linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@gmail.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] bitops: Introduce the the for_each_set_clump macro
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 19:59:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200424175923.4f5y7xfp4w2wlm7b@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424163904.GA7742@icarus>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:42:00PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> Within this patchset the only non-8-bit users are gpio-thunderx and
> gpio-xilinix. The gpio-xilinx has configurable port widths so in some
> instances it can behave like the 8-bit users, but not always.
> 
> If you want to keep the existing for_each_set_clump8 and related
> functions, ignore [PATCH 3/6] and [PATCH 4/6]. That should allow this
> patchset to be just an introduction of the new generic functions without
> affecting the existing 8-bit users.

Yes I don't mind the changes to gpio-thunderx and gpio-xilinx at all
but please leave the 8-bit users as they are wherever possible.
Actually my concern is not just performance but the existing 8-bit
variant is simpler to understand than the generic variant,
making it easier to follow the code in the drivers.

Thanks,

Lukas

      reply	other threads:[~2020-04-24 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24 12:25 [PATCH 1/6] bitops: Introduce the the for_each_set_clump macro Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-04-24 14:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2020-04-24 14:52   ` Syed Nayyar Waris
2020-04-24 15:00     ` Lukas Wunner
2020-04-24 15:09       ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-04-24 16:34         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-24 16:42           ` William Breathitt Gray
2020-04-24 17:59             ` Lukas Wunner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200424175923.4f5y7xfp4w2wlm7b@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syednwaris@gmail.com \
    --cc=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).