From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: Checking the Coccinelle software
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 14:20:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <590dbec7-341a-3480-dd47-cb3c65b023c7@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANN689HyS0dYWZw3AeWGBvN6_2G4hRDzjMJQ_adHMh0ZkiACYg@mail.gmail.com>
>> How will corresponding software development resources evolve?
>
> I don't think I understand the question, or, actually, are you asking
> me or the coccinelle developers ?
I hope that another communication approach can eventually increase
the chances for a better common understanding of development challenges.
The code from a mentioned source file can be reduced to the following
test file.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/mips/mm/fault.c?id=69c5eea3128e775fd3c70ecf0098105d96dee330#n34
// deleted part
static void __kprobes __do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long write,
unsigned long address)
{
struct vm_area_struct * vma = NULL;
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->mm;
// deleted part
retry:
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
vma = find_vma(mm, address);
if (!vma)
goto bad_area;
// deleted part
}
// deleted part
Application of the software “Coccinelle 1.0.8-00029-ga549b9f0” (OCaml 4.10.0)
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-c do_page_fault-excerpt3.c
…
NB total files = 1; perfect = 1; pbs = 0; timeout = 0; =========> 100%
nb good = 15, nb passed = 1 =========> 6.25% passed
nb good = 15, nb bad = 0 =========> 100.00% good or passed
The discussed transformation approach can also be reduced for a test
to the following script for the semantic patch language.
@replacement@
expression x;
@@
-down_read
+mmap_read_lock
(
- &
x
- ->mmap_sem
)
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch use_mmap_locking_API_3.cocci do_page_fault-excerpt3.c
The desired diff is not generated so far.
How would you like to fix this situation?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-28 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 22:50 [PATCH v3 00/10] Add a new mmap locking API wrapping mmap_sem calls Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 8:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] mmap locking API: initial implementation as rwsem wrappers (Michel Lespinasse) SeongJae Park
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] MMU notifier: use the new mmap locking API Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] DMA reservations: " Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed by coccinelle Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 7:36 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 7:47 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 8:39 ` [v3 " Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 8:53 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-28 9:01 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 13:20 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-03-28 13:42 ` [Cocci] [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: Checking the Coccinelle software Julia Lawall
2020-03-28 13:52 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-28 13:53 ` Julia Lawall
2020-03-28 14:00 ` Julia Lawall
2020-03-28 14:16 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-30 6:10 ` [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: Improving " Markus Elfring
2020-03-30 8:47 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2020-03-30 10:15 ` Markus Elfring
2020-03-30 10:20 ` Julia Lawall
2020-03-30 10:42 ` Markus Elfring
2020-04-13 17:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed by coccinelle Daniel Jordan
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mmap locking API: convert nested write lock sites Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-01 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 15:35 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-06 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-27 22:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mmap locking API: add mmap_read_release() and mmap_read_unlock_non_owner() Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-01 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 15:39 ` Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mmap locking API: add MMAP_LOCK_INITIALIZER Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mmap locking API: use lockdep_assert_held Michel Lespinasse
2020-03-27 22:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mmap locking API: rename mmap_sem to mmap_lock Michel Lespinasse
2020-04-01 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 15:49 ` Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=590dbec7-341a-3480-dd47-cb3c65b023c7@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).