[PATCH] MIPS: Lasat: Remove dead code in lasat.h

[PATCH] MIPS: Lasat: Remove dead code in lasat.h

[Jason Yan]

This code has been marked dead for more than 10 years. Seems no need to
keep it now.

Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
---
 arch/mips/include/asm/lasat/lasat.h | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/lasat/lasat.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/lasat/lasat.h
index 483be606960d..7659818f6553 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/lasat/lasat.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/lasat/lasat.h
@@ -121,11 +121,6 @@ struct lasat_eeprom_struct_pre7 {
 #define LASAT_BMID_SAFEPIPE5000		5
 #define LASAT_BMID_SAFEPIPE7000		6
 #define LASAT_BMID_SAFEPIPE1000		7
-#if 0
-#define LASAT_BMID_SAFEPIPE30		7
-#define LASAT_BMID_SAFEPIPE5100		8
-#define LASAT_BMID_SAFEPIPE7100		9
-#endif
 #define LASAT_BMID_UNKNOWN		0xf
 #define LASAT_MAX_BMID_NAMES		9   /* no larger than 15! */
 
-- 
2.21.1

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Lasat: Remove dead code in lasat.h

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:42:58PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
> This code has been marked dead for more than 10 years. Seems no need to
> keep it now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/mips/include/asm/lasat/lasat.h | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

I'll send a patch shortly to remove lasat completly. Therefore I'm
not going to apply this cleanup patch.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Lasat: Remove dead code in lasat.h

[Jason Yan]

在 2020/5/7 16:38, Thomas Bogendoerfer 写道:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:42:58PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
>> This code has been marked dead for more than 10 years. Seems no need to
>> keep it now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/include/asm/lasat/lasat.h | 5 -----
>>   1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> I'll send a patch shortly to remove lasat completly. Therefore I'm
> not going to apply this cleanup patch.
> 

OK, thanks for letting me know this infomation.

Jason

> Thomas.
>