static inline bool split_lock_detect_on(void) { return false; }
>   static inline bool split_lock_detect_disabled(void) { return true; }
> @@ -74,5 +75,6 @@ static inline bool handle_user_split_lock(unsigned long ip)
>   	return false;
>   }
>   static inline void sld_msr_set(bool on) {}
> +static inline void sld_turn_back_on(void) {}
>   #endif
>   #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPU_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> index 8bfe8b07e06e..de46e1d3f1c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,13 @@ void sld_msr_set(bool on)
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sld_msr_set);
>   
> +void sld_turn_back_on(void)
> +{
> +	__sld_msr_set(true);
> +	clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SLD);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sld_turn_back_on);
> +
>   /*
>    * This function is called only when switching between tasks with
>    * different split-lock detection modes. It sets the MSR for the
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 107c873b23c2..058dc6c478bd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1819,6 +1819,22 @@ static int vmx_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static inline u64 vmx_msr_test_ctrl_valid_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	u64 valid_bits = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: for guest, feature split lock detection can only be enumerated
> +	 * through MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES bit.
> +	 * The FMS enumeration is invalid.
> +	 */
> +	if (vcpu->arch.core_capabilities &
> +	    MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT)
> +		valid_bits |= MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
> +
> +	return valid_bits;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * Reads an msr value (of 'msr_index') into 'pdata'.
>    * Returns 0 on success, non-0 otherwise.
> @@ -1988,7 +2004,7 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>   
>   	switch (msr_index) {
>   	case MSR_TEST_CTRL:
> -		if (data)
> +		if (data & ~vmx_msr_test_ctrl_valid_bits(vcpu))
>   			return 1;
>   
>   		vmx->msr_test_ctrl = data;
> @@ -4625,6 +4641,11 @@ static inline bool guest_cpu_alignment_check_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	       (kvm_get_rflags(vcpu) & X86_EFLAGS_AC);
>   }
>   
> +static inline bool guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +{
> +	return vmx->msr_test_ctrl & MSR_TEST_CTRL_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
> +}
> +
>   static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   {
>   	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> @@ -4721,12 +4742,13 @@ static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	case AC_VECTOR:
>   		/*
>   		 * Reflect #AC to the guest if it's expecting the #AC, i.e. has
> -		 * legacy alignment check enabled.  Pre-check host split lock
> -		 * support to avoid the VMREADs needed to check legacy #AC,
> -		 * i.e. reflect the #AC if the only possible source is legacy
> -		 * alignment checks.
> +		 * legacy alignment check enabled or split lock detect enabled.
> +		 * Pre-check host split lock support to avoid further check of
> +		 * guest, i.e. reflect the #AC if host doesn't enable split lock
> +		 * detection.
>   		 */
>   		if (!split_lock_detect_on() ||
> +		    guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(vmx) ||
>   		    guest_cpu_alignment_check_enabled(vcpu)) {
>   			kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, AC_VECTOR, error_code);
>   			return 1;
> @@ -6619,6 +6641,14 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	 */
>   	x86_spec_ctrl_set_guest(vmx->spec_ctrl, 0);
>   
> +	if (!split_lock_detect_disabled() &&
> +	    guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(vmx)) {
> +		if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SLD))
> +			sld_turn_back_on();
> +		else if (!split_lock_detect_on())
> +			sld_msr_set(true);
> +	}
> +
>   	/* L1D Flush includes CPU buffer clear to mitigate MDS */
>   	if (static_branch_unlikely(&vmx_l1d_should_flush))
>   		vmx_l1d_flush(vcpu);
> @@ -6653,6 +6683,11 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   
>   	x86_spec_ctrl_restore_host(vmx->spec_ctrl, 0);
>   
> +	if (!split_lock_detect_disabled() &&
> +	    guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(vmx) &&
> +	    !split_lock_detect_on())
> +		sld_msr_set(false);
> +
>   	/* All fields are clean at this point */
>   	if (static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
>   		current_evmcs->hv_clean_fields |=
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 72d4bfea8864..c956aa180253 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static const u32 msrs_to_save_all[] = {
>   #endif
>   	MSR_IA32_TSC, MSR_IA32_CR_PAT, MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA,
>   	MSR_IA32_FEAT_CTL, MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS, MSR_TSC_AUX,
> -	MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL,
> +	MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, MSR_TEST_CTRL,
>   	MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS, MSR_IA32_RTIT_CR3_MATCH,
>   	MSR_IA32_RTIT_OUTPUT_BASE, MSR_IA32_RTIT_OUTPUT_MASK,
>   	MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A, MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_B,
> @@ -1344,7 +1344,12 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
>   
>   static u64 kvm_get_core_capabilities(void)
>   {
> -	return 0;
> +	u64 data = 0;
> +
> +	if (!split_lock_detect_disabled() && !cpu_smt_possible())
> +		data |= MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;

Just realize that cannot use !split_lock_detect_disabled() to replace 
the X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT check, because it doesn't exclude 
"sld_not_exist" case. Also vmx_vcpu_run() has the same issue.

It should use boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT) to check, and 
drop the split_lock_detect_disabled() helper entirely.

I'll spin a v5, sorry for bothering everyone.

> +
> +	return data;
>   }
>   
>   static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
> @@ -2729,7 +2734,8 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>   		vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = data;
>   		break;
>   	case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS:
> -		if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
> +		if (!msr_info->host_initiated ||
> +		    data & ~kvm_get_core_capabilities())
>   			return 1;
>   		vcpu->arch.core_capabilities = data;
>   		break;
> @@ -5276,6 +5282,11 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
>   		 * to the guests in some cases.
>   		 */
>   		switch (msrs_to_save_all[i]) {
> +		case MSR_TEST_CTRL:
> +			if (!(kvm_get_core_capabilities() &
> +			      MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPS_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
> +				continue;
> +			break;
>   		case MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS:
>   			if (!kvm_mpx_supported())
>   				continue;
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-15  2:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-14  7:34 [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/split_lock: Add feature split lock detection support in kvm Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] x86/split_lock: Re-define the kernel param option for split_lock_detect Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86/split_lock: Add and export several functions for KVM Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-14  7:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] x86: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-15  2:56   ` Xiaoyao Li

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).