linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/12] READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:52:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415165218.20251-8-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415165218.20251-1-will@kernel.org>

{READ,WRITE}_ONCE() cannot guarantee atomicity for arbitrary data sizes.
This can be surprising to callers that might incorrectly be expecting
atomicity for accesses to aggregate structures, although there are other
callers where tearing is actually permissable (e.g. if they are using
something akin to sequence locking to protect the access).

Linus sayeth:

  | We could also look at being stricter for the normal READ/WRITE_ONCE(),
  | and require that they are
  |
  | (a) regular integer types
  |
  | (b) fit in an atomic word
  |
  | We actually did (b) for a while, until we noticed that we do it on
  | loff_t's etc and relaxed the rules. But maybe we could have a
  | "non-atomic" version of READ/WRITE_ONCE() that is used for the
  | questionable cases?

The slight snag is that we also have to support 64-bit accesses on 32-bit
architectures, as these appear to be widespread and tend to work out ok
if either the architecture supports atomic 64-bit accesses (x86, armv7)
or if the variable being accesses represents a virtual address and
therefore only requires 32-bit atomicity in practice.

Take a step in that direction by introducing a variant of
'compiletime_assert_atomic_type()' and use it to check the pointer
argument to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(). Expose __{READ,WRITE_ONCE}() variants
which are allowed to tear and convert the one broken caller over to the
new macros.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/xen/time.c       |  2 +-
 include/linux/compiler.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/time.c b/drivers/xen/time.c
index 0968859c29d0..108edbcbc040 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/time.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/time.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void xen_get_runstate_snapshot_cpu_delta(
 	do {
 		state_time = get64(&state->state_entry_time);
 		rmb();	/* Hypervisor might update data. */
-		*res = READ_ONCE(*state);
+		*res = __READ_ONCE(*state);
 		rmb();	/* Hypervisor might update data. */
 	} while (get64(&state->state_entry_time) != state_time ||
 		 (state_time & XEN_RUNSTATE_UPDATE));
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 0bf6c04b3f8f..3e0b14de3504 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -198,24 +198,43 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, int val,
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
 #include <linux/kasan-checks.h>
 
+/*
+ * Use __READ_ONCE() instead of READ_ONCE() if you do not require any
+ * atomicity or dependency ordering guarantees. Note that this may result
+ * in tears!
+ */
+#define __READ_ONCE(x)	(*(const volatile typeof(x) *)&(x))
+
+#define __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x)						\
+({									\
+	typeof(x) __x = __READ_ONCE(x);					\
+	smp_read_barrier_depends();					\
+	__x;								\
+})
+
 /*
  * Use READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() instead of READ_ONCE() if you need
  * to hide memory access from KASAN.
  */
 #define READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x)						\
 ({									\
-	typeof(x) __x = *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x);			\
-	smp_read_barrier_depends();					\
-	__x;								\
+	compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(x);				\
+	__READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x);						\
 })
 
 #define READ_ONCE(x)	READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(x)
 
-#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val)				\
+#define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val)				\
 do {							\
 	*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val);		\
 } while (0)
 
+#define WRITE_ONCE(x, val)				\
+do {							\
+	compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(x);		\
+	__WRITE_ONCE(x, val);				\
+} while (0)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
 /*
  * We can't declare function 'inline' because __no_sanitize_address conflicts
@@ -299,6 +318,16 @@ static inline void *offset_to_ptr(const int *off)
 	compiletime_assert(__native_word(t),				\
 		"Need native word sized stores/loads for atomicity.")
 
+/*
+ * Yes, this permits 64-bit accesses on 32-bit architectures. These will
+ * actually be atomic in many cases (namely x86), but for others we rely on
+ * the access being split into 2x32-bit accesses for a 32-bit quantity (e.g.
+ * a virtual address) and a strong prevailing wind.
+ */
+#define compiletime_assert_rwonce_type(t)					\
+	compiletime_assert(__native_word(t) || sizeof(t) == sizeof(long long),	\
+		"Unsupported access size for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE().")
+
 /* &a[0] degrades to a pointer: a different type from an array */
 #define __must_be_array(a)	BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))
 
-- 
2.26.0.110.g2183baf09c-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-15 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 16:52 [PATCH v3 00/12] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] compiler/gcc: Emit build-time warning for GCC prior to version 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-04-15 17:20   ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] netfilter: Avoid assigning 'const' pointer to non-const pointer Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] net: tls: " Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] fault_inject: Don't rely on "return value" from WRITE_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] arm64: csum: Disable KASAN for do_csum() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 17:28   ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-15 18:42     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 19:43       ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 20:10         ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 19:26     ` Will Deacon
2020-04-16  9:31       ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-16 11:53         ` Will Deacon
2020-04-16 12:11           ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-15 19:26   ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] READ_ONCE: Simplify implementations of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] READ_ONCE: Drop pointer qualifiers when reading from scalar types Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] locking/barriers: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for load-acquire macros Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: barrier: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for acquire/release macros Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] compiler/gcc: Raise minimum GCC version for kernel builds to 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-04-15 18:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] gcov: Remove old GCC 3.4 support Will Deacon
2020-04-16 12:30 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-16 12:48   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200415165218.20251-8-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).