linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk/kdb: Redirect printk messages into kdb in any context
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:52:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XohG8ErL=_fyuA+MXEmfp55aW+SxSunb6YPRYj77bOxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200515163638.GI42471@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>

Hi,

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:36 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On (20/05/15 17:32), Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Can I please have some context what problem does this solve?
> >
> > You can find the problem description here [1] which leads to this fix.
>
> [..]
>
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/12/213
>
> Thanks for the link. I'm slightly surprised it took so many years
> to notice the addition of printk_nmi/printk_safe :)

I haven't looked at all the details, but IIUC we don't normally enter
kgdb on the primary CPU through a NMI context, but the secondary ones
(on x86) always do.  Most things are run on the primary CPU and I
think it's relatively unlikely for people to change the primary CPU
(though it is possible).

Probably things got worse when I changed the way "btc" worked to make
it common between all architectures.  See commit 9ef50a686b53
("UPSTREAM: kdb: Fix stack crawling on 'running' CPUs that aren't the
master").  Though theoretically someone could have changed masters and
reproduced the problem with a simple "bt" before my patch, now a
relatively normal command "btc" would tickle the problem.  I didn't
notice it because I work almost totally on arm/arm64 machines and they
don't have NMI (yet).

In general I've always wondered about why (historically) kgdb bugs
have sometimes gone unnoticed for a period of time.  That does seem to
be changing, though, and I've seen a few longstanding bugs getting
fixed recently.  :-)


-Doug

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-15 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-12  8:48 [PATCH] kgdb: Fix broken handling of printk() in NMI context Sumit Garg
2020-05-12 14:25 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-05-13 13:34   ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-14  8:42     ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-15  5:46       ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-15  8:50         ` [PATCH] printk/kdb: Redirect printk messages into kdb in any context Petr Mladek
2020-05-15 10:33           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-15 12:02             ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-15 16:36               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-15 16:52                 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
2020-05-18  6:19                   ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-10 16:41                 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-11  7:27                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-06-11  7:58                   ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-15 13:48             ` Daniel Thompson
2020-05-15 16:24               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-18  9:21               ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-20  4:21                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-20  9:35                   ` Daniel Thompson
2020-05-20 10:22                     ` [PATCH v2] " Petr Mladek
2020-05-20 11:17                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-05-20 16:07                       ` Daniel Thompson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD=FV=XohG8ErL=_fyuA+MXEmfp55aW+SxSunb6YPRYj77bOxQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).