From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 00:32:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2fd7d94-2610-476a-a06a-5a058956db56@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528221450.GF1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Hello Rich!
On 5/29/20 12:14 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> To follow up, I see that there was a patch series of yours (3/24) I
> missed ack'ing fairly recently. At first glance it looks good. It
> happened to arrive while I was getting over being horribly sick with
> what I thought was covid19. If there's further action needed on it
> I'll address it asap now that I'm aware of it.
Glad to hear from you again! I hope you have fully recovered!
> In general, most of the patches I see are things that the linux-sh
> list and myself end up cc'd on that are only tangentially related to
> arch/sh or even not related at all. In that case I normally trust
> other maintainers familiar with the cross-arch changes being made that
> the small arch/sh part of the change is ok if the broader change is
> abstractly ok.
>
> Part of why I really disliked the "just kill it all" response to this
> thread is that the sh5 removal is specifically for the sake of making
> the arch more maintainable. That, along with forward-porting Sato's
> SH4 device tree patches (I've tried this but ran into problems, and
> need some help with it), has long been on my agenda for the arch, to
> reduce (and ultimately eliminate) the amount of legacy "only on
> arch/sh" stuff left so that it's not a burden on other maintainers and
> contributors. Seeing sentiment along the lines of "why don't you just
> remove it all while you're at it?" as a response is disheartening and
> also dismissive of Arnd's work making the sh5 removal happen.
I agree. I have also poured endless hours into Debian's sh4 port fixing
dozens of bugs myself and reporting them upstream whenever I couldn't
fix them myself.
I would also like to add that getting device tree support into SH would
be a huge leap forward and I would be happy to help with the efforts. I
still have some LANDISK and NextVoD devices available if anyone needs
hardware for testing and development, FWIW.
Would be great to also hear back from Sato-san, he is still active
on his other Linux trees [1].
> Aside from that, the open source & open hardware J-core models are
> still active and in development, with the latest release having been
> made this month, and the J32 with MMU nearly complete and pending
> release, contingent mostly on integration and testing with Linux.
And I'm still very much looking forward to these. I will certainly
buy a bunch of J32 to use them as buildds for Debian's sh4 port!
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://osdn.net/projects/uclinux-h8/scm/git/linux/branches
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 22:19 [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-24 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-07 14:35 ` [GIT PULL] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-28 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-28 5:55 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-28 9:40 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-28 16:14 ` Rich Felker
2020-05-28 22:14 ` Rich Felker
2020-05-28 22:28 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-28 22:32 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [this message]
2020-05-28 22:37 ` Rich Felker
2020-05-29 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-29 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-29 17:53 ` Rich Felker
2020-05-29 18:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-30 8:08 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-05-30 8:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-31 3:20 ` Rob Landley
2020-05-31 8:03 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-01 2:55 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-01 8:16 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-01 18:13 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-01 21:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-02 1:33 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-02 2:49 ` Andrew Morton
2020-06-02 2:53 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-03 7:27 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-03 7:31 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 15:38 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 15:43 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-05 15:47 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 15:59 ` Rich Felker
2020-06-05 17:58 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2020-06-05 18:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-06 0:50 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2fd7d94-2610-476a-a06a-5a058956db56@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--to=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).