From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] kvm: x86: Rename KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD to KVM_DEBUGREG_NEED_RELOAD
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:29:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200424202921.GG30013@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424202103.GA48376@xz-x1>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:21:03PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:09:42PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 06:15:07PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> > > To make it more clear that the flag means DRn (except DR7) need to be
> > > reloaded before vm entry.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +++---
> > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > index c7da23aed79a..f465c76e6e5a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > > @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops;
> > > enum {
> > > KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED = 1,
> > > KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT = 2,
> > > - KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD = 4,
> > > + KVM_DEBUGREG_NEED_RELOAD = 4,
> >
> > My vote would be for KVM_DEBUGREG_DIRTY Any bit that is set switch_db_regs
> > triggers a reload, whereas I would expect a RELOAD flag to be set _every_
> > time a load is needed and thus be the only bit that's checked
>
> But then shouldn't DIRTY be set as long as KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED is set every
> time before vmenter? Then it'll somehow go back to switch_db_regs, iiuc...
>
> IIUC RELOAD actually wants to say "reload only for this iteration", that's why
> it's cleared after each reload. So maybe... RELOAD_ONCE?
Or FORCE_LOAD, or FORCE_RELOAD? Those crossed my mind as well.
> (Btw, do we have debug regs tests somewhere no matter inside guest or with
> KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG?)
I don't think so?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-24 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 10:15 [RFC PATCH 0/3] kvm: x86: Cleanup and optimazation of switch_db_regs Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-16 10:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] kvm: x86: Rename KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD to KVM_DEBUGREG_NEED_RELOAD Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-23 19:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 13:28 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-24 20:21 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-24 20:29 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-04-24 20:59 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-25 7:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-27 14:37 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-27 16:06 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-25 8:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-25 16:54 ` Nadav Amit
2020-04-25 19:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-16 10:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] kvm: x86: Use KVM_DEBUGREG_NEED_RELOAD instead of KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-23 19:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-24 13:21 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-16 10:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] kvm: x86: skip DRn reload if previous VM exit is DR access VM exit Xiaoyao Li
2020-04-23 19:31 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200424202921.GG30013@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).