[PATCH][next] drm/amdgpu: fix unlocks on error return path

[PATCH][next] drm/amdgpu: fix unlocks on error return path

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Currently the error returns paths are unlocking lock kiq->ring_lock
however it seems this should be dev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock as this
is the lock that is being locked and unlocked around the ring
operations.  This looks like a bug, fix it by unlocking the
correct lock.

[ Note: untested ]

Addresses-Coverity: ("Missing unlock")
Fixes: 82478876eaac ("drm/amdgpu: protect ring overrun")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
index b120f9160f13..edaa50d850a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static int gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 		r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
 		if (r) {
 			amdgpu_ring_undo(ring);
-			spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
 			return -ETIME;
 		}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 0a6026308343..055ecba754ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
 		r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
 		if (r) {
 			amdgpu_ring_undo(ring);
-			spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
 			return -ETIME;
 		}
 
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amdgpu: fix unlocks on error return path

[Alex Deucher]

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:56 AM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently the error returns paths are unlocking lock kiq->ring_lock
> however it seems this should be dev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock as this
> is the lock that is being locked and unlocked around the ring
> operations.  This looks like a bug, fix it by unlocking the
> correct lock.
>
> [ Note: untested ]
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Missing unlock")
> Fixes: 82478876eaac ("drm/amdgpu: protect ring overrun")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

It's the same lock, just accessed via a local pointer.  I'll take the
patch and update the commit message when I apply it to avoid confusion
in the future.

Alex

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> index b120f9160f13..edaa50d850a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static int gmc_v10_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>                 r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>                 if (r) {
>                         amdgpu_ring_undo(ring);
> -                       spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
> +                       spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
>                         return -ETIME;
>                 }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> index 0a6026308343..055ecba754ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb_pasid(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>                 r = amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
>                 if (r) {
>                         amdgpu_ring_undo(ring);
> -                       spin_unlock(&kiq->ring_lock);
> +                       spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
>                         return -ETIME;
>                 }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel