From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: Harden STRICT_MODULE_RWX
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:27:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200406112732.GK20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406104615.GA9629@linux-8ccs>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:46:17PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Miroslav Benes [06/04/20 11:55 +0200]:
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 06:37:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < hdr->e_shnum; i++) {
> > > > + if (sechdrs[i].sh_flags & (SHF_EXECINSTR|SHF_WRITE))
> > > > + return -ENOEXEC;
> > >
> > > I think you only want the error when both are set?
> > >
> > > if (sechdrs[i].sh_flags & (SHF_EXECINSTR|SHF_WRITE) == (SHF_EXECINSTR|SHF_WRITE))
> >
> > A section with SHF_EXECINSTR and SHF_WRITE but without SHF_ALLOC would be
> > strange though, no? It wouldn't be copied to the final module later
> > anyway.
>
> That's right - move_module() ignores !SHF_ALLOC sections and does not
> copy them over to their final location. So I think we want to look for
> SHF_EXECINSTR|SHF_WRITE|SHF_ALLOC here..
So I did notice that !SHF_ALLOC sections get ignored, but since this
check is about W^X we don't strictly care about SHF_ALLOC. What we care
about it never allowing a writable and executable map.
Adding ALLOC to the test only allows for future mistakes and doesn't
make the check any better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 16:37 [PATCH] module: Harden STRICT_MODULE_RWX Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 16:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 9:55 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-06 10:46 ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-06 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-04-06 12:53 ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-06 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-07 7:43 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-09 16:55 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-10 9:04 ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-03 16:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200406112732.GK20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).