linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:59:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200605155954.GV1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4900bf6-99b3-c9b9-4fd0-7f491bd46de6@physik.fu-berlin.de>

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:47:34PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 6/5/20 5:43 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
> >> Can you include the patch as well?
> > 
> > This one is outside arch/sh and I'm not sure it's permissible to go up
> > through my tree. I was also under the impression that only part 1 was
> > needed to fix the immediate problem on sh and tha part 2 was for
> > completeness and to make sure the same doesn't happen on other archs
> > in the future, but maybe my understanding here is incorrect.
> 
> Ah, sorry, I missed that. You're right, it should probably go through
> someone else's tree then.

Do you know if it's needed to un-break sh4? If so we should push to
get whoever has jurisdiction over it to include it; otherwise I'm
indifferent.

> >> And would it be okay to send a PR to Linus
> >> after that?
> > 
> > Sure, will do right away once we resolve what to do with the above,
> > and provided you don't have anything else you want me to evaluate for
> > inclusion.
> 
> Since we haven't agreed on the __get_user_64() patch yet, I would be
> in favor of getting the changes pulled in that have already been
> reviewed and acknowledged. I rather don't want the other contributors
> to wait any longer. Arnd in particular has done a tremendous job to
> untangle all the SH-5 code and I think we should finally get this
> in :).

Absolutely agreed.

Rich

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-05 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24 22:19 [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-24 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-07 14:35 ` [GIT PULL] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-28  5:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-28  5:55     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-28  9:40       ` Rob Landley
2020-05-28 16:14     ` Rich Felker
2020-05-28 22:14       ` Rich Felker
2020-05-28 22:28         ` Rob Landley
2020-05-28 22:32         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-28 22:37           ` Rich Felker
2020-05-29 14:35         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-29 14:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-29 17:53         ` Rich Felker
2020-05-29 18:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-30  8:08           ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-30  8:47             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-31  3:20             ` Rob Landley
2020-05-31  8:03               ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-01  2:55                 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-01  8:16                   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-01 18:13             ` Rich Felker
2020-06-01 21:12               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-02  1:33               ` Rich Felker
2020-06-02  2:49                 ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-02  2:53                   ` Rich Felker
2020-06-03  7:27                 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-03  7:31                   ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 15:38                 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 15:43                   ` Rich Felker
2020-06-05 15:47                     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 15:59                       ` Rich Felker [this message]
2020-06-05 17:58                         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 18:23                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-06  0:50                             ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200605155954.GV1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
    --to=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).