From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
Cc: "snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"kernel-team@cloudflare.com" <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>,
"dm-crypt@saout.de" <dm-crypt@saout.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"agk@redhat.com" <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [dm-crypt] [RFC PATCH 1/1] Add DM_CRYPT_FORCE_INLINE flag to dm-crypt target
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 07:49:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR04MB375123D338D4CB4FD586FE61E7950@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200624050452.GB844@sol.localdomain
On 2020/06/24 14:05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 05:41:32PM +0100, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
>> Sometimes extra thread offloading imposed by dm-crypt hurts IO latency. This is
>> especially visible on busy systems with many processes/threads. Moreover, most
>> Crypto API implementaions are async, that is they offload crypto operations on
>> their own, so this dm-crypt offloading is excessive.
>
> This really should say "some Crypto API implementations are async" instead of
> "most Crypto API implementations are async".
>
> Notably, the AES-NI implementation of AES-XTS is synchronous if you call it in a
> context where SIMD instructions are usable. It's only asynchronous when SIMD is
> not usable. (This seems to have been missed in your blog post.)
>
>> This adds a new flag, which directs dm-crypt not to offload crypto operations
>> and process everything inline. For cases, where crypto operations cannot happen
>> inline (hard interrupt context, for example the read path of the NVME driver),
>> we offload the work to a tasklet rather than a workqueue.
>
> This patch both removes some dm-crypt specific queueing, and changes decryption
> to use softIRQ context instead of a workqueue. It would be useful to know how
> much of a difference the workqueue => softIRQ change makes by itself. Such a
> change could be useful for fscrypt as well. (fscrypt uses a workqueue for
> decryption, but besides that doesn't use any other queueing.)
>
>> @@ -127,7 +128,7 @@ struct iv_elephant_private {
>> * and encrypts / decrypts at the same time.
>> */
>> enum flags { DM_CRYPT_SUSPENDED, DM_CRYPT_KEY_VALID,
>> - DM_CRYPT_SAME_CPU, DM_CRYPT_NO_OFFLOAD };
>> + DM_CRYPT_SAME_CPU, DM_CRYPT_NO_OFFLOAD, DM_CRYPT_FORCE_INLINE = (sizeof(unsigned long) * 8 - 1) };
>
> Assigning a specific enum value isn't necessary.
>
>> @@ -1458,13 +1459,18 @@ static void crypt_alloc_req_skcipher(struct crypt_config *cc,
>>
>> skcipher_request_set_tfm(ctx->r.req, cc->cipher_tfm.tfms[key_index]);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Use REQ_MAY_BACKLOG so a cipher driver internally backlogs
>> - * requests if driver request queue is full.
>> - */
>> - skcipher_request_set_callback(ctx->r.req,
>> - CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
>> - kcryptd_async_done, dmreq_of_req(cc, ctx->r.req));
>> + if (test_bit(DM_CRYPT_FORCE_INLINE, &cc->flags))
>> + /* make sure we zero important fields of the request */
>> + skcipher_request_set_callback(ctx->r.req,
>> + 0, NULL, NULL);
>> + else
>> + /*
>> + * Use REQ_MAY_BACKLOG so a cipher driver internally backlogs
>> + * requests if driver request queue is full.
>> + */
>> + skcipher_request_set_callback(ctx->r.req,
>> + CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG,
>> + kcryptd_async_done, dmreq_of_req(cc, ctx->r.req));
>> }
>
> This looks wrong. Unless type=0 and mask=CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC are passed to
> crypto_alloc_skcipher(), the skcipher implementation can still be asynchronous,
> in which case providing a callback is required.
Another point: for a skcipher implementation that is asynchronous, for the
regular case/not-inline, can't we just issue the request directly without using
the workqueue ? If yes, that would save one context switch, since queueing of
the request can be handled by the crypto API when the request callback is set
with CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG. At least that is how I understood the
documentation & comments. I may be wrong here...
>
> Do you intend that the "force_inline" option forces the use of a synchronous
> skcipher (alongside the other things it does)? Or should it still allow
> asynchronous ones?
>
> We may not actually have a choice in that matter, since xts-aes-aesni has the
> CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC bit set (as I mentioned) despite being synchronous in most
> cases; thus, the crypto API won't give you it if you ask for a synchronous
> cipher. So I think you still need to allow async skciphers? That means a
> callback is still always required.
>
> - Eric
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 16:41 [RFC PATCH 0/1] dm-crypt excessive overhead Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-19 16:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] Add DM_CRYPT_FORCE_INLINE flag to dm-crypt target Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24 5:04 ` [dm-crypt] " Eric Biggers
2020-06-24 5:21 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24 5:27 ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-24 6:46 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24 7:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24 7:49 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2020-06-24 8:24 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24 16:24 ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-24 17:00 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24 5:12 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-19 16:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] dm-crypt excessive overhead Mike Snitzer
2020-06-19 18:39 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-19 19:44 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-20 1:23 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-20 19:36 ` Mikulas Patocka
2020-06-20 21:02 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-23 15:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-23 16:24 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24 0:23 ` Herbert Xu
2020-06-22 0:45 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-22 7:55 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-22 8:08 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-06-23 15:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-23 15:07 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-23 15:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-24 4:54 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2020-06-24 5:22 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-06-24 8:02 ` Ignat Korchagin
2020-06-24 4:28 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CY4PR04MB375123D338D4CB4FD586FE61E7950@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ignat@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).