linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, dm-crypt@saout.de,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] dm-crypt excessive overhead
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:23:01 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624002301.GB12716@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALrw=nEjCdg8BuTFT81+tCDtuxgwy05FKZAdvk3oq+pauW0nDA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:24:39PM +0100, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> 
> I may be misunderstanding the terminology, but tasklets execute in
> soft IRQ, don't they? What we care about is to execute the decryption
> as fast as possible, but we can't do it in a hard IRQ context (that
> is, the interrupt context where other interrupts are disabled). As far
> as I understand, tasklets are executed right after the hard IRQ
> context, but with interrupts enabled - which is the first safe-ish
> place to do more lengthy processing without the risk of missing an
> interrupt.

Yes you are absolutely right.  In general high-performance work
should be carried out in softirq context.  That's how the networking
stack works for example.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 16:41 [RFC PATCH 0/1] dm-crypt excessive overhead Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-19 16:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] Add DM_CRYPT_FORCE_INLINE flag to dm-crypt target Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24  5:04   ` [dm-crypt] " Eric Biggers
2020-06-24  5:21     ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24  5:27       ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-24  6:46         ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24  7:24         ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24  7:49     ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24  8:24     ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24 16:24       ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-24 17:00         ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24  5:12   ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-19 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] dm-crypt excessive overhead Mike Snitzer
2020-06-19 18:39   ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-19 19:44     ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-20  1:23     ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-20 19:36       ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-20 21:02         ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-23 15:33       ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-23 16:24         ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24  0:23           ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2020-06-22  0:45   ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-22  7:55     ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-22  8:08       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-23 15:01     ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-23 15:07       ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-23 15:22         ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-24  4:54           ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24  5:22             ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-24  8:02               ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24  4:28       ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200624002301.GB12716@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=ignat@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).