From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 16:06:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512140650.GJ2978@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200511204410.GI13245@lorien.usersys.redhat.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 04:44:10PM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> Peter/Ingo, do you want me to resend or can you fix when applying?
I now have this, do I need more edits?
---
Subject: sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
From: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 16:36:12 -0400
From: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more
The recent patch, fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning)
did not fully resolve the issues with the rq->tmp_alone_branch !=
&rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list warning in enqueue_task_fair. There is a case where
the first for_each_sched_entity loop exits due to on_rq, having incompletely
updated the list. In this case the second for_each_sched_entity loop can
further modify se. The later code to fix up the list management fails to do
what is needed because se no longer points to the sched_entity which broke
out of the first loop.
Address this by calling list_add_leaf_cfs_rq if there are throttled
parents while doing the second for_each_sched_entity loop.
Fixes: fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning)
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200507203612.GF19331@lorien.usersys.redhat.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5479,6 +5479,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
/* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
goto enqueue_throttle;
+
+ /*
+ * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the
+ * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list.
+ */
+ if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
+ list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
enqueue_throttle:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 14:18 [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more Phil Auld
2020-05-06 16:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-06 18:05 ` Phil Auld
2020-05-07 15:06 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-07 15:17 ` Phil Auld
2020-05-07 18:04 ` Phil Auld
2020-05-07 18:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-07 20:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Phil Auld
2020-05-08 15:15 ` Tao Zhou
2020-05-08 15:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-08 17:02 ` Tao Zhou
2020-05-11 8:36 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <BL0PR14MB37792D0FD629FFF1C9FEDE369AA10@BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
2020-05-11 19:22 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-11 8:40 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-11 9:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-11 10:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-11 12:12 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-11 17:02 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-11 17:14 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <BL0PR14MB3779ED5E2E5AD157B58D002C9AA10@BL0PR14MB3779.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
2020-05-11 17:03 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-11 19:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-05-11 20:44 ` Phil Auld
2020-05-12 9:00 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-12 13:37 ` Phil Auld
2020-05-12 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-05-12 13:52 ` [PATCH v3] " Phil Auld
2020-05-12 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-12 14:24 ` Phil Auld
2020-05-19 18:44 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() " tip-bot2 for Phil Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200512140650.GJ2978@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).