linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [sched/fair] 070f5e860e: reaim.jobs_per_min -10.5% regression
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:54:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200616065432.GA18401@vingu-book> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d60343e9-b3a0-bdc7-84f4-e8c912f92c46@linux.intel.com>


Hi Xing,

Le mardi 16 juin 2020 à 11:17:16 (+0800), Xing Zhengjun a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 6/15/2020 4:10 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Hi Xing,
> > 
> > Le lundi 15 juin 2020 à 15:26:59 (+0800), Xing Zhengjun a écrit :
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 6/12/2020 7:06 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:36:49 +0800 Xing Zhengjun wrote:
> > 

...

> > 
> 
> I apply the patch based on v5.7, the test result is as the following:

TBH, I didn't expect that the results would still be bad, so i wonder if the threshold are
the root problem.

Could you run tests with the patch below that removes condition with runnable_avg ?
I just want to make sure that those 2 conditions are the root cause.

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index da3e5b54715b..f5774d0af059 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8210,10 +8210,6 @@ group_has_capacity(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
        if (sgs->sum_nr_running < sgs->group_weight)
                return true;

-       if ((sgs->group_capacity * imbalance_pct) <
-                       (sgs->group_runnable * 100))
-               return false;
-
        if ((sgs->group_capacity * 100) >
                        (sgs->group_util * imbalance_pct))
                return true;
@@ -8239,10 +8235,6 @@ group_is_overloaded(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
                        (sgs->group_util * imbalance_pct))
                return true;

-       if ((sgs->group_capacity * imbalance_pct) <
-                       (sgs->group_runnable * 100))
-               return true;
-
        return false;
 }



Thanks.
Vincent

> 
> =========================================================================================
> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/runtime/nr_task/debug-setup/test/cpufreq_governor/ucode:
> 
> lkp-ivb-d04/reaim/debian-x86_64-20191114.cgz/x86_64-rhel-7.6/gcc-7/300s/100%/test/five_sec/performance/0x21
> 
> commit:
>   9f68395333ad7f5bfe2f83473fed363d4229f11c
>   070f5e860ee2bf588c99ef7b4c202451faa48236
>   v5.7
>   3e1643da53f3fc7414cfa3ad2a16ab2a164b7f4d (the test patch)
> 
> 9f68395333ad7f5b 070f5e860ee2bf588c99ef7b4c2                        v5.7
> 3e1643da53f3fc7414cfa3ad2a1
> ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> ---------------------------
>          %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change %stddev     %change
> %stddev
>              \          |                \          |                \
> |                \
>       0.69           -10.3%       0.62            -9.1%       0.62
> -7.1%       0.64        reaim.child_systime
>       0.62            -1.0%       0.61            +0.5%       0.62
> +1.3%       0.63        reaim.child_utime
>      66870           -10.0%      60187            -7.6%      61787
> -6.1%      62807        reaim.jobs_per_min
>      16717           -10.0%      15046            -7.6%      15446
> -6.1%      15701        reaim.jobs_per_min_child
>      97.84            -1.1%      96.75            -0.4%      97.43
> -0.5%      97.34        reaim.jti
>      72000           -10.8%      64216            -8.3%      66000
> -5.7%      67885        reaim.max_jobs_per_min
>       0.36           +10.6%       0.40            +7.8%       0.39
> +6.9%       0.38        reaim.parent_time
>       1.58 ±  2%     +71.0%       2.70 ±  2%     +26.9%       2.01 ± 2%
> +32.5%       2.09 ±  6%  reaim.std_dev_percent
>       0.00 ±  5%    +110.4%       0.01 ±  3%     +48.8%       0.01 ± 7%
> +61.7%       0.01 ±  8%  reaim.std_dev_time
>      50800            -2.4%      49600            -1.6%      50000
> -1.3%      50133        reaim.workload
> 
> 
> > > 
> > > =========================================================================================
> > > tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/runtime/nr_task/debug-setup/test/cpufreq_governor/ucode:
> > > 
> > > lkp-ivb-d04/reaim/debian-x86_64-20191114.cgz/x86_64-rhel-7.6/gcc-7/300s/100%/test/five_sec/performance/0x21
> > > 
> > > commit:
> > >    9f68395333ad7f5bfe2f83473fed363d4229f11c
> > >    070f5e860ee2bf588c99ef7b4c202451faa48236
> > >    v5.7
> > >    6b33257768b8dd3982054885ea310871be2cfe0b (Hillf's patch)
> > > 
> > > 9f68395333ad7f5b 070f5e860ee2bf588c99ef7b4c2                        v5.7
> > > 6b33257768b8dd3982054885ea3
> > > ---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
> > > ---------------------------
> > >           %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change %stddev     %change
> > > %stddev
> > >               \          |                \          |                \
> > > |                \
> > >        0.69           -10.3%       0.62            -9.1%       0.62
> > > -10.1%       0.62        reaim.child_systime
> > >        0.62            -1.0%       0.61            +0.5%       0.62
> > > +0.3%       0.62        reaim.child_utime
> > >       66870           -10.0%      60187            -7.6%      61787
> > > -8.3%      61305        reaim.jobs_per_min
> > >       16717           -10.0%      15046            -7.6%      15446
> > > -8.3%      15326        reaim.jobs_per_min_child
> > >       97.84            -1.1%      96.75            -0.4%      97.43
> > > -0.5%      97.37        reaim.jti
> > >       72000           -10.8%      64216            -8.3%      66000
> > > -8.3%      66000        reaim.max_jobs_per_min
> > >        0.36           +10.6%       0.40            +7.8%       0.39
> > > +9.4%       0.39        reaim.parent_time
> > >        1.58 ±  2%     +71.0%       2.70 ±  2%     +26.9%       2.01 ± 2%
> > > +33.2%       2.11        reaim.std_dev_percent
> > >        0.00 ±  5%    +110.4%       0.01 ±  3%     +48.8%       0.01 ± 7%
> > > +65.3%       0.01 ±  3%  reaim.std_dev_time
> > >       50800            -2.4%      49600            -1.6%      50000
> > > -1.8%      49866        reaim.workload
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Zhengjun Xing
> 
> -- 
> Zhengjun Xing

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-16  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19  2:38 [sched/fair] 070f5e860e: reaim.jobs_per_min -10.5% regression kernel test robot
2020-06-12  6:36 ` [LKP] " Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-12  7:07   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-12 15:19   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-15  7:37     ` Xing Zhengjun
     [not found]   ` <20200612110616.20264-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-06-12 15:23     ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-15  7:26     ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-15  8:10       ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-16  3:17         ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-16  6:54           ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2020-06-17  0:30             ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-17 14:57               ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-17 16:25                 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-18  2:45                   ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-18 12:35                     ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-19  5:01                       ` Xing Zhengjun
     [not found]                   ` <20200618082406.8292-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-06-19  5:10                     ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-19  4:55                 ` Xing Zhengjun
2020-06-19  7:15                   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-06-24  9:04                     ` Vincent Guittot
     [not found]       ` <20200615151030.6480-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2020-06-16  3:24         ` Xing Zhengjun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200616065432.GA18401@vingu-book \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).