linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/13] tools/libperf: introduce notion of static polled file descriptors
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 10:43:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200608084344.GA1520715@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49eca46e-4d0e-2ae5-d7d9-e37a4d680270@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 11:08:56AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> On 05.06.2020 19:15, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> > 
> > On 05.06.2020 14:38, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:50:54PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 06:52:59PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Implement adding of file descriptors by fdarray__add_stat() to
> >>>> fix-sized (currently 1) stat_entries array located at struct fdarray.
> >>>> Append added file descriptors to the array used by poll() syscall
> >>>> during fdarray__poll() call. Copy poll() result of the added
> >>>> descriptors from the array back to the storage for analysis.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  tools/lib/api/fd/array.c                 | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>  tools/lib/api/fd/array.h                 |  7 ++++
> >>>>  tools/lib/perf/evlist.c                  | 11 +++++++
> >>>>  tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evlist.h |  2 ++
> >>>>  4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> >>>> index 58d44d5eee31..b0027f2169c7 100644
> >>>> --- a/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> >>>> +++ b/tools/lib/api/fd/array.c
> >>>> @@ -11,10 +11,16 @@
> >>>>  
> >>>>  void fdarray__init(struct fdarray *fda, int nr_autogrow)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> +	int i;
> >>>> +
> >>>>  	fda->entries	 = NULL;
> >>>>  	fda->priv	 = NULL;
> >>>>  	fda->nr		 = fda->nr_alloc = 0;
> >>>>  	fda->nr_autogrow = nr_autogrow;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	fda->nr_stat = 0;
> >>>> +	for (i = 0; i < FDARRAY__STAT_ENTRIES_MAX; i++)
> >>>> +		fda->stat_entries[i].fd = -1;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  int fdarray__grow(struct fdarray *fda, int nr)
> >>>> @@ -83,6 +89,20 @@ int fdarray__add(struct fdarray *fda, int fd, short revents)
> >>>>  	return pos;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>> +int fdarray__add_stat(struct fdarray *fda, int fd, short revents)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +	int pos = fda->nr_stat;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	if (pos >= FDARRAY__STAT_ENTRIES_MAX)
> >>>> +		return -1;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	fda->stat_entries[pos].fd = fd;
> >>>> +	fda->stat_entries[pos].events = revents;
> >>>> +	fda->nr_stat++;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	return pos;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>>  int fdarray__filter(struct fdarray *fda, short revents,
> >>>>  		    void (*entry_destructor)(struct fdarray *fda, int fd, void *arg),
> >>>>  		    void *arg)
> >>>> @@ -113,7 +133,27 @@ int fdarray__filter(struct fdarray *fda, short revents,
> >>>>  
> >>>>  int fdarray__poll(struct fdarray *fda, int timeout)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> -	return poll(fda->entries, fda->nr, timeout);
> >>>> +	int nr, i, pos, res;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	nr = fda->nr;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +	for (i = 0; i < fda->nr_stat; i++) {
> >>>> +		if (fda->stat_entries[i].fd != -1) {
> >>>> +			pos = fdarray__add(fda, fda->stat_entries[i].fd,
> >>>> +					   fda->stat_entries[i].events);
> >>>
> >>> so every call to fdarray__poll will add whatever is
> >>> in stat_entries to entries? how is it removed?
> >>>
> >>> I think you should either follow what Adrian said
> >>> and put 'static' descriptors early and check for
> >>> filter number to match it as an 'quick fix'
> >>>
> >>> or we should fix it for real and make it generic
> >>>
> >>> so currently the interface is like this:
> >>>
> >>>   pos1 = fdarray__add(a, fd1 ... );
> >>>   pos2 = fdarray__add(a, fd2 ... );
> >>>   pos3 = fdarray__add(a, fd2 ... );
> >>>
> >>>   fdarray__poll(a);
> >>>
> >>>   num = fdarray__filter(a, revents, destructor, arg);
> >>>
> >>> when fdarray__filter removes some of the fds the 'pos1,pos2,pos3'
> >>> indexes are not relevant anymore
> > 
> > and that is why the return value of fdarray__add() should be converted
> > to bool (added/not added). Currently the return value is used as bool
> > only allover the calling code.
> > 
> > fdarray__add_fixed() brings the notion of fd with fixed pos which is
> > valid after fdarray__add_fixed() call so the pos could be used to access
> > pos fd poll status after poll() call.
> > 
> > pos = fdarray__add_fixed(array, fd);
> > fdarray_poll(array);
> > revents = fdarray_fixed_revents(array, pos);
> > fdarray__del(array, pos);
> 
> So how is it about just adding _revents() and _del() for fixed fds with
> correction of retval to bool for fdarray__add()?

I don't like the separation for fixed and non-fixed fds,
why can't we make generic?

jirka


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-08  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03 15:47 [PATCH v7 00/13] perf: support enable and disable commands in stat and record modes Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:52 ` [PATCH v7 01/13] tools/libperf: introduce notion of static polled file descriptors Alexey Budankov
2020-06-05 10:50   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-05 11:38     ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-05 16:15       ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-08  8:08         ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-08  8:43           ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-06-08  9:54             ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-08 15:05               ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-08 16:07               ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-08 16:43                 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-08 17:18                   ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-09 14:56                     ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-09 18:51                       ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-15 13:13                       ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-15 17:38                       ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-15  5:20                 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-15 12:30                   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-15 14:37                     ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-15 16:58                       ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-17  9:27                         ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-17  9:39                           ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-22  9:47                         ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-22 10:21                           ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-22 10:50                             ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-22 12:11                               ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-22 14:04                                 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:54                                   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-05 11:50     ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:53 ` [PATCH v7 02/13] perf evlist: introduce control " Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:54 ` [PATCH v7 03/13] perf evlist: implement control command handling functions Alexey Budankov
2020-06-23 14:54   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-06-24 11:48     ` Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:55 ` [PATCH v7 04/13] perf stat: factor out body of event handling loop for system wide Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v7 05/13] perf stat: move target check to loop control statement Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:57 ` [PATCH v7 06/13] perf stat: factor out body of event handling loop for fork case Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:57 ` [PATCH v7 07/13] perf stat: factor out event handling loop into dispatch_events() Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:58 ` [PATCH v7 08/13] perf stat: extend -D,--delay option with -1 value Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/13] perf stat: implement control commands handling Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/13] perf stat: introduce --ctl-fd[-ack] options Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 16:00 ` [PATCH v7 11/13] perf record: extend -D,--delay option with -1 value Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 16:01 ` [PATCH v7 12/13] perf record: implement control commands handling Alexey Budankov
2020-06-03 16:02 ` [PATCH v7 13/13] perf record: introduce --ctl-fd[-ack] options Alexey Budankov
2020-06-05  7:47 ` [PATCH v7 00/13] perf: support enable and disable commands in stat and record modes Alexey Budankov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200608084344.GA1520715@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).