From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk/kdb: Redirect printk messages into kdb in any context
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 13:21:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520042102.GA938@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518092139.GK7340@linux-b0ei>
On (20/05/18 11:21), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > > Is this guaranteed that we never execute this path from NMI?
>
> Good question!
>
> > Absolutely not.
> >
> > The execution context for kdb is pretty much unique... we are running a
> > debug mode with all CPUs parked in a holding loop with interrupts
> > disabled. One CPU is at an unknown exception state and the others are
> > either handling an IRQ or NMI depending on architecture[1].
>
> This is similar to the situation in panic() when other CPUs are
> stopped. It is more safe when the CPUs are stopped using IRQ.
> There is higher danger of a deadlock when NMI is used.
>
> bust_spinlock() is used in panic() to increase the chance to go over
> the deadlock and actually see the messages. It is not enough when
> more locks are used by the console (VT/TTY is good example). And
> it is not guaranteed that the console will still work after
> the hack is disabled by bust_spinlocks(0).
Good point. It's not guaranteed to help, but bust_spinlocks() does
help in general, many serial drivers do check oops_in_progress and
use a deadlock safe approach when locking port lock. I don't see
bust_spinlocks() being used in kdb, so it probably better start
doing so (along with general for_each_console() loop improvements,
like checking if console is enabled/available/etc).
[..]
> > > If so, can this please be added to the commit message? A more
> > > detailed commit message will help a lot.
>
> What about?
>
> "KDB has to get messages on consoles even when the system is stopped.
> It uses kdb_printf() internally and calls console drivers on its own.
>
> It uses a hack to reuse an existing code. It sets "kdb_trap_printk"
> global variable to redirect even the normal printk() into the
> kdb_printf() variant.
>
> The variable "kdb_trap_printk" is checked in printk_default() and
> it is ignored when printk is redirected to printk_safe in NMI context.
> Solve this by moving the check into printk_func().
>
> It is obvious that it is not fully safe. But it does not make things
> worse. The console drivers are already called in this context by
> kdb_printf() direct calls."
This looks more informative indeed. Thanks!
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 8:48 [PATCH] kgdb: Fix broken handling of printk() in NMI context Sumit Garg
2020-05-12 14:25 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-05-13 13:34 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-14 8:42 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-15 5:46 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-15 8:50 ` [PATCH] printk/kdb: Redirect printk messages into kdb in any context Petr Mladek
2020-05-15 10:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-15 12:02 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-15 16:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-15 16:52 ` Doug Anderson
2020-05-18 6:19 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-10 16:41 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-11 7:27 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-06-11 7:58 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-15 13:48 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-05-15 16:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-18 9:21 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-20 4:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2020-05-20 9:35 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-05-20 10:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Petr Mladek
2020-05-20 11:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-20 16:07 ` Daniel Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200520042102.GA938@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).