linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ALSA: fireworks: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
@ 2020-05-07 18:52 Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2020-05-08  2:27 ` Takashi Sakamoto
  2020-05-08  7:41 ` Takashi Iwai
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2020-05-07 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Clemens Ladisch, Takashi Sakamoto; +Cc: alsa-devel, linux-kernel

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h
index dda797209a27..654e28a6669f 100644
--- a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h
+++ b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ struct snd_efw_phys_meters {
 	u32 in_meters;
 	u32 reserved4;
 	u32 reserved5;
-	u32 values[0];
+	u32 values[];
 } __packed;
 enum snd_efw_clock_source {
 	SND_EFW_CLOCK_SOURCE_INTERNAL	= 0,


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ALSA: fireworks: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
  2020-05-07 18:52 [PATCH] ALSA: fireworks: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2020-05-08  2:27 ` Takashi Sakamoto
  2020-05-08  7:41 ` Takashi Iwai
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Sakamoto @ 2020-05-08  2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: Clemens Ladisch, alsa-devel, linux-kernel

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 01:52:45PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
> 
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
> 
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> 
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
> 
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> 
> sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
> members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
> which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
> zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
> some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
> help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
> 
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> ---
>  sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
Acked-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>

> diff --git a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h
> index dda797209a27..654e28a6669f 100644
> --- a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h
> +++ b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks.h
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ struct snd_efw_phys_meters {
>  	u32 in_meters;
>  	u32 reserved4;
>  	u32 reserved5;
> -	u32 values[0];
> +	u32 values[];
>  } __packed;
>  enum snd_efw_clock_source {
>  	SND_EFW_CLOCK_SOURCE_INTERNAL	= 0,


Thanks

Takashi Sakamoto

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ALSA: fireworks: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
  2020-05-07 18:52 [PATCH] ALSA: fireworks: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2020-05-08  2:27 ` Takashi Sakamoto
@ 2020-05-08  7:41 ` Takashi Iwai
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2020-05-08  7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
  Cc: Clemens Ladisch, Takashi Sakamoto, alsa-devel, linux-kernel

On Thu, 07 May 2020 20:52:45 +0200,
Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
> 
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
> 
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> 
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
> 
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> 
> sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
> members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
> which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
> zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
> some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
> help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
> 
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Applied, thanks.


Takashi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-08  7:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-07 18:52 [PATCH] ALSA: fireworks: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Gustavo A. R. Silva
2020-05-08  2:27 ` Takashi Sakamoto
2020-05-08  7:41 ` Takashi Iwai

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).