From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] mmap locking API: convert nested write lock sites
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:42:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401134234.GR20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327225102.25061-7-walken@google.com>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:50:58PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> @@ -26,6 +31,12 @@ static inline void mmap_write_unlock(struct mm_struct *mm)
> up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> }
>
> +/* Pairs with mmap_write_lock_nested() */
> +static inline void mmap_write_unlock_nested(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +}
> +
> static inline void mmap_downgrade_write_lock(struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> downgrade_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
Why does unlock_nested() make sense ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-01 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 22:50 [PATCH v3 00/10] Add a new mmap locking API wrapping mmap_sem calls Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 8:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers (Michel Lespinasse) SeongJae Park
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] MMU notifier: use the new mmap locking API Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] DMA reservations: " Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed by coccinelle Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 7:36 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 7:47 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 8:39 ` [v3 " Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 8:53 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 9:01 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 13:20 ` [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: Checking the Coccinelle software Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 13:42 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2020-03-28 13:52 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 13:53 ` Julia Lawall
2020-03-28 14:00 ` Julia Lawall
2020-03-28 14:16 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-30 6:10 ` [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: Improving " Markus Elfring
2020-03-30 8:47 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2020-03-30 10:15 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-30 10:20 ` Julia Lawall
2020-03-30 10:42 ` Markus Elfring
2020-04-13 17:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed by coccinelle Daniel Jordan
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mmap locking API: convert nested write lock sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-01 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-04-06 15:35 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-06 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mmap locking API: add mmap_read_release() and mmap_read_unlock_non_owner() Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-01 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 15:39 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mmap locking API: add MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mmap locking API: use lockdep_assert_held Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mmap locking API: rename mmap_sem to mmap_lock Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-01 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 15:49 ` Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200401134234.GR20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).